Understanding Maxwell's Equations: The Foundation of Electromagnetism, Study notes of Physics Fundamentals

An in-depth explanation of maxwell's equations, the fundamental principles of electromagnetism. Learn about gauss's law, the conservation of charge, faraday's law, and ampere's law. Discover the mathematical subtleties and the historical significance of these equations.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/18/2009

koofers-user-9wu-2
koofers-user-9wu-2 🇺🇸

3.3

(3)

9 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
8Electrodynamics
Read: Boas Ch. 6, particularly sec. 10 and 11.
8.1 Maxwell equations
Some of you may have seen Maxwell’s equations on t-shirts or encountered them
briefly in electromagnetism courses. These equations were written down for the first
time by Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell in his “Treatise on Electricity and
Magnetism” (1873), and they caused a stir because his new equations proved that
light was an electromagnetic phenomenon. Imagine that you had no clue that light
and all the phenomena of electricity and magnetism you knew from the laboratory
were related, and someone showed you that you could calculate the speed of some
weird electromagnetic wave solutions to these differential equations, and show that
the speed was exactly that of light (which had been measured astronomically).
Spectacular! With the new tools you possess you can understand the equations at
a deeper level.
Suppose charge is increasing at some rate within a given volume τ. Assume that
we have no “sources” or “sinks” of charge in the system. This means that it has to
come from outside the region. The amount created inside per time has to show up
as a flux of the charge through the boundary of the volume coming from outside
(make sure you understand the sign):
∂t Zvol τ
ρ(~r, t) =Zsurf . ∂τ
~
j·d~a =Zτ
~
·~
j (1)
where the last equality follows from the divergence theorem. Now since we did this
for an arbitrary volume τ, it must hold locally:
∂ρ
∂t +~
·~
j= 0,(2)
the so-called equation of continuity”. This is not thought of as one of Maxwell’s
equations, because it doesn’t contain the electromagnetic fields ~
Eand ~
B, but merely
expresses the conservation of charge. Here are the standard 4:
1. Gauss’s law. For pt. charge,
~
E=q
4π²0r2ˆrZclosed
~
E·d~a =q
4π²0Zˆr·d~a
r2
|{z}
=q
²0
d
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Maxwell's Equations: The Foundation of Electromagnetism and more Study notes Physics Fundamentals in PDF only on Docsity!

8 Electrodynamics

Read: Boas Ch. 6, particularly sec. 10 and 11.

8.1 Maxwell equations

Some of you may have seen Maxwell’s equations on t-shirts or encountered them briefly in electromagnetism courses. These equations were written down for the first time by Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell in his “Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism” (1873), and they caused a stir because his new equations proved that light was an electromagnetic phenomenon. Imagine that you had no clue that light and all the phenomena of electricity and magnetism you knew from the laboratory were related, and someone showed you that you could calculate the speed of some weird electromagnetic wave solutions to these differential equations, and show that the speed was exactly that of light (which had been measured astronomically). Spectacular! With the new tools you possess you can understand the equations at a deeper level. Suppose charge is increasing at some rate within a given volume τ. Assume that we have no “sources” or “sinks” of charge in the system. This means that it has to come from outside the region. The amount created inside per time has to show up as a flux of the charge through the boundary of the volume coming from outside (make sure you understand the sign):

∂ ∂t

vol τ

ρ(~r, t)dτ = −

surf. ∂τ

~j · d~a = −

τ

∇ ·^ ~ ~j dτ (1)

where the last equality follows from the divergence theorem. Now since we did this for an arbitrary volume τ , it must hold locally:

∂ρ ∂t

  • ∇ ·~ ~j = 0, (2)

the so-called “equation of continuity”. This is not thought of as one of Maxwell’s equations, because it doesn’t contain the electromagnetic fields E~ and B~, but merely expresses the conservation of charge. Here are the standard 4:

  1. Gauss’s law. For pt. charge,

E^ ~ = q 4 π≤ 0 r^2

rˆ ⇒

closed

E^ ~ · d~a = q 4 π≤ 0

ˆr · d~a ︸ ︷︷ ︸r^2

q ≤ 0 dΩ

Divergence theorem then says ∫

τ

(∇ ·~ E~) dτ =

τ

ρ(~r)dτ ︸ ︷︷ ︸

⇒ ∇ ·~ E~ =

ρ ︸ ︷︷ ≤^0 ︸

q Maxwell I There are two mathematical subtleties I swept under the rug in this “proof”. First I did it for a point charge, but expressed things in terms of a general charge density at the end. You can go back and convince yourself that if you say the E~-field is a sum of many small charge elements dq each producing a field falling off like 1/r^2 from itself, you get the same answer. Secondly, in the last step we jumped from a statement about equality of integrated quantities to a statement about the equality of the integrands. Normally this is a no-no, but here it’s ok since we are talking about a relation which is valid for any ρ distribution. We’ll see the underlying reason for this kind of argument when we talk about function spaces.

