

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
How to ensure the internal consistency reliability of a psychology scale in spss by reversing items if necessary and computing reliability using the reliability command. The document also covers what to do if you have multiple scales or if your alpha is low or negative.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


In psychology studies, we often measure constructs using scales—a series of several questions that all ask about aspects of the same construct. For example, to measure extraversion, you might ask people to rate the following scale items from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree):
Before computing the reliability for a scale, you’ll need to make sure your items are all properly reversed, if necessary. “Reversing” items means that you need to make sure all items are scored such that higher numbers represent higher levels of the construct. For example, in the sample extraversion scale above, higher responses to item #2 would indicate that people saw themselves as LESS extraverted (because they’re agreeing that they’re quiet). So, before computing reliability for the extraversion scale, you will need to reverse item #2. (If you’ve already reversed the scoring for item #2 in your survey when you collected the data, you do not need to reverse it again!) To reverse an item, the formula is: (Reversed Score) = (Scale Max) + (Scale Min) – (Original Score) So, imagine that you have the three extraversion items in your dataset: We need to reverse item e2. It was rated on a scale from 1 to 5. So, using the above formula, we’ll use the following syntax: compute e2r = 5+1-e2. execute. Whenever you reverse a variable, always create a new variable (e.g., e2r). Don’t simply overwrite the old variable. You never want to overwrite your original data. Always add new variables instead.
The syntax for computing internal consistency reliability is: reliability variables= var1 var2[ var3 …]. So, for our extraversion example, the syntax would be: reliability variables=e1 e2r e3. Notice that we ONLY include the properly scored items (e.g., e2r). We do NOT include the original item for items we reversed (e.g., we do NOT include e2).
Among other tables, you will see one that looks similar to this: Cronbach’s Alpha is the internal consistency reliability of your scale.
For example, what if you have items measuring both extraversion and agreeableness? In this case, you will need to compute reliability for extraversion and agreeableness separately! The syntax, assuming that all variables are already properly coded (such that higher numbers represent higher levels of the variable) is: /reliability variables=e1 e2 e3. /reliability variables=a1 a2 a3.
This may indicate that you forgot to reverse one of your items. Double check your survey to see how all of the questions were scored. For example, if your reversed items (e.g., “I see myself as quiet”) were already properly coded on the survey (e.g., agree=1 and disagree=5), then you do not need to reverse them again in your syntax. But if all the items in your survey shared the same scale (e.g., always agree= and disagree=1), then you will need to make sure that you reverse items as needed in your syntax.