Lecture Notes on Sinusoidal Steady, State Analysis | ECE 2300, Study notes of Electrical Circuit Analysis

Material Type: Notes; Professor: Shattuck; Class: Circuit Analysis; Subject: (Electrical and Comp Engr); University: University of Houston; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-e94
koofers-user-e94 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 19

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Circuit Analysis - ECE 2300
LECTURE NOTES
DAVE SHATTUCK
SET #5
Chapter 9 - Sinusoidal Steady-State Analysis
Now we take on two major paradigm shifts,
which are closely related. What we do in this
chapter is:
1. Define what we mean by “steady state”
when we have sinusoidal sources.
2. Define “phasors.”
3. Introduce a new solution technique, called
phasor analysis.
4. Introduce and define “RMS.”
First, I wish to introduce the first
engineering paradigm, Fourier’s Theorem.
Before we go on, the pronunciation.
Everyone repeat, after me, 4-E-A. Furriers are
people who make coats.
Fourier’s Theorem - Any physically
realizable signal can be represented by, and is
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13

Partial preview of the text

Download Lecture Notes on Sinusoidal Steady, State Analysis | ECE 2300 and more Study notes Electrical Circuit Analysis in PDF only on Docsity!

Circuit Analysis - ECE 2300

LECTURE NOTES

DAVE SHATTUCK

SET

Chapter 9 - Sinusoidal Steady-State Analysis

Now we take on two major paradigm shifts,

which are closely related. What we do in this

chapter is:

  1. Define what we mean by “steady state”

when we have sinusoidal sources.

  1. Define “phasors.”
  2. Introduce a new solution technique, called

phasor analysis.

  1. Introduce and define “RMS.”

First, I wish to introduce the first

engineering paradigm, Fourier’s Theorem.

Before we go on, the pronunciation.

Everyone repeat, after me, 4-E-A. Furriers are

people who make coats.

Fourier’s Theorem - Any physically

realizable signal can be represented by, and is

equivalent to, a summation of sinusoids of

different frequency, phase and amplitude.

This theorem has profound implications, and

has effectively shaped the way that we look at

almost all of electrical engineering. It is

remarkably powerful. It is profound. I am still

not sure that I believe it. But, apparently, it is

true.

Now, through special mathematical

techniques, called phasor analysis, the solution

of complex differential equations, that describe

circuits and their responses, can be found

easily (relatively speaking), as long as the

sources are sinusoidal. By Fourier’s Theorem,

ultimately, all sources are sinusoidal.

Thus, we have a simple technique with

universal application. This is almost too good

to be true.

There are two hitches. It may require an

infinite number of sinusoidal components to

v(t) = V m

cos (t + )

where V m

is the amplitude,  is the frequency,

and  is the phase of the sinusoid. Note that if

T is the period of the sinusoid (or any periodic

source), then

f = 1 / T

and

 = 2πf. f.

The frequency f typically has units of [cycles/s]

or [Hertz] or [Hz] = [s

]. The variable  is

called the angular frequency, and typically has

units of [radians/s], or [rad/s]. It is very

important to keep these two quantities straight.

Thus t has typical units of [radians]. The

phase shift  has typical units of [degrees] or

[deg]. This can be awkward. We need to be

very careful, especially when we evaluate

sinusoids. Fortunately, we do not do this very

often in this course.

We now define RMS. This means Root-

Mean-Squared. It is a value that is associated

with periodic functions. It has some

particularly valuable information with regard to

average power calculations using periodic

functions. However, for the time being, we will

simply say that we can calculate the RMS

value of any periodic function by taking the

square root of the mean value of the squared

function. Some important notes:

  1. In order to get this value, we take the

inverse order. We square the function, then

take the mean value of that squared function,

and then take the square root of that mean

value. So, we do SMR.

  1. We take the RMS value of periodic

functions, that is, functions that vary with time.

However, since the RMS function includes a

mean value, the RMS value is not a function

of time.

i(t) = {-V

m

(R

L

1/2 } cos () e

(R/L) t

{V

m

(R

L

1/2 } cos (t + )

where

 = arctan (L / R)

Let us examine this solution.

  1. The first term is not sinusoidal (with time).

Rather, it is a decaying exponential. It dies out

with time. After several ’s, it is gone. This is

called the transient response.

  1. The second term is sinusoidal (with time).

It does not die out. This called the steady-

state response.

We will only be able to use phasor analysis to

get the steady-state solution, but this may be

all we want. Some fun facts to know and tell

about the steady-state solution.

  1. The steady-state solution is a sinusoidal

function.