  1. No magnetic charge.

∇ ·^ ~ B = 0 ︸ ︷︷ ︸.^ (4) Maxwell II You can make an analogous mathematical argument for the magnetic field, but since we don’t know about any particles which carry magnetic charge (yet), we set the right hand side equal to zero.

  1. Faraday’s law. ∮

loop

E^ ~ · d~r = −dΦB dt

d dt

surface A=∂ loop

B^ ~ · d~a. (5)

Now use Stokes’ theorem: ∫

A

(∇ ×~ E~) · d~a =

E^ ~ · d~r = −

A

∂ B~

∂t

· d~a, (6)

where we assumed that the loop over which the

was taken was fixed in time (only field was changing), so we could bring the time derivative inside the integral and apply it to the B~ only. But now again we have integrals left and right over the same surface (this time), and the surface A is arbitrary, so the only way the equation can hold is if

∇ ×^ ~ E~ = −∂

B~

︸ ︷︷ ∂t︸

Maxwell III

electric field, such as that which exists on the capacitor plate when charge is building up there. Maxwell guessed a generalization of Amp`ere’s law:

∇ ×^ ~ B~ = μ 0 (~j + ~jd) ; ~jd ≡ ≤ 0 ∂

E~

∂t

Now applying Stokes’ law we get that the right hand side should be just like 10, except we replace ~j with ~j +~jd. The second term ~jd is called the displace- ment current; it has the dimensions of a current, but does not correspond to transport of charge. And we find that it doesn’t depend any more which surface we choose, since

S

(~j + ~jd) · d~a =

S′

(~j + ~jd) · d~a. (12)

For the first term ∂ ∂tE~ = 0 over the surface S, which may be taken far from the capacitor, the displacement current is zero, but the physical current is nonzero. For S′, which passes mostly near the capacitor’s surface, there’s no physical current, but the charge is building up so E~ is changing with time. Thus the current is exclusively displacement in nature.

Have we fixed the continuity problem? Take the divergence of both sides of (11), and using ∇ ·~ ∇ ×~ ~v = 0 ∀~v, we find

0 = μ 0 ∇ ·~ ~j + ∇ ·~ μ 0 ≤ 0

∂t

E~ (13)

= μ 0

∇ ·^ ~ ~j + ∂ρ ∂t

where in the last step I used Coulomb’s law ∇ ·~ E~ = ρ/≤ 0. So continuity is satisfied (charge conserved), so we can all rest easy in our beds. For complete- ness, let me then record our answer from Maxwell for the modified Amp`ere’s law:

∇ ×^ ~ B~ = μ 0 ~j + μ 0 ≤ 0 ∂

E~

︸ ︷︷ ∂t︸

Maxwell IV

Some examples of the math of E& M:

  • Gauss law. Ball of radius R, constant chg. density ρ, could sum up the electric field contributions d E~ from all infinitesimal charge elements dq, or use divergence theorem and Poisson equation ∇ ·~ E~ = ρ/≤ 0. For a “Gaussian sphere” A, radius r > R, ∫

A

E^ ~ · d~a =

A

E(r)da = 4πr^2 E(r) =

τ

ρdτ =

πR^3

ρ ≤ 0

∴ E(r) =

4 3 πR

(^3) ρ 4 π≤ 0 r^2

Q

4 π≤ 0 r^2

where recall the symmetry argument that the field must be radial due to the spherical symmetry of the charge distribution was crucial. For r < R,

4 πr^2 E =

πr^3

ρ ≤ 0

⇒ E =

ρ 3 ≤ 0

r (18)

Reminder: how do we find the potential φ, given E~?

φB − φA = −

∫ B

A

E^ ~ · d~r (19)

Choose reference point φ(r → ∞ = 0,

φ(r > R) = −

∫ (^) r

Q

4 πr^2 ≤ 0

dr =

Q

4 π≤ 0 r

φ(r < R) − φ(R) = −

∫ (^) r

R

ρ 3 ≤ 0

rdr = −

ρ 6 ≤ 0

(r^2 − R^2 ) (21)

Q

r^2 − R^2 4 3 πR 3

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 r

Φ

Figure 2: Potential of solid sphere of charge in units of Q/π≤ 0 R.

  • Gauge transformations.

Maxwell II: ∇ ·~ B~ = 0 ⇒ B~ = ∇ ×~ A,~ A~ = vector pot. (28)

Maxwell III: ∇ ×~ E~ = −

∂ B~

∂t

⇒ E~ = −∇~φ −

∂ A~

∂t

φ = scalar potential. (30)

Note: A, φ~ are not unique. If Λ is any function of space and time, we can make the changes

A^ ~ → A~ + ∇~Λ, φ → φ − ∂Λ ∂t

without changing the fields E, ~ B~. Check!