Power Analysis Using Simulation: A Comprehensive Guide, Study notes of Innovation

An in-depth exploration of power analysis using simulation. It covers early work on the topic, limitations, recent advances, and practical applications. The guide includes examples using various software packages such as R, SAS, and Mplus. It also discusses the importance of power analysis in addressing the replicability crisis and offers insights on how to estimate power for continuous and categorical predictors, as well as for multilevel models and structural equation models.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/04/2022

Meesx
Meesx 🇳🇱

4.2

(9)

190 documents

1 / 107

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
“I’ve Got the Power”:
How Anyone Can Do a Power Analysis
of Any Type of Study Using Simulation
Sean P. Lane Erin P. Hennes Tessa V. West
University of Missouri Purdue University New York University
San Diego, CA SPSP January 29, 2016
Power Analysis Using Simulation 1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download Power Analysis Using Simulation: A Comprehensive Guide and more Study notes Innovation in PDF only on Docsity!

“I’ve Got the Power”:

How Anyone Can Do a Power Analysis

of Any Type of Study Using Simulation

Sean P. Lane Erin P. Hennes Tessa V. West

University of Missouri Purdue University New York University

San Diego, CA SPSP January 29, 2016

Part I

General Approaches to Power Analysis

Dance of the p Values

Simulation example (^) Cumming, G. (2013) Intro Statistics 9 dance of the p values

Visualizing Power

Effect Sizes vs. p Values

  • Effect Size: Magnitude of effect (e.g., r, r

, β, η

, d )

  • Independent of sample size
  • Mean difference or association relative to variability
  • p Value: Probability of obtaining an effect at least as large as what was actually observed if the null hypothesis is true
  • Highly dependent on sample size
  • Mean difference or association relative to the ratio of variability to sample size GOAL: Identify minimum sample to have a high likelihood (e.g., 80%) of a low likelihood (e.g., 5%) of obtaining predicted effect if null is true

Why Should I Do a Power Analysis?

  • Limited Resources
    • Studies are effortful, expensive, and time-consuming
    • Power analyses are free and less time consuming
  • Efficiency
    • Increases chances of finding significant effects
    • Increases chances of replicating prior effects
    • Decreases null effects (file drawer)
    • Increase confidence in null effects

Counterarguments

  • If the effect is significant with a small sample, it must be real
    • AKA, why do we care about power in the “replicability crisis” if power is about Type II errors, not Type I?
  • Why don’t we just recruit a ton of people in all of our studies?
  • Why don’t we just get rid of null hypothesis significance testing?
  • Doesn’t power analysis take a lot of time?
    • YES

What Information Do I Need?

  • Generally working within a regression framework
  • Effect sizes and additional sources of variability
    • Using standardized effects will often reduce the number of parameters that we need to determine
  • Ex. Simple linear regression

Example: Calculating A Priori Power By Hand

for Simple Linear Regression

𝑁 = 𝜎 𝜀 2 𝑧𝛼 2 − 𝑧 𝛽 2 𝛽 2 𝜎 𝑋 2 = 1 − 𝛽 2 𝑧𝛼 2 − 𝑧 𝛽 2 𝛽 2 𝜎 𝑋 2 = 1 −. 15 2 × 1. 96 − −. 84 2

. 15 2 × 1 2 = 341

Example: Calculating A Priori Power Using

G*Power for Simple Linear Regression

t tests - Linear bivariate regression: One group, size of slope Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size Input: Tail(s) = Two Slope H1 = 0. α err prob = 0. Power (1-β err prob) = 0. Slope H0 = 0 Std dev σ_x = 1 Std dev σ_y = 1 Output: Noncentrality parameter δ = 2. Critical t = 1. Df = 341 Total sample size = 343 Actual power = 0.

Early Work

1990s: Closed form or iterative solutions for estimating standard errors and power for two-level models

  • Approximation for estimating standard errors for two-level models (Snijders & Bosker, 1993; Liu & Liang, 1997)
  • Accommodating CS, AR1, and TOEP residual covariance matrices (Hedeker, Gibbons, & Waternaux, 1999)
  • Software for basic nested models [Optimal Design] (Raudenbush & Liu,

Early Work - Limitations

  • Overly restrictive assumptions
  • Approximations that had very limited generalizability
  • Authors conducted analyses themselves and presented tables of sample sizes - Single papers often consisted of tables for only one type of model - Did not instruct researchers to conduct power analyses on their own
  • Published in statistics and education journals

Recent Work

2000s-: More flexible simulation approaches, additional software packages

Ahn, C., Heo, M., & Zhang, S. (2015). Sample size calculations for clustered and longitudinal

outcomes in clinical research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An Introduction to diary and

experience sampling research. New York: Guilford.

Cools, W., Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2008). ML-DEs: A program for designing efficient

multilevel studies. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 236 - 249.

Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moerbeek, M., & Teerenstra, S. (2016). Power analysis of trials with multilevel data. Boca Raton, FL:

CRC Press.

Zhang, Z., & Wang, L. (2009). Statistical power analysis for growth curve models using SAS. Behavior

Research Methods, 41, 1083 - 1094.

Recent Work - Limitations

Design GPower Power & Precision PS PASS RMASS PinT Optimal Design ML-DEs Simulation* t-tests Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Correlation Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes ANOVA Yes Yes Yes* Yes* No No No No Yes** Multiple regression Yes Yes Yes* Yes* No No No No Yes** Multilevel regression No No No No Yes Yes Yes* Yes* Yes** Path analysis No No No No No No No No Yes Latent variables No No No No No No No No Yes