







Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An overview of Long Term Athlete Development (LTAD), a framework for optimizing youth hockey player development. LTAD focuses on continual skill development, understanding of the game, and individual growth within a team setting. the importance of LTAD during the crucial period of physical development for athletes under 12 years old, and how it can lead to improved decision-making skills, increased speed, and spatial awareness. The document also highlights the influence of coaches and the role of the American Development Model in raising standards for youth hockey.
Typology: Slides
1 / 13
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!








DR. STEVE NORRIS
Rationale Behind the American Development Model USA Hockey started with a review of research that has taken place in child and athletic development around the globe. Elite performance studies from multiple sport bodies, governments as well as other endeavors such as music and the arts were evaluated. Through the review of current research, it was quickly concluded that to truly address player development, a completely new way of looking at USA Hockey’s structure must be undertaken. Critical development begins at a very early age. As children mature, they each progress during the same developmental stages through the growth and maturation process. Along this path, certain aspects of these stages must be addressed at the appropriate time intervals. Without developing skills and certain physical and mental attributes at the proper time, the long-term prospects of becoming a truly elite athlete are diminished. Research has shown that we cannot just focus on a few older players; an encompassing strategy must be followed. As we evaluated the current research, variations of Istvan Balyi’s long-term athlete development (LTAD) principles are being employed around the globe by more than 100 government health ministries and sport National Governing Bodies. Within hockey, there is no doubt that countries like Sweden, Finland and the Czech Republic produce high- end NHL players. Their numbers are especially impressive when one considers the populations and player numbers from those counties. In each of those countries, long-term athlete development principles are at the core of their development model. Long-term athlete development is a generic, conceptual framework for athlete development in sport that can be used as a basis on which to ‘re-align,’ or make more consistent, existing systems and structures. It has been developed by Istvan Balyi, an internationally recognized coach educator, and is based upon a consensus of evidenced research about how young people develop sporting ability, linking more closely the coaching and development of players to their physical and psychological growth.
The ADM is a long-term athlete development plan for the sport of ice hockey. It takes into consideration the guiding LTAD principles that are widely accepted around the globe. Consistent with LTAD, the ADM:
Windows of Optimal Trainability There are identifiable stages during a child’s physical and psychological development that offer optimum opportunities to develop particular attributes, such as basic movement skills (agility, balance, coordination and speed), basic sports skills (running, jumping, throwing, skating and striking) and physical capacities (flexibility, endurance, and strength). Missing these optimum opportunities has been shown to significantly affect a child’s ability to reach his or her full potential. In our current system, training in early years focuses on outcomes (winning) rather than the developmental process (optimal training). As Balyi states, “Damage done between ages 6-10 and 10-16 cannot be fully corrected (players/ athletes will never reach their genetic potential) and national training or sport centers receiving mediocre athletes, regardless of funding and expertise, cannot recover from the ‘damages’ of earlier training.” Elite player development and a sound structure at the 12 & Under level for broad-based skill development are not mutually exclusive. What do we currently produce in the U.S.? We have an over abundance of average players and very few truly elite players at the highest levels (NHL), especially when our numbers are taken into consideration. This is due to a lack of the proper focus on training through the appropriate ‘windows of optimal trainability.’ Diagram 8-1 illustrates windows of optimal trainability for male and female athletes. These critical windows provide accelerated adaptation to training and, if skipped or missed, decrease a child’s chance to reach his or her full potential. It must be kept in mind that all systems are always trainable, yet with smaller degrees of adaptation to training over time. In our current system, the window of opportunity on skills development (9-12) for male players is missed through over-competition and under-training.
