It is about science subject, Summaries of Science education

It is about the science subjects that were discussed

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 10/06/2022

tracy-cagat-1
tracy-cagat-1 🇵🇭

5

(1)

5 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Below is a synopsis of the film “The Magician’s Twin” by C.S. Lewis and how he tried to
explain some thoughts against scientism.
Film Title: The Magician’s Twin – C.S. Lewis and the Case Against Scientism
Film Synopsis: The film presents Lewis’s warning on the misuse of science to abolish man
and to undermine personal freedom and human dignity (CS Lewis Web, 2013)
If you get the chance and wanted to watch the film, this is available on
Youtube.com with the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPeyJvXU68k
Guide Questions:
1. What is scientism?
2. What is technocracy?
3. How is scientist related to “technocracy”
4. Was CS Lewis against science?
Points to Ponder:
CS Lewis was not against the science per se; rather, he was critical of the ideology of
scientism. He did not see the science being in a privileged position above other forms of
knowledge, exempt from criticism. Furthermore, although science and technology could
provide critical inputs, they were not sufficient by themselves as bases for decision-making.
5. The video contends that science and technology may be gaining increasing control over
our lives, potentially to the detriment of society. Can you cite specific situations in the
Philippines? Or in historical events of global scale?
Points to Ponder:
It may be helpful to differentiate among the fields of S&T. For example, one might argue
that the products of information technology are indeed ubiquitous and so deeply integrated
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download It is about science subject and more Summaries Science education in PDF only on Docsity!

Below is a synopsis of the film “The Magician’s Twin” by C.S. Lewis and how he tried to explain some thoughts against scientism. Film Title: The Magician’s Twin – C.S. Lewis and the Case Against Scientism Film Synopsis: The film presents Lewis’s warning on the misuse of science to abolish man and to undermine personal freedom and human dignity (CS Lewis Web, 2013) If you get the chance and wanted to watch the film, this is available on Youtube.com with the link below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPeyJvXU68k Guide Questions:

  1. What is scientism?
  2. What is technocracy?
  3. How is scientist related to “technocracy”
  4. Was CS Lewis against science? Points to Ponder: CS Lewis was not against the science per se; rather, he was critical of the ideology of scientism. He did not see the science being in a privileged position above other forms of knowledge, exempt from criticism. Furthermore, although science and technology could provide critical inputs, they were not sufficient by themselves as bases for decision-making.
  5. The video contends that science and technology may be gaining increasing control over our lives, potentially to the detriment of society. Can you cite specific situations in the Philippines? Or in historical events of global scale? Points to Ponder: It may be helpful to differentiate among the fields of S&T. For example, one might argue that the products of information technology are indeed ubiquitous and so deeply integrated

into the way we live and work that we are prone to indiscriminate and sometimes unethical use (e.g. cyber-bullying, gaming addictions). In contrast, genetic engineering technologies are still a hotly debated topic. Similarly, research produced by climate scientists is still being questioned by certain sectors of populations. There are decision makers, who do not even “believe” that climate change is happening despite the evidence. This is far from the scenario described in the film about politicians becoming scientist’ “puppets.” The reflection could be made more concrete by reviewing and relating to the previous modules on the nature and practice of science, technology and development, technology and lifestyle.

  1. According to the film, how is science being likened to a religion? What were examples of movements in history that became cause for concern that the scientific method was being applied beyond its appropriate boundaries? Points to Ponder: At this point, it may be helpful to review the modules on the nature and practice of science (especially as contrasted with religion), and the strengths and limits of the scientific method. The scientific method, as a form of rational inquiry, is an important tool; however, it cannot be glorified as the solution of the approach to everything, the “savior” of society. Even today, we are confronted by the doctrine of “technological optimism”, which is the belief that whatever the pressing issues we currently face in society (e.g. energy crisis, food insecurity), technology will develop so as to remedy these problems. Moreover, science should not be manipulated so as to provide the rationale for everything. Movements such as the scientific socialism of the Marxists, and the social Darwinism and racial science in Nazi Germany are cited as examples of when scientific terminology and approaches were used to justify radical, controversial societal beliefs, policies and transformations. As Galileo is supposed to have asserted, “The Bible teaches us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go.” Science and religion have different purposes, and to expect them to offer answers to questions that are perhaps not valid to ask of them constitutes an abuse. This abuse of both science and religion thus creates the false dichotomy of reason vs. faith, of science vs. religion, when really, these are not mutually exclusive.

This question serves as a recap and synthesis of the film. CS Lewis compared science, something we think of a modern invention, to magic, and something that is a more ancient notion. The comparison is made based on 3 points: Science as religion Science as credulity Science as power Magic creates awe and wonder. Science can also give one sense of wonder about the world, a sense of something grander. It is in this sense that science can become a substitute for religion, leading to its potential abuse. Magic promotes a lack of skepticism. Instead of encouraging critical thinking, over-reliance or faith in science may lead to blind acceptance. Lastly, magic is about harnessing and controlling the power of nature. Science, likewise, seeks to control nature, and can become dangerous without ethical and moral foundations. Given these, how can we promote science that “[respects]” human rights and [honors] human dignity”? Can you think of a similar situation here in the Philippines, wherein some policies are implemented in the guise of scientific basis when in fact these are not proven yet as fact?