Analysis of Conserved Quantities in Nonlinear Systems: Damping vs Stiffness, Assignments of Mathematics

The mathematical optimization technique used to derive the conserved quantity (ceqe) in nonlinear systems with damping. The physical significance of the result (4.14) and compares it to the case of nonlinear stiffness. The text also mentions nuttall's approach.

Typology: Assignments

2020/2021

Uploaded on 03/31/2021

sompete
sompete 🇸🇪

8 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
If the constant ceqe is chosen to equate the ensemble average of the two
powers, E[PL]=E[PNL], then the result is
4.14
which is in agreement with equation (4.4). Thus, the mathematical optimization
technique leading to equation (4.14) ensures that a quantity of great physical
importance, the dissipated power, is conserved. In the expression for ceqe,
and can be interpreted as the cross-correlation between the
nonlinear damping force and the velocity and the auto-correlation function of the
squared velocity, both at zero lag, in agreement with Nuttall’s approach mentioned
above.
If the nonlinearity were to be in the stiffness, rather than the damping, then the
conserved quantity, in the equivalent to equation (4.14), would be E[h(x)x], which
does not have such physical significance, thus suggesting that the quasi-linear
approach can be expected to be more effective for nonlinear damping than for
nonlinear stiffness.

Partial preview of the text

Download Analysis of Conserved Quantities in Nonlinear Systems: Damping vs Stiffness and more Assignments Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

If the constant ceqe is chosen to equate the ensemble average of the two powers, E[PL]=E[PNL], then the result is

which is in agreement with equation (4.4). Thus, the mathematical optimization technique leading to equation (4.14) ensures that a quantity of great physical importance, the dissipated power, is conserved. In the expression for ceqe, and can be interpreted as the cross-correlation between the nonlinear damping force and the velocity and the auto-correlation function of the squared velocity, both at zero lag, in agreement with Nuttall’s approach mentioned above. If the nonlinearity were to be in the stiffness, rather than the damping, then the conserved quantity, in the equivalent to equation (4.14), would be E[h(x)x], which does not have such physical significance, thus suggesting that the quasi-linear approach can be expected to be more effective for nonlinear damping than for nonlinear stiffness.