

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The dyadic-level and organizational level in international relations. The dyadic-level emphasizes the shared characteristics or interaction pattern of states, while the organizational level highlights that states are not unitary actors and are comprised of various organizations. The document also explains the Spiral Model, patterns of states' behavior, and the Deterrence Model. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining credible threats to deter war occurrence and lead to peace.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Dyadic-Level ● Dyad→ a pair of two member states in the international system ● Emphasizes the shared characteristics or interaction pattern of states ○ Aesop’s fable to the north wind and the sun→ persuasion is better than force The Spiral Model ● Security dilemma creates conflict spirals ● State behavior is a response to other states’ behavior; emphasizes dyadic relations between states Patterns of states’ behavior ● Reciprocity ○ Each state of a dyad responds to the actions of the other in a proportionate way ● Escalation ○ Each state of a dyad responds to the actions of the other with more hostile and aggressive reactions ● Asymmetrical escalation ○ One state of a dyad escalates, and the counterpart state remains the same ● De-escalation pattern ○ One state of a dyad reacts to its counterpart by responding with actions that are less hostile and more conciliatory Deterrence Model ● If you want peace, prepare for war ● Deterrence→ a state’s ability to prevent another state from doing something that contradicts its own interests ● Maintaining credible threats deters war occurrence and leads to peace ● Emphasizes retaliatory punishment Organizational Level ● States are not unitary actors. They are comprised of a variety of organizations. ● Ex: Joint Chiefs of Staff ○ Chairman ○ Vice Chairman ○ Chief of Staff of the Army ○ Chief of Naval Operations ○ Chief of Staff of the Air Force ○ Commandant of the Marine Corps ○ Chief of the National Guard Bureau ○ Chief of Space Operations
● Organizations often disagree and compete with one another. “Where you stand is where you sit” ● Organizations may propose policy options that are linked to their institutional interests ● Foreign policy decisions are the result of bargaining and compromise among organizations (“pulling and hauling”) ● Organizations make decisions based on their own standard operating procedures (SOPs) ○ Set of pre-existing routines or guidelines ○ Heuristics for organizations ● Foreign policy is sometimes the result of organizational routines Incrementalism ● Organizations make foreign policies, bit by bit, in a slow fashion rather than with radical changes ● Why incremental choice? ○ Organizations can make efficient decisions ○ They may be able to prevent catastrophic mistakes by minimizing the possibility of unexpected consequences. (damage limitation strategy) ○ Politically viable solution ● Ex: US escalation in Vietnam War What is War? ● War is… ○ “The father of all things” – Heraclitus ■ War between human beings determines their destiny ○ “The most potent narcotic unleashed by mankind” –Hedge ■ People who wage war find it exhilarating ○ “Too serious a matter to entrust to military men” – Clemenceau ○ “The last refuge of the incompetent” – Asimov