  1. The frequency of the steady-state solution

is the same as that of the source.

  1. The amplitude of the steady-state solution

can be different from that of the source.

  1. The phase of the steady-state solution can

be different from that of the source.

Thus, when we want to solve for the steady-

state solution with sinusoidal sources, we want

to get two things: the amplitude and the

phase. Everything else is already known.

Section 9.3 - The Phasor

Remember Euler’s relation:

e

j = cos  + j sin 

So, we can say that

v(t) = V m

cos (t + ) = V m

Re {e

j( 

where Re means the real part of the

expression that follows.

We will always use an m subscript when we

use magnitude based phasors.

We can also define the Inverse Phasor

Transform. Here, if we put in the phasor, we

get the sinusoid out. Remember that we knew

the frequency from the beginning. When we

are in the phasor domain, it is understood that

the frequency is known. Also, we assume that

when we take the inverse transform, that we

know whether the magnitude of the phasor is

the zero to peak, or rms value, and convert

accordingly.

We will take phasors with magnitude values

sometimes, and with rms values sometimes.

We will use notation to make it clear which one

we are using.

Let us solve a problem the hard way, to make

a point. I am going to work through all the

steps. Often, in this class, we skip this

process. However, here we will try to meet two

goals:

  1. Several steps in the solution will make clear

what is going on in the simpler approach.

  1. We will see why we never want to do this

again.

Take the RL circuit from before. (Draw it

again, showing the series voltage source,

resistor and inductor.)

We want the steady-state solution for i(t),

which we will call i ss

(t). From our previous

analysis, we know that

i ss

(t) = I m

cos (t + ) = I m

Re {e

j(t e

j( 

We want I m

and .

Now, v S

= Ri + L di/dt, and since i ss

(t) has got

to work in this equation, we can plug it in to

get:

V

m

Re {e

j(t e

j(  = R I m

Re {e

j(t e

j(  +

L d/dt [I

m

Re {e

j(t e

j(

Note that this equation is not a function of t.

Next, we factor out I m

and e

j( out of the

terms, and write

V

m

e

j( = I m

e

j( (R + jL)

We solve for I m

e

j( to get

V

m

e

j( / (R + jL)

= I

m

e

j( Equation

Now, how many equations do we have here?

Ans: There only appears to be one equation,

but it is a complex equation. Thus, the real

parts must be equal (1 equation) and the

imaginary parts must be equal (1 equation).

This is 2 equations. It is also true that the

magnitudes must be equal and the phases

must be equal, which give us two more

equations, but they are not independent. We

can pick either pair and solve for our two

unknowns.

So, we can solve Equation #1 for I m

and .

and we get the solution for

i ss

(t) = I m

cos (t + )

Our goal now is to find a quicker way to get to

Equation #1. That’s what phasor analysis will

give us. Notice that we can always divide

through by e

jt

. This will always give us an

equation which is independent of time. We

can rewrite Equation #1 in terms of phasors, as

_ _

V

R,m

= R I

max

If we take the ratio of these two, we get

_ _

V

R,m

/ I

R,m

= R which is called Complex

Ohm’s Law.

Inductor: Suppose that

i L

(t) = I max

cos (t + ),

then, by the defining equation of an inductor,

we have

v L

(t) = -L  I max

sin (t + ).

By basic trig relationships, we can write

v L

(t) = -L  I max

cos (t +  - 90 ° ).

Now,

_

I

L,m

= I

max

and

_

V

L,m

= - L  I

max

Putting this back in its exponential form, we

see that

V

L,m

= - L  I

max

e

j e

j(-90 ° )

which is equal to

V

L,m

= - L  I

max

e

j (-j) = jL I max

e

j

If we take the ratio of these two, we get

_ _

V

L,m

/ I

L,m

= jL.

If this has a name, I don’t know what it is.

Please be careful. It is not useful, nor typical

for us to take the ratio for an inductor in the

time domain. If we take

v L

(t) / i L

(t) = -L  I max

sin(t + ) / I max

cos(t + )

= -L  tan(t + ).

This function is sometimes zero, sometimes ,

and sometimes -. It is not equal to jL.

By a similar approach, we can find that

_ _

  1. Solve the resulting circuit using the

impedances in the same way that you would

use resistances.

  1. Convert the phasor voltage/current that yo

obtain back to a time domain voltage/current.

Do not skip step 4.

Take special care not to mix domains at any

time. There should never be a t (for time) in

the phasor domain. There should never be a j

(square root of -1) in the time domain. A single

diagram should never have components or

voltages or currents labelled from both

domains.

Let’s do some examples.