LSAT Logical Reasoning: Questions and Answers, Exams of Biology

A comprehensive overview of logical reasoning concepts relevant to the lsat exam. It covers various question types, argument structures, and strategies for narrowing down correct answers. Key topics include deductive and inductive arguments, conditional reasoning (if/then statements), and common logical fallacies. The document also offers practical tips for approaching logical reasoning questions, such as identifying premises, assumptions, and conclusions, and applying logical rules effectively. It is designed to help students develop critical thinking skills and improve their performance on the lsat logical reasoning section.

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 06/06/2025

tutor-lee-1
tutor-lee-1 🇺🇸

4.3

(3)

11K documents

1 / 85

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
LSAT: Logical
Reasoning exam
questions fully
solved & updated
What are the basic steps to approaching
a question? - answer 1. Stop to consider
what the question is really asking
2. Decide how I'll approach the question
(ex. organizing info in a table)
3. After deciding how I'll approach the
question, skim through the answer
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55

Partial preview of the text

Download LSAT Logical Reasoning: Questions and Answers and more Exams Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

LSAT: Logical

Reasoning exam

questions fully

solved & updated

What are the basic steps to approaching a question? - answer 1. Stop to consider what the question is really asking

  1. Decide how I'll approach the question (ex. organizing info in a table)
  2. After deciding how I'll approach the question, skim through the answer

choices and eliminate any that are obviously in the wrong "direction"

  1. Use the approach you picked When is the adversarial approach used? How? - answer When you've narrowed a question down between two equally good choices.
  2. Attack the choice that seems the most likely to be true
  3. Try to defend the answer choice you think is not true
  4. Defend the answer choice I like
  5. Attack the answer choice I do not like

LR: How should I pick questions for LR? - answer First, go page by page picking the easiest questions, then start over again on the first page and pick the second easiest questions. Cold guess on the remaining questions LR: What must all logical arguments include? - answer Facts that are accepted as true by all parties and some new facts derived from the established facts LR: What are the established facts that both parties agree on called? - answer Premises

LR:

Choose the premise(s), assumption, and conclusion. Also, explained whey Geroge's argument is flawed: Geroge: All white cats are deaf, right? You: I guess so George: And Little Binky is white, right? You: Yes Geroge: Then Little Binky must be deaf You: Okay, I agree - answer Premises: Little Binkey is white; All white cats are deaf Conclusion: Little Binkey is deaf Assumption: Little Binkey is a cat

LR: What is an assumption? - answer A premise that is necessary to make an argument work but is not stated. LR: Can premises stated in a question be assumptions? - answer No LR: What is an inference? - answer The process of making a logical argument and arriving at a conclusion. LR: If a question ask: "Which of the following can be inferred?" , what is it asking? - answer What can be concluded based on valid logic through the given premises?

LR: Does an inference have to be the main conclusion of an argument? - answer No, only a conclusion. LR: What are the two ways in which a logical argument may be flawed? - answer 1. It may use valid logic but do so incorrectly

  1. It may use invalid logic LR: What are the two broad categories of logical arguments? - answer Deductive and inductive

people and/or objects in sets (established groups) and states certain characteristics about that set. Ex. All baseball players have red sports cars. LR: If I were to use a circle and arrow diagram to help me with this set deductive argument, what would I circle and what would the arrows point to? : "Any small business is an entrepreneurial venture. All entrepreneurial ventures are risky. John's business is a small business. Therefore, John's business is risky." - answer John's business is the smallest circle; around it is a circle for small businesses; around small businesses is a

circle for entrepreneurial ventures, with an arrow pointing to risky. LR: Both If/then and set deductive arguments deal in absolutes, but what is different? - answer Set questions deal with absolute CHARACTERISTICS. If/then deals with absolute RULES about the universe, Ex. "If it rains, it pours." LR: What is the "determining factor" of an if/then argument? What is the result? - answer The independent variable is known as the deterring factor. The dependent variable is the dependent variable.

Rule: If it rains, then the sidewalk will be wet Test: The sidewalk is wet. What must be true Answer: It has rained - answer No. Something else could have wet the sidewalk (b to a; flipped) LR: Is this valid logic? Rule: If it rains, then the sidewalk will be wet Test: The sidewalk is not wet. What must be true

Answer: It has not rained - answer Yes (- b to -a;flipped and negated=contrapostive) LR: What is a contrapositive? - answer A valid statement of logic that switches the original if/then statement around the flips each side's sign: Ex. If you don't eat, then you will be hungry. (-Eat -> hungry) Contrapositive: If I am hungry, then I have not eaten (Hungry -> -eaten)

that is important. Display the if/then mathematically. -Is it saying that the educated becoming complacent guarantees that the empire will crumble or as long as the educated do not become complacent (absence of the educated becoming complacent) the empire will not crumble? LR: In if/then questions, what does unless imply? - answer The absence of the determining factor predicts the absence of intended result. Ex. You will not get into law school unless you take the LSAT (Unless presence of A, the absence of B). This is not to say the the

presence of the LSAT will get you into law school. LR: What does the expression "only if" indicate? - answer The absence of the determining factor predicts absence of intended result. Ex. You will get into law school only if you take the LSAT (Only if presence A, then absence B). The presence of the LSAT does not garuntee you will get in LR: What is the simplification of this statement? "If, and only if, you get accepted into law school will you start law classes in the fall." - answer If you do

"Anyone who drinks milk regularly does not have a calcium deficiency. John does not have a calcium deficiency. - answer Drinking milk regularly and having a calcium deficiency are triggers. John does not match either of these, so we cannot. LR: How can I determine whether something is necessary or sufficent? - answer - If it is the absence of the determining factor that guarantees a result, then it is necessary but not sufficient. Ex. LSAT is necessary for getting into law school but does not guarantee its acceptance.

  • Something that is sufficient is not only necessary, but gguaranteesthe result in itself. LR: What are the conditions for necessary or sufficient in symbols? - answer Sufficient A→B (presence of A) Necessary -A→-B (absence of A) Both If and only if: -A→-B (absence) and A→B (presence)