


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A comprehensive overview of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory, a leadership approach that emphasizes the dyadic relationship between leaders and followers. It explores the key concepts, assumptions, and phases of lmx theory, highlighting the development of in-group and out-group relationships. The document also discusses the prescriptive aspects of lmx theory, emphasizing the importance of developing high-quality exchanges with all subordinates.
Typology: Exams
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Leader member group theory - answer conceptualizes leadership as a process that is centered on the interactions between a leader and subordinates Theories focused on leaders - answer trait approach, skills approach, and style approach theories focus on the follower and the context - answer situational leadership, contingency theory, and path-goal theory Lmx theory - answer makes the dyadic relationship between leaders and followers the focal point of the leadership process Assumption - answer LMX theory challenges the assumption that leaders treat followers in a collective way, as a group. Development - answer LMX theory first described by Dansereau, Graen, & Haga (1975), Graen & Cashman (1975), and Graen (1976) Revisions - answer Theory has undergone a number of revisions since its inception and continues to be of interest to researchers •First studies of LMX called - Vertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) - answer •Focus on the vertical linkages leaders formed with each of their followers
•Leader's relationship to a work unit viewed as a series of vertical dyads In group - answer Expanded/negotiated role responsibilities (extra- roles) = in-group Relationships marked by mutual trust, respect, liking, and reciprocal influence •Receive more information, influence, confidence, and concern than out-group members Out group - answer •Formal employment contract (defined-roles) = out-group •Relationships marked by formal communication based on job descriptions In-group/out-group status - answer based on how well subordinate works with the leader and how well the leader works with the subordinate How subordinates involve themselves - answer in expanding their role responsibilities with the leader determines whether they become in-group or out-group participants Becoming part of the in-group - answer involves subordinate negotiations in performing activities beyond the formal job description In group subordanant - answer more information, influence, confidence, & concern from Leader
Mature partnership (phase 3) - answer Marked by high-quality leader-member exchanges •Experience high degree of mutual trust, respect, and obligation toward each other