







































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
IPCRF sheet for public teachers
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 47
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!








































**- READ THIS
IPCRF-Part 2-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 2-Highly Proficient
IPCRF-Part 3-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 3-Highly Proficient
IPCRF-Part 4-Proficient & IPCRF-Part 4-Highly Proficient
HOW TO USE A. Opening the Workbook
B. Encoding IPCRF Ratings (in the Encoding Sheet & IPCRF-Part 3)
C. Accomplishing the Competencies Part of the IPCRF
D. Preparing the Development Plans
E. Submitting IPCRF Parts I-IV to your Rater
art 3)
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) ENCODING SHEET Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher) Name of Employee: ARVIELYN B. SALAS Name of Rater: CHRISTINE HEIDI B. GARCELLANO Position: TEACHER I Position: Bureau/Center/Service/Division Division of Palawan Date of Review: Rating Period: KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Numerical Ratings Q E T KRA 1 20% Objective 1 5% 1 0 0 #DIV/0! Objective 2 5% Objective 3 5% 2 0 0 #DIV/0! Objective 4 5% 3 0 0 #DIV/0! KRA 2 20% Objective 5 5% 4 0 0 #DIV/0! Objective 6 5% 5 0 0 #DIV/0! Objective 7 5% 6 #DIV/0! SET B (COT) 0 0 #DIV/0! Objective 8 5% 7 #DIV/0! SET B (COT) 0 0 #DIV/0! KRA 3 20% Objective 9 5% 8 SET A (COT) 0 0 #DIV/0! SET B (TRF) #DIV/0! Objective 10 5% 9 SET A (COT) 0 0 #DIV/0! SET B (TRF) #DIV/0! Objective 11 5% Objective 12 5% Weight per Objective COT Indicator No. (Set) COT/Supp Material/TRF 1 COT/Supp Material/TRF 2 COT Rating RPMS 5-pt Scale COT Rating RPMS 5-pt Scale SET A (Supp Material) SET A (Supp Material)
KRA 4 30% Objective 13 5% Objective 14 5% Objective 15 5% Objective 16 5% Objective 17 5% Objective 18 5% KRA 5 10% Objective 19 10% Final Rating Adjectival Rating ARVIELYN B. SALAS CHRISTINE HEIDI B. GARCELLANO Ratee Rater Approving Au
0.000 0. 0.000 0. 0.000 0. 0.000 0. 0.000 0. 0.000 0. 0.000 0. #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS I-III Name of Employee: ARVIELYN B. SALAS Name of Rater: CHRISTINE HEIDI B. GARCELLANO Position: TEACHER I Position: 0 Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division of Palawan Date of Review: December 30, 1899 Rating Period: 0 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE 5 4 3 2 1
20% Quality #DIV/0!^ #DIV/0! #DIV/0! WEIGHT PER KRA ACTUAL RESULTS Rating (Quality)
Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 1 as shown in the COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms. Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 1 as shown in the COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms. Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 1 as shown in the COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms. Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 1 as shown in the COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms. Demonstrated Level 3 in Objective 1 as shown in the COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms OR No acceptable evidence was shown.
20% Quality #DIV/0!^ #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Quality #DIV/0!^ #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 5 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 5 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 5 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 5 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 3 in Objective 5 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- agreement forms OR No acceptable evidence was shown.
Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 6 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 6 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 6 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 6 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 3 in Objective 6 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- agreement forms OR No acceptable evidence was shown.
#DIV/0! (^) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! (^) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Quality (SET A) Provided effective and varying learning opportunities that are well-aligned with the learning goals and feature all elements of collaborative learning as shown in the submitted learning material. Provided effective learning opportunities that are well-aligned with the learning goals and engage learners to participate, cooperate, and/or collaborate in continued learning as shown in the submitted learning material. Provided an effective learning opportunity that is well-aligned with the learning goals and engage learners to participate, cooperate, and/or collaborate in continued learning as shown in the submitted learning material. Provided learning opportunity/ies that is/are partially aligned with the learning goals and only somehow engage/s learners to participate, cooperate and/or collaborate in continued learning as shown in the submitted learning material. No acceptable evidence was shown Quality (SET B) Demonstrated Level 7 in Objective 7 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 6 in Objective 7 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 5 in Objective 7 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demonstrated Level 4 in Objective 7 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 3 in Objective 7 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- agreement forms OR No acceptable evidence was shown.
