International relations - liberalism, Lecture notes of International Relations

Traditional theories within international relations - liberalism

Typology: Lecture notes

2017/2018

Uploaded on 12/17/2018

adamt1
adamt1 🇩🇰

4

(1)

1 document

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Week 47 (2): Traditional Theories: Liberalism
Liberalism constitutes Realism’s ‘Other’. Whereas realist thought and theories depict
selsh human beings (and states) as living in an anarchical ‘state of nature’ and thus
prone to war and conict, liberalism understands peace as being more common than war,
as human beings are essentially ‘good’. Instead of domination, international relations are
(or should be) characterised by cooperation. This conception of international relations
derives from an important text in liberal thought, that is Kant’s essay on the perpetual
peace from 1795. We will follow the basic ideas of Kant’s infamous essay from through its
inuence on international law and human rights, and towards its upshot in IR liberal
theories.
Assigned reading
Garner, Ferdinand and Lawson, Introduction to Politics, 343-346
Kant, Immanuel (1795) Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Printed in Reiss
(ed.) (2003) Kant - Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press):
93-108
Reading
Perpetual = long, lasting, without end
Christina - Notes
Kant, Immanuel (1795) Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.
1. No peace treaties should contain elements to prevent a future war - to obtain
perpetual peace we need to end all future hostilities
PP Slide: Treaties with provisions for future wars should be avoided
2. No state should be made into a commodity; cannot be acquired by another state by
inheritance, exchange, purchase or gift
PP Slide: People has a right to be governed by their own state: You can't trade a state
3. Standing armies to be abolished since they cause wars of aggressions - showing
military strength will only make other countries do the same
Being hired to kill/be killed contradicts with rights of men
PP Slide: Avoid arms race -> get rid of standing armies
4. Foreign debts must be prohibited since this can lead to war and the dependence on
involvement of other states in case of bankruptcy
PP Slide: no borrowing money -> no debts
5. No state should interfere in another state's internal matters
Exception: if the state has an internal split into two parts, then an external state can
show its support to that part which condition was anarchy
6. There has to be some international regulations of war, so that enemies are able to
trust each other in times of peace. "Acts of hostilities" i.e. espionage must be
prohibited
Section 2:
A suspension of hostilities does not guarantee peace
Man in his mere state of nature can rob another man of the security giving be the
legal civil state
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download International relations - liberalism and more Lecture notes International Relations in PDF only on Docsity!

Week 47 (2): Traditional Theories: Liberalism

Liberalism constitutes Realism’s ‘Other’. Whereas realist thought and theories depict selfish human beings (and states) as living in an anarchical ‘state of nature’ and thus prone to war and conflict, liberalism understands peace as being more common than war, as human beings are essentially ‘good’. Instead of domination , international relations are (or should be) characterised by cooperation. This conception of international relations derives from an important text in liberal thought, that is Kant’s essay on the perpetual peace from 1795. We will follow the basic ideas of Kant’s infamous essay from through its influence on international law and human rights, and towards its upshot in IR liberal theories.

Assigned reading

  • Garner, Ferdinand and Lawson, Introduction to Politics, 343-
  • Kant, Immanuel (1795) Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Printed in Reiss (ed.) (2003) Kant - Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 93-

Reading

Perpetual = long, lasting, without end

Christina - Notes

Kant, Immanuel (1795) Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.

  1. No peace treaties should contain elements to prevent a future war - to obtain perpetual peace we need to end all future hostilities PP Slide: Treaties with provisions for future wars should be avoided
  2. No state should be made into a commodity; cannot be acquired by another state by inheritance, exchange, purchase or gift PP Slide: People has a right to be governed by their own state: You can't trade a state
  3. (^) Standing armies to be abolished since they cause wars of aggressions - showing military strength will only make other countries do the same
  • Being hired to kill/be killed contradicts with rights of men PP Slide: Avoid arms race -> get rid of standing armies
  1. Foreign debts must be prohibited since this can lead to war and the dependence on involvement of other states in case of bankruptcy PP Slide: no borrowing money -> no debts
  2. No state should interfere in another state's internal matters
  • Exception: if the state has an internal split into two parts, then an external state can show its support to that part which condition was anarchy
  1. (^) There has to be some international regulations of war, so that enemies are able to trust each other in times of peace. "Acts of hostilities" i.e. espionage must be prohibited

Section 2:

  • A suspension of hostilities does not guarantee peace
  • Man in his mere state of nature can rob another man of the security giving be the legal civil state

Three types of constitutions:

  1. civil rights of individuals within a nation
  2. international rights of states
  3. cosmopolitan right within individuals and states in an external relationship

Republican constitution is the original basis of a civil constitution

  • Springs from the pure concept of right
  • Will attain the desired result
  • Republican principle: executed power is separated from legislative power On Democracy
  • A despotism: all citizens make decisions about/against the single individual without his consent -> tyranny by the majority
  • Democracy makes everyone wants to be a ruler
  • The smaller number of persons ruling the states, the greater representative power
  • Reaching the perfect constitution is easiest in a monarchy but is only possible in a democracy through violent revolution

The Right of Nations shall be based on a Federation of Free States

  • "Each state sees its own majesty in not having to submit to external legal constraint"
  • America vs. Europe: Where America has made their tribes a "meal", the Europeans have made better use of those they have defeated.
  • Due to no external court war is the only way in which a state can seek their rights and put their claims to trial
  • Peace treaty conditions can lay ground for a new war
  • Pacific federation: agreement between nations to end all wars by aiming to secure the freedom of each state in itself along with the other confederated states - Will secure international right - Spread to more alliances of this kind —> In order to create this men must adapt to public coercive laws and form an international state - but this is not possible since some nations do not have the will to do so. So for now the best would be to create a federation to prevent war

Cosmopolitan Right shall be limited to conditions of universal hospitality

  • The earth belongs to all so no state has originally had a greater right to possess a particular region
  • Commercial states in many cases of suppression of the natives
  • China and Japan have restrictions on entering their territories due to experiences of suppression
  • The world has developed into an universal community where one violation in one part of the world is felt everywhere - the need to establish a cosmopolitan right -> universal right of humanity is crucial if wanting to achieve perpetual peace

Nature has showed that men can live anywhere on earth and should even against their own inclinations.

Lecture notes Liberalist ideas spread in the international:

  • The spread of democracy
  • Multiple networks of trade, communications, finance - globalization
  • Multiplication of intergovernmental organizations

Liberalist scholars > Francis Fukuyama "The end of history and the last man" 1992:

  • Multiple levels of international relations and among different groups outside government
  • Military action becomes less useful -> diplomacy, negotiation, soft power, economic and welfare issues
  • The creation of security communities
  • Complex interdependence

Transnationalism

  • Rosenau (1980): "international relations conducted by governments have been supplemented by relations among private individuals, groups and societies"
  • Slaughter (2004): trans-governmental networks; national government officials cooperate horizontally, no centralized world government institutions
  • Keck and Sikkink: transnational advocacy networks; some issues transcend national borders i.e. climate change -> local social movements, social media, framing and issue as an global issue and thereby holding governments accountable

Liberal intergovernmentalism (Moravcsik 1993, 1998)

  • Absolute vs. relative gains: realist would call this a zero-sum game; if one gains then the other part loses, but liberalist would say that we can all gain something through international relations and diplomacy
  • International integration as a two-level game:
    • Strategic bargaining between states "The supply side": everyone will try to mutually benefit from this game
    • National preference formation (domestic politics and national interests) "The demand side"