Inductor Design-Power Electronics-Lecture Slides, Slides of Power Electronics

This lecture was delivered by Prof. Azhar Ali for Power Electronics course at Bengal Engineering and Science University. It includes: Inductor, Design, Constraints, Procedure, Winding, Magnetics, Filter, Ccm, Buck, Converter, Geometry, Magnetic

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 07/23/2012

gangadarr
gangadarr 🇮🇳

5

(1)

25 documents

1 / 63

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Fundamentals of Power Electronics Chapter 14: Inductor design
1
Chapter 14 Inductor Design
14.1 Filter inductor design constraints
14.2 A step-by-step design procedure
14.3 Multiple-winding magnetics design using the
Kg method
14.4 Examples
14.5 Summary of key points
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f

Partial preview of the text

Download Inductor Design-Power Electronics-Lecture Slides and more Slides Power Electronics in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 14: Inductor design

1

Chapter 14

Inductor Design

Filter inductor design constraints

A step-by-step design procedure

Multiple-winding magnetics design using the K

g^

method

Examples

Summary of key points

Chapter 14: Inductor design

2

Filter inductor design constraints

P

cu

I

rms

2

R

Objective:Design inductor having a given inductance

L

which carries worst-case current

I

max

without saturating,

and which has a given winding resistance

R

, or, equivalently,

exhibits a worst-case copper loss of

L R

i(

t) +–

L

i( t)^

i( t)

t

0

DT

s^

T^ s

I^

∆i

L

Example

: filter inductor in CCM buck converter

docsity.com

Chapter 14: Inductor design

4

Constraint: maximum flux density

Given a peak winding current

I

max

, it is desired to operate the core flux

density at a peak value

B

max

.^

The value of

B

max

is chosen to be less

than the worst-case saturation flux density

B

sat

of the core material.

From solution of magnetic circuit:Let

I
I

max

and

B
B

max

This is constraint #1. The turns ratio

n

and air gap length

l

g^

are

unknown.

ni

BA

Rc

g

nI

max

=

B

max

A

c^

R

g^

=

B

max

lg μ

0

Chapter 14: Inductor design

5

14.1.2 Constraint: inductance

Must obtain specified inductance

L

. We know that the inductance is

This is constraint #2. The turns ratio

n

, core area

A

, and air gap length c

l g

are unknown.

L

=

n

2 R

g

=

μ

0 A

c^

n

2

l g

Chapter 14: Inductor design

7

The window utilization factor

K

u

also called the “fill factor”

K

u^

is the fraction of the core window area that is filled by copper Mechanisms that cause

K

u^

to be less than 1:

•^

Round wire does not pack perfectly, which reduces

K

u^

by a

factor of 0.7 to 0.55 depending on winding technique

-^

Insulation reduces

K

u^

by a factor of 0.95 to 0.65, depending on

wire size and type of insulation

-^

Bobbin uses some window area

-^

Additional insulation may be required between windings

Typical values of

K

u^

0.5 for simple low-voltage inductor0.25 to 0.3 for off-line transformer0.05 to 0.2 for high-voltage transformer (multiple kV)0.65 for low-voltage foil-winding inductor

Chapter 14: Inductor design

8

14.1.4 Winding resistance

The resistance of the winding iswhere

is the resistivity of the conductor material,

l

b^

is the length of

the wire, and

A

W

is the wire bare area. The resistivity of copper at

room temperature is

^10

-cm

. The length of the wire comprising

an

n

-turn winding can be expressed as

where

MLT
)^

is the mean-length-per-turn of the winding. The mean-

length-per-turn is a function of the core geometry. The aboveequations can be combined to obtain the fourth constraint:

R

=

ρ

n

(

MLT

)

A

W

R

=

ρ

l b A

W

l b^

=

n

(

MLT

)

Chapter 14: Inductor design

10

Core geometrical constant

K

g

A

2 c W

A

( MLT

)^

ρ

L

2 I

2 max

B

2 max

RK

u

Elimination of

n

,^

l g

, and

A

W

leads to

•^

Right-hand side: specifications or other known quantities

-^

Left-hand side: function of only core geometry

So we must choose a core whose geometry satisfies the aboveequation.The core geometrical constant

K

g^

is defined as

K

g

=

A

2 c W

A

( MLT

)

Chapter 14: Inductor design

11

Discussion

K

g

=

A

2 c W

A

( MLT

)^

ρ

L

2 I

2 max

B

2 max

RK

u

K

g^

is a figure-of-merit that describes the effective electrical size of magnetic cores, in applications where the following quantities are specified:

•^

Copper loss

-^

Maximum flux density

How specifications affect the core size:

A smaller core can be used by increasing

B

max

use core material having higher

B

sat

R

allow more copper loss

How the core geometry affects electrical capabilities:

A larger

K

g^

can be obtained by increase of

A

c^

more iron core material, or

W

A^

larger window and more copper

Chapter 14: Inductor design

13

Determine core size

K

g

L

2 I

2 max

B

2 max

RK

u

(^8)

(cm

(^5)

Choose a core which is large enough to satisfy this inequality

(see Appendix D for magnetics design tables). Note the values of

A

, c

W
, A

and

MLT

for this core.

Chapter 14: Inductor design

14

Determine air gap length

with

A

c^

expressed in

cm

μ

0

H/m.

The air gap length is given in meters.The value expressed above is approximate, and neglects fringing flux

and other nonidealities.

l g^

=

μ

0 LI

2 max

B

2 max

A

c

10

(^4)

(m)

Chapter 14: Inductor design

16

Determine number of turns

n

n

LI

max

B

max

A

c

(^4)

Chapter 14: Inductor design

17

Evaluate wire size

A

W

K

Wu

A n

(cm

2 )

Select wire with bare copper area

A

W

less than or equal to this value.

An American Wire Gauge table is included in Appendix D.As a check, the winding resistance can be computed:

R

=

ρ

n

(

MLT

)

A

w

)

Chapter 14: Inductor design

19

14.3.1 Window area allocation

n^1

: n

2 : n

k

rms current

I^1

rms current

I^2

rms current

I^ k

v^1

(t

n

1

v

t)

n

2

v

(k

t)

n

k

Core

Window area

W

A

Core mean lengthper turn

(MLT)

Wire resistivity

ρ

Fill factor

K

u

Given:

application with

k

windings

having known rms currents anddesired turns ratios

Q:

how should the window area

W

A^

be allocated among

the windings?

Chapter 14: Inductor design

20

Allocation of winding area

Total windowarea

W

A

Winding

1

allocation

α

W 1

A

Winding

2

allocation

α

W 2

A etc.

0 <

α

j^

< 1

α

1

α

2

α

k^

= 1