



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The proposition p ↔ q, read “p if and only if q”, is called bicon- ditional. It is true precisely when p and q have the same truth value, i.e., they are both ...
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




1.1. Propositions
A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false (but not both). For instance, the following are propositions: “Paris is in France” (true), “London is in Denmark” (false), “2 < 4” (true), “4 = 7 (false)”. However the following are not propositions: “what is your name?” (this is a question), “do your homework” (this is a command), “this sentence is false” (neither true nor false), “x is an even number” (it depends on what x represents), “Socrates” (it is not even a sentence). The truth or falsehood of a proposition is called its truth value.
1.1.1. Connectives, Truth Tables. Connectives are used for making compound propositions. The main ones are the following (p and q represent given propositions):
Name Represented Meaning Negation ¬p “not p” Conjunction p ∧ q “p and q” Disjunction p ∨ q “p or q (or both)” Exclusive Or p ⊕ q “either p or q, but not both” Implication p → q “if p then q” Biconditional p ↔ q “p if and only if q”
The truth value of a compound proposition depends only on the value of its components. Writing F for “false” and T for “true”, we can summarize the meaning of the connectives in the following way:
6
p q ¬p p ∧ q p ∨ q p ⊕ q p → q p ↔ q T T F T T F T T T F F F T T F F F T T F T T T F F F T F F F T T
Note that ∨ represents a non-exclusive or, i.e., p ∨ q is true when any of p, q is true and also when both are true. On the other hand ⊕ represents an exclusive or, i.e., p ⊕ q is true only when exactly one of p and q is true.
1.1.2. Tautology, Contradiction, Contingency.
p ¬p p ∨ ¬p p ∧ ¬p T F T F T F T F F T T F F T T F 6 6 tautology contradiction
1.1.3. Conditional Propositions. A proposition of the form “if p then q” or “p implies q”, represented “p → q” is called a conditional proposition. For instance: “if John is from Chicago then John is from Illinois”. The proposition p is called hypothesis or antecedent, and the proposition q is the conclusion or consequent.
Note that p → q is true always except when p is true and q is false. So, the following sentences are true: “if 2 < 4 then Paris is in France” (true → true), “if London is in Denmark then 2 < 4” (false → true),
p q ¬p ¬q p ∨ q ¬(p ∨ q) ¬p ∧ ¬q p ∧ q ¬(p ∧ q) ¬p ∨ ¬q T T F F T F F T F F T F F T T F F F T T F T T F T F F F T T F F T T F T T F T T
Example: The following propositions are logically equivalent:
p ↔ q ≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Again, this can be checked with the truth tables:
p q p → q q → p (p → q) ∧ (q → p) p ↔ q T T T T T T T F F T F F F T T F F F F F T T T T
Exercise: Check the following logical equivalences:
¬(p → q) ≡ p ∧ ¬q p → q ≡ ¬q → ¬p ¬(p ↔ q) ≡ p ⊕ q
1.1.5. Converse, Contrapositive. The converse of a conditional proposition p → q is the proposition q → p. As we have seen, the bi- conditional proposition is equivalent to the conjunction of a conditional proposition an its converse.
p ↔ q ≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
So, for instance, saying that “John is married if and only if he has a spouse” is the same as saying “if John is married then he has a spouse” and “if he has a spouse then he is married”.
Note that the converse is not equivalent to the given conditional proposition, for instance “if John is from Chicago then John is from Illinois” is true, but the converse “if John is from Illinois then John is from Chicago” may be false.
The contrapositive of a conditional proposition p → q is the propo- sition ¬q → ¬p. They are logically equivalent. For instance the con- trapositive of “if John is from Chicago then John is from Illinois” is “if John is not from Illinois then John is not from Chicago”.