Do-Support Rule and Negation in Transformational Grammar, Lecture notes of Grammar and Composition

The do-support rule and negation in transformational grammar. The do-support rule is used when the tense is followed by a non-verbal item and cannot stand alone, requiring a dummy verb 'do' to be supplied. Negation is another important rule that negates the tense by adding 'not' after it. Examples and rules for applying these transformations.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 08/05/2022

hal_s95
hal_s95 ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ

4.4

(655)

10K documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lesson #13
Rule III: Do-Support Rule.
In some sentences, a do-support has to be supplied.
Tense โ€“ (NP) Do-supp. Tense-do- (NP)
-- >
Here is an example:
Surface structure: Did Wattana meet him?
Kernel sentence: Wattana met him.
Analysis: Wattana โ€“ past. โ€“ meet โ€“ him.
Interrogative rule: past โ€“ Wattana โ€“ meet โ€“ him
Here is a situation where, as a result of the interrogative rule, only the tense is
placed outside the NP as there is no be or have or modal attached to the tense. Now,
the tense is a Bound Morpheme. It cannot stand alone. It must be attached to some
verbal element (not to any NP like Wattana). Therefore, a dummy verb, namely do, is
supplied here to be attached to the tense. This rule is called the do-support rule. It
states: โ€˜Support the tense with do when the tense is followed by a non-verbal itemโ€™.
So the third step in the above series of transformations is:
Do โ€“ support: past โ€“ do โ€“ Wattana โ€“ meet โ€“ him.
Now, one can apply the affix-switch rule.
Affix: do โ€“ past โ€“ Wattan โ€“ meet โ€“ him
(did)
Another example:
Derive the structure: Did Bunjob accept your proposal?
Kernel sentence: Bunjob accepted your proposal.
Analysis: Bunjob โ€“ past โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal.
Interrogative rule: past. โ€“ Bunjob โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal.
Do-support: past โ€“ do โ€“ Bunjob โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal.
Affix: do โ€“ past โ€“ Bunjob โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal.
(did)
Wh โ€“type questions
In order to derive why-questions, two more transformation rules have to be
applied. These rule are:
1. wh โ€“ substitution
2. wh โ€“ fronting
The following examples will make it clear as to how, and in what order, these
rules are applied.
Surface structure: Why did you kick him?
Kernel: You kicked him for some reason.
Analysis: you โ€“ past โ€“ kick โ€“ him โ€“ for some reason.
Wh โ€“ subs: you โ€“ past โ€“ kick โ€“ him โ€“ why.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Do-Support Rule and Negation in Transformational Grammar and more Lecture notes Grammar and Composition in PDF only on Docsity!

Lesson

Rule III: Do-Support Rule. In some sentences, a do-support has to be supplied.

Tense โ€“ (NP) Do-supp. Tense-do- (NP) -- >

Here is an example: Surface structure: Did Wattana meet him? Kernel sentence: Wattana met him. Analysis: Wattana โ€“ past. โ€“ meet โ€“ him. Interrogative rule: past โ€“ Wattana โ€“ meet โ€“ him

Here is a situation where, as a result of the interrogative rule, only the tense is placed outside the NP as there is no be or have or modal attached to the tense. Now, the tense is a Bound Morpheme. It cannot stand alone. It must be attached to some verbal element (not to any NP like Wattana). Therefore, a dummy verb, namely do , is supplied here to be attached to the tense. This rule is called the do-support rule. It states: โ€˜Support the tense with do when the tense is followed by a non-verbal itemโ€™. So the third step in the above series of transformations is: Do โ€“ support: past โ€“ do โ€“ Wattana โ€“ meet โ€“ him. Now, one can apply the affix-switch rule. Affix: do โ€“ past โ€“ Wattan โ€“ meet โ€“ him

(did)

Another example: Derive the structure: Did Bunjob accept your proposal? Kernel sentence: Bunjob accepted your proposal. Analysis: Bunjob โ€“ past โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal. Interrogative rule: past. โ€“ Bunjob โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal. Do-support: past โ€“ do โ€“ Bunjob โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal. Affix: do โ€“ past โ€“ Bunjob โ€“ accept โ€“ your โ€“ proposal.

(did)

Wh โ€“ type questions In order to derive why-questions, two more transformation rules have to be applied. These rule are:

  1. wh โ€“ substitution
  2. wh โ€“ fronting The following examples will make it clear as to how, and in what order, these rules are applied. Surface structure: Why did you kick him? Kernel: You kicked him for some reason. Analysis: you โ€“ past โ€“ kick โ€“ him โ€“ for some reason. Wh โ€“ subs: you โ€“ past โ€“ kick โ€“ him โ€“ why.

Interrogative rule: past โ€“ you โ€“ kick โ€“ him- why. Wh โ€“ front: why โ€“ past โ€“ you โ€“ kick โ€“ him. Do โ€“ supp. why โ€“ past โ€“ do โ€“ you โ€“ kick โ€“ him. Affix: why โ€“ do โ€“ past โ€“ you โ€“ kick โ€“ him.

(did) The order in which the T-Rules are applied are:

  1. W - Who-substitutions
  2. I - Interrogative rule
  3. W - Wh-fronting
  4. D - Do-support
  5. A - Affix-switch rule A kernel sentence may need some or all of these transformations to arrive at the surface structure. The order of transformation rules, however, remains the same in all cases.

More Examples:

  1. Where did you go yesterday? Kernel: You went somewhere yesterday. Analysis: you โ€“ past โ€“ go โ€“ somewhere โ€“ yesterday. Wh-sub: you โ€“ past โ€“ go โ€“ where โ€“ yesterday. Interr.: past โ€“ you โ€“ go โ€“ where โ€“ yesterday. Wh-front: where โ€“ past โ€“ you โ€“ go โ€“ yesterday. Do-supp.: where โ€“ past โ€“ do โ€“ you โ€“ go โ€“ yesterday. Affix: where โ€“ do โ€“ past โ€“ you โ€“ go โ€“ yesterday.

(did)

  1. How did you learn all that? Kernel: You learnt all this somehow. Analysis: you โ€“ past โ€“ learn โ€“ all this โ€“ somehow. Wh-sub: you โ€“ past โ€“ learn โ€“ all this โ€“ how. Interr.: past โ€“ you โ€“ learn - how โ€“ all this. Wh-front: how โ€“ past โ€“ you - learn โ€“ all this. Do-supp.: how โ€“ past โ€“ do โ€“ you โ€“ learn โ€“ all this. Affix: How โ€“ do โ€“ past โ€“ you โ€“ learn โ€“ all this.

(did)

  1. When has she returned from Bangkok? Kernel: She has returned form Bangkok at sometime. Analysis: she โ€“ pres. โ€“ have โ€“ en โ€“ return โ€“ from โ€“ Bangkok โ€“ at some time. Wh-sub: she โ€“ pres. โ€“ have โ€“ en โ€“ return โ€“ from โ€“ Bangkok โ€“ when. Wh-front: When โ€“ pres. โ€“ have โ€“ she โ€“ en โ€“ return โ€“ form Bangkok.

Tense Neg. Tense - not -- >

Examples:

  1. Surface structure: I will not walk. Deep structure or Kernel sentence: I will walk. Analysis: I โ€“ pres. โ€“ will โ€“ walk. Neg.: I โ€“ pres. โ€“ will โ€“ not โ€“ walk. Affix: I โ€“ will โ€“ pres. โ€“ not โ€“ walk. (will)
  2. Surface structure: She did not sleep. Kernel: She slept. Analysis: she โ€“ past โ€“ sleep. Neg.: she โ€“ past โ€“ not โ€“ sleep. Do-supp.: she โ€“ past โ€“ do โ€“ not โ€“ sleep. Affix: she โ€“ do โ€“ past โ€“ not โ€“ go.

(did) Negative Contraction Rule

Not neg. cont. -- > nโ€™t

Note: When โ€˜ not โ€™ is contracted to nโ€™t , it is attached closely to the verbal item preceding it, i.e. to modal, be or tense, nโ€™t moves wherever these items move. Examples:

  1. Did not he play tennis?
  2. Is not she a fool?
  3. Why did not you speak the truth?