Computing Internal Consistency Reliability in SPSS for Psychology Scales, Study notes of Psychology

How to ensure the internal consistency reliability of a psychology scale in spss by reversing items if necessary and computing reliability using the reliability command. The document also covers what to do if you have multiple scales or if your alpha is low or negative.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/05/2022

allan.dev
allan.dev 🇦🇺

4.5

(86)

1K documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Internal Consistency Reliability in SPSS
Background
In psychology studies, we often measure constructs using scalesa series of several questions that all
ask about aspects of the same construct. For example, to measure extraversion, you might ask people
to rate the following scale items from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree):
1. I see myself as talkative
2. I see myself as quiet
3. I see myself as outgoing
Whenever you use a scale in a scientific study, you’ll need to report its internal consistency reliability (α)
in your Method section.
Reversing Items
Before computing the reliability for a scale, you’ll need to make sure your items are all properly
reversed, if necessary. “Reversing” items means that you need to make sure all items are scored such
that higher numbers represent higher levels of the construct. For example, in the sample extraversion
scale above, higher responses to item #2 would indicate that people saw themselves as LESS extraverted
(because they’re agreeing that they’re quiet). So, before computing reliability for the extraversion scale,
you will need to reverse item #2. (If you’ve already reversed the scoring for item #2 in your survey when
you collected the data, you do not need to reverse it again!)
To reverse an item, the formula is:
(Reversed Score) = (Scale Max) + (Scale Min) (Original Score)
So, imagine that you have the three extraversion items in your dataset:
We need to reverse item e2. It was rated on a scale from 1 to 5. So, using the above formula, we’ll use
the following syntax:
compute e2r = 5+1-e2.
execute.
Whenever you reverse a variable, always create a new variable (e.g., e2r). Don’t simply overwrite the
old variable. You never want to overwrite your original data. Always add new variables instead.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Computing Internal Consistency Reliability in SPSS for Psychology Scales and more Study notes Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Internal Consistency Reliability in SPSS

Background

In psychology studies, we often measure constructs using scales—a series of several questions that all ask about aspects of the same construct. For example, to measure extraversion, you might ask people to rate the following scale items from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree):

  1. I see myself as talkative
  2. I see myself as quiet
  3. I see myself as outgoing Whenever you use a scale in a scientific study, you’ll need to report its internal consistency reliability (α) in your Method section.

Reversing Items

Before computing the reliability for a scale, you’ll need to make sure your items are all properly reversed, if necessary. “Reversing” items means that you need to make sure all items are scored such that higher numbers represent higher levels of the construct. For example, in the sample extraversion scale above, higher responses to item #2 would indicate that people saw themselves as LESS extraverted (because they’re agreeing that they’re quiet). So, before computing reliability for the extraversion scale, you will need to reverse item #2. (If you’ve already reversed the scoring for item #2 in your survey when you collected the data, you do not need to reverse it again!) To reverse an item, the formula is: (Reversed Score) = (Scale Max) + (Scale Min) – (Original Score) So, imagine that you have the three extraversion items in your dataset: We need to reverse item e2. It was rated on a scale from 1 to 5. So, using the above formula, we’ll use the following syntax: compute e2r = 5+1-e2. execute. Whenever you reverse a variable, always create a new variable (e.g., e2r). Don’t simply overwrite the old variable. You never want to overwrite your original data. Always add new variables instead.

Computing Reliability

The syntax for computing internal consistency reliability is: reliability variables= var1 var2[ var3 …]. So, for our extraversion example, the syntax would be: reliability variables=e1 e2r e3. Notice that we ONLY include the properly scored items (e.g., e2r). We do NOT include the original item for items we reversed (e.g., we do NOT include e2).

Reading the Output

Among other tables, you will see one that looks similar to this: Cronbach’s Alpha is the internal consistency reliability of your scale.

What if I have more than one scale?

For example, what if you have items measuring both extraversion and agreeableness? In this case, you will need to compute reliability for extraversion and agreeableness separately! The syntax, assuming that all variables are already properly coded (such that higher numbers represent higher levels of the variable) is: /reliability variables=e1 e2 e3. /reliability variables=a1 a2 a3.

What if my alpha is very low (e.g., .30) or even negative?

This may indicate that you forgot to reverse one of your items. Double check your survey to see how all of the questions were scored. For example, if your reversed items (e.g., “I see myself as quiet”) were already properly coded on the survey (e.g., agree=1 and disagree=5), then you do not need to reverse them again in your syntax. But if all the items in your survey shared the same scale (e.g., always agree= and disagree=1), then you will need to make sure that you reverse items as needed in your syntax.