20% #DIV/0! (^) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! (^) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! (^) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3. Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning & Assessment and Reporting 9. Designed, adapted and implemented teaching strategies that are responsive to learners with disabilities, giftednedness and talents
Quality (SET A) Demostrated Level 7 in Objective 9 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 6 in Objective 9 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 5 in Objective 9 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 4 in Objective 9 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 3 in Objective 9 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms OR No acceptable evidence was shown Quality (SET B) Demonstrated Level 5 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 4 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 3 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 2 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 1 as shown in the TRFs OR No acceptable evidence was shown
Quality (SET A) Demostrated Level 7 in Objective 10 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 6 in Objective 10 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 5 in Objective 10 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 4 in Objective 10 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms Demostrated Level 3 in Objective 10 as shown in COT rating sheets/inter- observer agreement forms OR No acceptable evidence was shown
#DIV/0! (^) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Quality #N/A^0 0. Quality #N/A^0 0. Quality (SET B) Demonstrated Level 5 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 4 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 3 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 2 as shown in the TRFs Demonstrated Level 1 as shown in the TRFs OR No acceptable evidence was shown
Evaluated the adapted/contextuali zed learning program as evidenced by MOV No. Monitored progress of the adapted/ contextualized learning program while being implemented as evidence by MOV No. 2 Completed the implementation of the adapted/ contextualized learning program as evidence by MOV No. 3 Planned for the implementation of the adapted/contextuali zed existing learning program as evidenced by MOV No. 4 No acceptable evidence was shown
Implemented a teaching and learning strategy/program using materials based on learners' assessment data as evidenced by a list of identified least/most mastered skills with supporting MOV No. 1 Developed materials based on learners' assessment data as evidenced by a list of identified least/most mastered skills with supporting MOV No. Planned for a teaching and learning strategy and/or program based on learners' assessment data as evidenced by a list of identified least/most mastered skills with supporting MOV No. Analyzed learners' mastered skills based on the frequency of errors and correct responses as evidenced by a list of identified least/most mastered skills No acceptable evidence was shown
Exhibited an improved practice through one's teaching as impact of regularly reviewing one's teaching practice/s using laws and regulations that apply to the profession and the responsibilities in the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers as evidenced by MOV No. Exhibited an improved practice through a teaching materia l as impact of regularly reviewing one's teaching practice/s using laws and regulations that apply to the profession and the responsibilities in the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers as evidenced by MOV No. Reviewed personal teaching practices using laws and regulations that apply to the profession and the responsibilities in the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers in 4 quarters with reflection outputs as evidenced by MOV No. Prticipated in the review of personal teaching practices using laws and regulations that apply to the profession and the responsibilities in the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers in 4 quarters as evidenced by MOV No. No acceptable evidence was shown
Quality #N/A^0 0. Quality #N/A^0 0.
Sustained engagement with the learners, parents/guardians and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures through school-community partnership/s as evidenced by MOV No. Discussed with learners, parents/guardians, and other stakeholders the implemented school policies and procedures as evidenced by MOV No. Communicated with learners, parents/guardians, and other stakeholders the implemented school policies and procedures as evidenced by MOV No. Implemented school policies and procedures without communicating and consulting the learners, parents/guardians and other stakeholders No acceptable evidence was shown
Applied learner- centered teaching philosophy in the lesson plan in all the components of instruction in the lesson plan to improve student learning Applied learner- centered teaching philosophy in the lesson plan in two components of instruction in the lesson plan to improve student learning Applied learner- centered teaching philosophy in the lesson plan in one component of instruction in the lesson plan to improve student learning Application of learner-centered teaching philosophy is reflected but was poorly used as basis for planning/designin g the lesson No acceptable evidence was shown