These critical periods vary between individuals as each child is unique in his or her genetic makeup. While these critical periods follow general stages of human growth and maturation, scientific evidence shows that humans vary considerably in the magnitude and rate of response to different training stimuli at all stages. Some players may show potential for excellence at age 11, while others may not indicate their promise until age 15 or 16. Consequently, a long-term approach to player development is needed to ensure that players who respond slowly to training stimuli are not ‘shortchanged’ in their development. The five trainable physical capacities and windows of optimal trainability are:
“Training Age” refers to the age at which athletes begin planned, regular, serious involvement in training. The tempo of a child’s growth has significant implications for athletic training because children who mature at an early age have a major advantage during the Training to Train stage compared to average or late maturers. However, after all athletes have gone through their growth spurt, it is often later maturers who have greater potential to become top athletes provided that they experience quality coaching throughout that period (see Diagram 8-3). Not all players have the potential to become elite players. The American Development Model recognizes this by offering two levels of content from the Train to Train stage forward. The high performance content is aimed at those players who have been identified and who choose to attempt to be potential elite performers, while the standard content offers a reduced level of commitment more appropriate to the majority of players who will form the basis of club teams of the future. The split between the levels of content at the early part of the Train to Train stage are relatively small as it is deemed to be such an important stage in developing a broader base of potential elite players. However, the differentiation between hockey and other sports may necessitate the divergence at this stage. It is important to note that research suggests that there can be numerous players who follow the standard track through the Train to Train and into the Train to Compete stages who will have the potential to become elite performers. This is especially true if they have a diverse sports movement background through playing multiple sports during the FUNdamemtal and Learn to Train stages.
Periodization Periodization is the practice of segmenting the calendar year into appropriate time intervals for preparation, competition and rest and recovery. Athletes at different stages of their development require different training plans to optimize their development through their growth and maturation. The science behind periodization has been used on the international stage with great success in many, many sports. Unfortunately, sometimes a sport’s traditions are placed in front of the athlete’s needs when planning a periodization schedule. This has an impact on maximizing the player’s development. The Great One’s Message to Parents: Let Your Kids Have Fun “In youth hockey, in most cases, it’s really important for kids to play other sports, whether it’s indoor lacrosse or soccer or baseball. I think what that does is two things. One, each sport helps the other sport. And then I think taking time off in the off-season - that three or four month window really rejuvenates kids so when they come back at the end of August, they’re more excited. They think, ‘All right, hockey’s back, I’m ready to go.’” — Wayne Gretzky. Gretzky was a multi-sport athlete himself growing up, as he also excelled in baseball and lacrosse, quoted from “Great One’s Message to Parents: Let Your Kids Have Fun” (Globe and Mail, 9/26/2008 – Eric Duhatschek). Training to Competition Ratios Through a child’s growth and maturation, the athletic development model needs change through different stages. The appropriate training-to-competition ratios need to be adhered to in order to maximize a player’s time and potential. When a heavy emphasis is placed on competition at an early age, two situations occur. First, ice time is directed toward games, which reduces the amount of quality deliberate practice time. And second, the focus becomes more outcome based (winning) and less process driven (learning the game). There are all kinds of arguments put forth as to why we must allow the imbalance in our training-to-competition ratios to continue, and certainly the one-to-one ratio has its place within the recreational Hockey for Life track. However, for our Tier I, Tier II and high performance players that are part of our elite development path, the correct ratios must be adhered to at the appropriate ages. System Alignment The framework for long-term athlete development is influenced by many factors. We have clubs, schools and ice arena facilities all with varying interests. To maximize a player’s development needs, it is important those entities work together and become mutually supportive as each has its part to play in advancing our game. Players will best develop in a system that is clearly defined, logically structured and based upon consistent principles. We need a structure that is athlete centered and looks at the individual player’s development. In a team sport, it is appropriate to look at the collective whole and to provide the direction and lessons that only a team sport can provide. However, we must always consider that each individual is at a different point through the stages of his or her development (early maturer or late maturer, for example). The goal is to define our sports system with a pathway that addresses the needs of each individual and maximizes their development as they progress through our system. The LTAD principles show us that at the earlier ages, both the Hockey for Life group and the ones that end up as high-performance player, should initially be held to the same pathway. Our current sport system mistakenly allows for the separation of the perceived Hockey for Life group and the perceived high-performance group before any reliable determination can possibly be made. To maximize each player’s potential, we need the major parties to re-evaluate current practices and base new practices on current legitimate research instead of
NOTEPAD: