






















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Short PPT for Cognitive Psychology
Typology: Slides
1 / 30
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!























JOHN WENDELL CAĆARES ARIANDA LEILLA ESGUERRA NICOLE PATRICIO
1. Communicative: Language permits us to communicate with one or more people who share our language. Example: You can write what you are thinking and feeling so that others may read and understand your thoughts and feelings 2. Arbitrarily symbolic: Language creates an arbitrary relationship between a symbol and what it represents: an idea, a thing, a process, a relationship, or a description. Referent - the thing or concept in the real world that a word refers to. 2 principles underlying word meanings āŖ The Principle of Conventionality - meanings of words are determined by conventionsāthey have a meaning upon which people agree. āŖ The Principle of Contrast - different words have different meanings. Thus, when you have two different words, they represent two things that are at least slightly different. 3. Regularly structured : Language has a structure; only particularly patterned arrangements of symbols have meaning, and different arrangements yield different meanings.
PROPERTIES OF LANGUAGE
4. Structured at multiple levels : The structure of language can be analyzed at more than one level (e.g., in sounds, meaning units, words, and phrases). Example:
ļ¶ (^) fundamental to language use in our everyday lives. Understanding speech is crucial to human communication. Viewed as different from other perceptual abilities because of both the linguistic nature of the information and the particular way in which information must be encoded for effective transmission. The problem we face when we try to understand what somebody else is saying is that no word sounds exactly the same when it is spoken across the various speakers who say the word. There is a lot of variability across people in the pronunciation of words. People speak faster or slower, or they may pronounce sounds differently depending on where they come from. Example: One of the authorās elementary school teachers pronounced āgetā in a way that sounded like āgit.ā
at the same time. This overlapping of speech sounds may seem to create additional problems for perceiving speech, but is viewed as necessary for the effective transmission of speech information.
separate the continuous sound stream into distinct words.
ļ¶ (^) says that we start with an analysis of auditory sensations and shift to higher-level processing. We identify words on the basis of successively paring down the possibilities for matches between each of the phonemes and the words we already know from memory
ļ¶ (^) discontinuous categories of speech sounds. That is, although the speech sounds, we actually hear comprise a continuum of variation in sound waves, we experience speech sounds categorically. ļ¶ (^) This phenomenon can be seen in the perception of the consonantāvowel combinations ba, da, and ga. A speech signal would look different for each of these syllables. Some patterns in the speech signal lead to the perception of ba. Others lead to the perception of da. And still others lead to perception of ga.
ļ¶ (^) we use the movements of the speakerās vocal tract to perceive what he says. Observing that a speaker rounds his lips or presses his lips together provides the listener with phonetic information.
ļ¶ (^) This effect involves the synchrony of visual and auditory perceptions: When watching a movie, an auditory syllable is perceived differently depending on whether you see the speaker make the sound that matches the pronunciation of the syllable or make another sound that does not match the syllable spoken. Example: Poorly dubbed movies can be confusing. You are vaguely aware that the lips are saying one thing, and you are hearing something else entirely
between people, there can be variation in the meaning formed. Example: The word snake, for many people, the connotation of snake is negative or dangerous. Others, say a biologist specializing in snakes (called a herpetologist), would have a very different and probably much more positive connotation for the word snake. How do we understand word meanings in the first place? We encode meanings into memory through concepts. These include ideas, to which we may attach various characteristics and with which we may connect various other ideas, such as through propositions. They also include images and perhaps motor patterns for implementing particular procedures.
ļ¶ (^) the systematic way in which words can be combined and sequenced to make meaningful phrases and sentences (Carroll, 1986). ļ¶ (^) Whereas studies of speech perception chiefly investigate the phonetic structure of language, syntax focuses on the study of the grammar of phrases and sentences. In other words, it considers the regularity of structure. Psycholinguists use the word grammar in a slightly different way
ļ¶ (^) kind of grammar prescribes the ācorrectā ways in which to structure the use of written and spoken language.
ļ¶ (^) of greater interest to psycholinguists in which an attempt is made to describe the structures, functions, and relationships of words in language. Example : Mario said, āDaddy, what did you bring that book that I donāt want to be read to out of up for?ā Marioās utterance might shiver the spine of any prescriptive grammarian. But Marioās ability to produce such a complex sentence, with such intricate internal interdependencies, would please descriptive grammarians.
āŖ Syntactical Priming ļ¶ (^) we spontaneously tend to use syntactical structures and read faster sentences that parallel the structures of sentences we have just heard. Example: A speaker will be more likely to use a passive construction (e.g., āThe student was praised by the professorā) after hearing a passive construction. He or she will do so even when the topics of the sentences differ. Another Example of Syntactical Priming is SENTENCE PRIMING.
ļ¶ (^) we almost invariably switch nouns for nouns, verbs for verbs, prepositions for prepositions, and so on. Example: We may say, āI put the oven in the cake.ā But we will probably not say, āI put the cake oven in the.ā ļ¶ (^) We usually even attach (and detach) appropriate function morphemes to make the switched words fit their new positions. Example: When meaning to say, āThe butter knives are in the drawer,ā we may say, āThe butter drawers are in the knife.ā Here, we change ādrawerā to plural and āknivesā to singular to preserve the grammaticality of the sentence.
ļ¶ (^) linguists often use tree diagrams, to observe the interrelationships of phrases within a sentence. Helps to reveal the interrelationships of syntactical classes within the phrase structures of sentences. ļ¶ (^) In particular, such diagrams show that sentences are not merely organized chains of words, strung together sequentially. Rather, they are organized into hierarchical structures of embedded phrases. ļ¶ (^) The use of tree diagrams helps to highlight many aspects of how we use language, including both our linguistic sophistication and our difficulties in using language. By observing tree diagrams of ambiguous sentences, psycholinguists can better pinpoint the source of confusion.
2. Transformational Grammar - a new approach to syntax. Rules guide the ways in which an underlying proposition can be arranged into a sentence. There are obviously many different sentences that can express the same proposition. 2 Phrase Structure āŖ Deep Structure - refers to an underlying syntactical structure that links various phrase structures through various transformation rules. āŖ Surface Structure - refers to any of the various phrase structures that may result from such transformations. Example: