


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Note: This video tells the story of the Watergate scandal entirely through primary source news footage, without added narration.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



A break-in at the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in 1972 leads to congressional hearings that result in the historic resignation of President Richard M. Nixon. Original news footage from seven reporters retells the story that brought down a presidency.
Note: This video tells the story of the Watergate scandal entirely through primary source news footage, without added narration.
AUDIENCE: High school and college
TIME: Under 30 minutes (5-minute video and 20-minute class discussion)
MATERIALS: “Watergate” Viewing Guide worksheet (download), an Internet connection to watch “Watergate” video, “Watergate” handout (download, optional), teacher key
PREPARE Print copies of the viewing guide worksheet, one per student.
DO
DISCUSS You may wish to assign one or more of these questions as short essays for homework. John Mitchell stated: “Neither the president nor anyone in the White House, or anybody in authority in any of the committees working for the re-election of the president, have any responsibility for [the Watergate break-in].” Evidence showed this was a lie. How should journalists report statements that are not true? Is it a journalist’s job to call a lie a lie, or just to report what was said? “The Washington Post” used anonymous sources for much of the information that appeared in its Watergate reporting. What is an anonymous/unnamed source? What are the pros and cons of using unnamed sources? The press is sometimes referred to as a “watchdog” in our society. How is the press a watchdog? Whom is it watching, and why? Why is this role important in a democracy? How should reporters evaluate whether or not to publish information that could harm an individual or jeopardize a person’s job? When is it ethical (right) to publish this information?
When is it unethical (wrong)? How did the White House fight back against the accusations the news media published? Were these tactics effective? Imagine you are the editor of a large newspaper, and two young reporters come to you with a story they say could lead to the impeachment of the president. What questions would you ask these reporters? What evidence would you want to see? How would you decide whether or not to publish their story? The live TV broadcasts of the Watergate hearings in 1973 were a big deal. How do you think these live broadcasts affected the course of events? What types of hearings are going on in government today? Would you prefer to watch these hearings live or read/watch a report about them after the fact? Why?
EXTENSION ACTIVITIES