Lecture 13: Octahedral ML6 π Complexes, Lecture notes of Inorganic Chemistry

It is Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II which is written by Prof. Daniel G. Nocera

Typology: Lecture notes

2020/2021

Uploaded on 06/11/2021

stagist
stagist 🇺🇸

4.1

(27)

265 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II
Prof. Daniel G. Nocera
Lecture 13: Octahedral ML6 π Complexes
The basis set needs to be expanded for metal complexes with ligands containing π-
orbitals. An appropriate basis for ligands with two orthogonal π orbitals, e.g. CO,
CN, O2–, X, to the σ bond is shown below,
The arrow is indicative of the directional phase of the pπ orbitals. Owing to their
ungerade symmetry, in constructing the pπ representation
a p orbital, i.e. arrow, that transforms into itself contributes +1
a p orbital that transforms into minus itself contributes –1
a p orbital that moves, contributes 0
E 8C3 6C2 6C4 3C2 i 6S4 8S6 3σh6σd
Oh
6 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 2 a1
g
+ t1u + e
g
Γσ
12 0 0 0 –4 0 0 0 0 0 t1
g
+ t1u + t2
g
+ t2u
Γπ
There is a second method to derive the pπ basis. The Cartesian coordinate systems
on each ligand contains the σ and π basis sets. Thus the Γx,y,z irreducible
representation (which is the sum of Γx + Γy + Γz or Γz + Γx,y for irreducible
representations for which x,y,z are not triply degenerate) defines the 1σ and 2pπ
bonds of each ligand. Since the bond is coincident with the ligand, an unmoved
atom is approximated by Γσ. On the basis of geometrical considerations, the
following is true,
Γ
unmoved =
Γ
σ
atoms
Γσ+π = Γx,y,z Γσ
Γπ = Γσ+π Γσ
5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 13
Prof. Daniel G. Nocera Page 1 of 4
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Lecture 13: Octahedral ML6 π Complexes and more Lecture notes Inorganic Chemistry in PDF only on Docsity!

5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Prof. Daniel G. Nocera Lecture 13: Octahedral ML 6 π Complexes

The basis set needs to be expanded for metal complexes with ligands containing π- orbitals. An appropriate basis for ligands with two orthogonal π orbitals, e.g. CO, CN–, O2–, X–, to the σ bond is shown below,

The arrow is indicative of the directional phase of the pπ orbitals. Owing to their ungerade symmetry, in constructing the pπ representation

™ a p orbital, i.e. arrow, that transforms into itself contributes + ™ a p orbital that transforms into minus itself contributes – ™ a p orbital that moves, contributes 0

Oh E 8C 3 6C 2 6C 4 3C 2 i 6S 4 8S 6 3 σh 6 σd

Γσ 6 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 2 → a1g + t1u + eg Γπ 12 0 0 0 –4 0 0 0 0 0 → t1g + t1u + t2g + t2u

There is a second method to derive the pπ basis. The Cartesian coordinate systems

on each ligand contains the σ and π basis sets. Thus the Γx,y,z irreducible

representation (which is the sum of Γx + Γy + Γz or Γz + Γx,y for irreducible

representations for which x,y,z are not triply degenerate) defines the 1σ and 2pπ bonds of each ligand. Since the bond is coincident with the ligand, an unmoved

atom is approximated by Γσ. On the basis of geometrical considerations, the

following is true,

Γunmoved = Γ σ atoms

Γσ+π = Γx,y,z • Γσ

5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 13

Oh Γσ T (^) 1u = Γx,y,z Γσ+π

E

8C 3 6C 2

Γσ+π =

6C 4 3C 2 i 6S 4 8S 6 3 σh 2 2 0 0 0 4 1 –1 –3 –1 0 1 2 –2 0 0 0 4

a (^) 1g + eg + t1g + 2t1u + t2g + t2u

6 σd 2 → a1g + t (^) 1u + e (^) g 1 2 → a^ 1g^ + eg^ + t1g^ + 2t1u + t2g + t2u

Γσ = a (^) 1g + t1u + e (^) g

Γ π = Γσ+π – Γσ = t 1g + t1u + t2g + t2u

The σ SALCs have already been derived in Lecture 12. Methods 1-3 of Lecture 12 can be employed to determine the pπ SALCs. For the orbitals that transform as t1u and t2g , Method 3 (mirror the metal atomic orbital symmetry) is convenient. For the t1u SALC,

and 2 others (in the xz and yz planes as defined by the symmetries of the py and px orbitals)

pz ψ t^ ( 11 u^ )^ =

L π 3 + L π 4 + L π 5 + L π 6 )

The t2g SALCs have the mirrored symmetry of the (d (^) xy,dxz,dyz) orbital set,

and 2 others (in the xy and xz planes as defined by the symmetries of the dxy and dxz orbitals)

dyz ψ t^ ( 21 g^ )^ = 1

( L π 1 − L π 2 − L π 4 + L π 6 )

Non-bonding SALCs must be ascertained from projection operators and Schmidt orthogonalization methods.

5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 13

For a π-accepting ligand set, orbitals have the same form (or symmetry) as π donors,

t1u t2g (^1) ⎛ 1 ⎜ ⎝

L π 3 ⎞⎟

L π ⎞⎟

ψ(1)^ = *^ + L π *^ + Lπ *^ + Lπ *^ (1)= *^ − L π *^ − Lπ *^ +Lπ *

t1u 2 4 5 6 t2g 2 1 2 4 6

The only difference between the π-donor and π-acceptor MO diagrams is the relative placement of the π* orbitals relative to the metal atomic orbitals; for Co(CN) 6 3–,

t1u M–L and M–L

3.7 eV (^) 4p see VOIE

7.3 eV

a1g

eg

M–L (dxz

t1u

eg

a1g

t2g

M–L

M–L

M–L (dx (^2) –y 2 , dz 2 )

n.b t1g, t2u (M-L ) t1u

(M-L *) t2g

Co3+^ 6 CN^ – Co(CN) 6 3–

increased energy gap (relative to -only case) owing to participation 9.4 eV (^) 3d of t2g orbitals in M-L see VOIE (^) bond

4s^ 12L * see VOIE

, dyz, dxy) the lone pair HOMO of 6L CO, PES spectrum setsthe energies of these orbitals at 14 eV

5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 13