









































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This is a lecture on Chapter 2 of International Relations
Typology: Slides
1 / 49
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!










































What is “international politics”? Core concepts: sovereignty, anarchy, power, legitimacy Actors: states and non-state actors System structure: polarity, balance, security dilemmas Interaction: diplomacy, bargaining, credibility, signaling Coercion: economic statecraft and (limited) force Domestic-international link: two-level games Case analysis templates + review questions
War/peace decisions and crisis escalation Trade, sanctions, technology control, and energy security Alliances, diplomacy, and global institutions Norms (what is “acceptable”) and legitimacy (who is believed)
Sovereignty: supreme authority within a territory. Implications: States guard autonomy; resist external interference. Recognition and legitimacy are political resources.
Power: ability to influence others’ behavior/outcomes. Sources: Military (force projection, deterrence) Economic (markets, finance, sanctions leverage) Political/Institutional (agenda setting, coalition building) Ideational (legitimacy, norms, narratives)
Hard power: coercion via military/economic punishment. Soft power: attraction and legitimacy that shape preferences. Smart power: context-specific combination of tools.
States (central) Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) Multinational corporations (MNCs) Cities/regions, armed groups, individuals, epistemic communities
Goals often include: security, prosperity, influence, and legitimacy. Constraints: external threats and alliances, domestic politics and resources, rules, norms, and reputational costs.
System level: structure, polarity, distribution of capabilities State level: regime type, institutions, interests, economy Individual level: leaders, beliefs, biases, perception
Unipolar: one dominant power Bipolar: two major powers Multipolar: several major powers Polarity shapes: alliance patterns, crisis stability, bargaining leverage.
Defensive steps can appear offensive. Uncertainty about intentions fuels arms racing and mistrust. Mitigation options: transparency, confidence-building measures, institutions.
Economic ties can increase gains from cooperation. But also create vulnerabilities (chokepoints, supply chains, finance). Politics decides whether interdependence becomes “peace” or “weapon.”
Incomplete information about: capabilities, intentions, resolve (willingness to pay costs). Leads to misperception, miscalculation, and bargaining failure.
A promise today may not be credible tomorrow if incentives change. Especially dangerous when: power is shifting, territory/security are at stake, enforcement is weak.