Curriculum Evaluation: Lesson Plan Modification for Eighth-Grade Social Studies Class, Thesis of Brand Marketing

Modifications to a lesson plan for an eighth-grade social studies class on the Causes of the American Revolution. The modifications aim to align the lesson plan with the newly adopted U.S. history standard, which focuses on the contributions of specific key people and groups to the Revolution. The document suggests a new lesson objective and modifications to the 'Materials/Resources' and 'Instructional Plan' sections. The instructional setting addressed is a class of 30 students in the first semester of the academic year.

Typology: Thesis

2023/2024

Available from 01/16/2024

helperatsof-1
helperatsof-1 🇺🇸

4.2

(5)

14K documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Running head: JLM1 Task Two: Lesson Plan
JZT2, Curriculum Evaluation, Task 2
Western Governors University
Introducti
on
The instructional setting addressed is an eighth-grade social studies class of 30
students. The lesson in review takes place in the first unit of study (“Revolution and the New
Nation (1754-1820s)”) during the first semester of the academic year. This lesson covers the
Causes of the American Revolution and students have previously studied about the causes of
the American Revolution and the three different parties that the colonists chose to join.
Differences in Standards
The original U.S. history standard in this Social Studies lesson plan and the newly
adopted U.S. history standard both require that students will understand the causes of the
American Revolution. In their own manner, both standards are set up for students to compare
contributions to the American Revolution. One difference between the original and adopted
standard is that the old standard has three main focuses: perspectives, event order, and
causation, whereas the new standard focuses on the contributions of specific key people and
groups to the Revolution. Another difference is that the new standard does not require
students to address the reconstruction of the chronology of critical events or analyzing
political and economic origins, rather it requires students to compare key people and groups
and does so by using the words “compare” and “use” as methods of showing their
understanding.
New Lesson Objective
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Curriculum Evaluation: Lesson Plan Modification for Eighth-Grade Social Studies Class and more Thesis Brand Marketing in PDF only on Docsity!

Running head: JLM1 Task Two: Lesson Plan JZT2, Curriculum Evaluation, Task 2 Western Governors University Introducti on The instructional setting addressed is an eighth-grade social studies class of 30 students. The lesson in review takes place in the first unit of study (“Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s)”) during the first semester of the academic year. This lesson covers the Causes of the American Revolution and students have previously studied about the causes of the American Revolution and the three different parties that the colonists chose to join. Differences in Standards The original U.S. history standard in this Social Studies lesson plan and the newly adopted U.S. history standard both require that students will understand the causes of the American Revolution. In their own manner, both standards are set up for students to compare contributions to the American Revolution. One difference between the original and adopted standard is that the old standard has three main focuses: perspectives, event order, and causation, whereas the new standard focuses on the contributions of specific key people and groups to the Revolution. Another difference is that the new standard does not require students to address the reconstruction of the chronology of critical events or analyzing political and economic origins, rather it requires students to compare key people and groups and does so by using the words “compare” and “use” as methods of showing their understanding. New Lesson Objective

To create a stronger alignment between the lesson plan and the newly adopted U.S. history standard, I would link a new objective which states: After textbook readings, discussions, and activities, students will be able to create a Venn diagram comparing three key people or groups, and their contributions to the American Revolution. This new objective aligns with the newly adopted U.S. history standard because the diagram will show their comprehension of different contributions of key people and groups to the Revolution, as well as let the students know what is to be expected of them at the end of the lesson. “Materials/Resources” section modification To ensure alignment with the new standard and the new lesson objective, a modification I would make to the “Materials/Resources” section is that I would provide a list of primary sources for students to collect and retain information from, including: photographs, bibliographies, and film clips. The modification of using these primary sources would better align the materials to the portion of the new standard which states that students will, “Use primary sources to compare,” and “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary resources,” (WGU, n.d.). “Instructional Plan” section modification To ensure alignment with the new standard and the new lesson objective, a modification I would make to the “Instructional Plan” section would be to—rather than spend time discussing economic classes and groups —I would present new knowledge about key people and groups who contributed to the American Revolution by exhibiting the list of primary sources. Students would be divided into groups and each be assigned one of the contributors to study using those primary sources. Students would be given a list of specific information to look for. An instructional activity I would then implement would be a Jigsaw where each group creates a poster with their new information and how their person or group contributed to the Revolution and present it to the rest of the class. To