Problem Set 2 for Physics 216: Many-Body Theory, Spring 2002, Exercises of Quantum Physics

Problem set 2 for the physics 216: many-body theory course offered in the spring of 2002. The problem set includes four questions covering topics such as green's functions, cooper pair size, superconductivity, and a tight-binding-like model. Students are asked to calculate fourier-transformed green's functions, estimate cooper pair size and rotational velocity, check commutation relations, and solve a tight-binding-model problem.

Typology: Exercises

2010/2011

Uploaded on 11/07/2011

strawberry3
strawberry3 🇺🇸

4.6

(39)

387 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Physics 216: Topics in many-body theory, spring 2002
Problem set 2: assigned 2/20/03, due 3/6/03
1. Green’s function: Define the retarded Green’s function through
iGr
αβ(t1, r1, t2, r2) = hΨα(t1, r1
β(t2, r2)+Ψ
β(t2, r2α(t1, r1)iif t1t2>0
0 if t1t2<0. (1)
Calculate the Fourier-transformed Green’s function Gr(ω, p) for the free Fermi gas at temperature
T(i.e., the expectation value hi is taken with respect to the finite-temperature Fermi gas). Be sure
to specify where any poles occur. Check that contour integration of your result indeed gives zero
for negative t=t1t2.
2. Consider a Cooper pair in He3, which is a p-wave superconductor, so the angular momentum
of the pair is ¯
h. Estimate the order of magnitude of the Cooper pair size as follows: assume that
the gap maximum is of the same order as Tc(of order 103K). Assume that the Cooper pair size,
of order ξ, is related to the gap through
ξ¯
hvF
.(2)
What is the order of magnitude of the rotational velocity of one He atom in a pair? You may wish
to use the fact that the effective mass is m= 3.1m.
Compare the rotational velocity to the Fermi velocity, which you can estimate by recalling that
the effective mass m= 3.1mand knowing that the Fermi momentum is pF=¯
h(0.8×108cm1).
3. When discussing superconductivity, we diagonalized the low-energy excitations near the
Fermi surface in terms of new operators γk. Check the commutation relation of these operators.
Define a time-ordered Green’s function in terms of these operators and calculate it as a function of
(ω, p) for the BCS state.
Reversing the diagonalization, what does this say about the expectation values of pairs of the
original Ψ operators? In particular, can there be a nonzero expectation value in the BCS state of
“anomalous” combinations of operators like Ψ(t1, r1(0,0) that vanish in the normal state?
4. Consider the following tight-binding-like model (one variant of the Hubbard model) on the
square lattice with one orbital per site:
H=tX
hiji
(cc
+h.c.)X
i
Uinini(3)
The first sum is over nearest-neighbor pairs.
Suppose that Uis positive (so that there is an attractive interaction whenever two particles
are on the same site) and weak compared to the hopping t. Also suppose that the system is at
half-filling (one electron per site on average). Start by solving the U= 0 problem. Then calculate
the Vkk0matrix elements induced by Uthat should appear in the pairing Hamiltonian as functions
of t. What do you expect to be the angular momentum of the Cooper pairs? (i.e., s-wave, p-wave,
etc.) Estimate the transition temperature in terms of the original parameters of the model.
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Problem Set 2 for Physics 216: Many-Body Theory, Spring 2002 and more Exercises Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Physics 216: Topics in many-body theory, spring 2002

Problem set 2: assigned 2/20/03, due 3/6/

  1. Green’s function: Define the retarded Green’s function through

iGrαβ (t 1 , r 1 , t 2 , r 2 ) =

{ 〈Ψα(t 1 , r 1 )Ψ† β (t 2 , r 2 ) + Ψ† β (t 2 , r 2 )Ψα(t 1 , r 1 )〉 if t 1 − t 2 > 0 0 if t 1 − t 2 < 0.

Calculate the Fourier-transformed Green’s function Gr(ω, p) for the free Fermi gas at temperature T (i.e., the expectation value 〈〉 is taken with respect to the finite-temperature Fermi gas). Be sure to specify where any poles occur. Check that contour integration of your result indeed gives zero for negative t = t 1 − t 2.

  1. Consider a Cooper pair in He^3 , which is a p-wave superconductor, so the angular momentum of the pair is ¯h. Estimate the order of magnitude of the Cooper pair size as follows: assume that the gap maximum is of the same order as Tc (of order 10−^3 K). Assume that the Cooper pair size, of order ξ, is related to the gap through

ξ ∼

¯hvF ∆

What is the order of magnitude of the rotational velocity of one He atom in a pair? You may wish to use the fact that the effective mass is m∗^ = 3. 1 m.

Compare the rotational velocity to the Fermi velocity, which you can estimate by recalling that the effective mass m∗^ = 3. 1 m and knowing that the Fermi momentum is pF = ¯h(0. 8 × 108 cm−^1 ).

  1. When discussing superconductivity, we diagonalized the low-energy excitations near the Fermi surface in terms of new operators γk↑. Check the commutation relation of these operators. Define a time-ordered Green’s function in terms of these operators and calculate it as a function of (ω, p) for the BCS state.

Reversing the diagonalization, what does this say about the expectation values of pairs of the original Ψ operators? In particular, can there be a nonzero expectation value in the BCS state of “anomalous” combinations of operators like Ψ†(t 1 , r 1 )Ψ†(0, 0) that vanish in the normal state?

  1. Consider the following tight-binding-like model (one variant of the Hubbard model) on the square lattice with one orbital per site:

H = −t

〈ij〉,σ

(ciσc† jσ + h.c.) −

i

Uini↑ni↓ (3)

The first sum is over nearest-neighbor pairs.

Suppose that U is positive (so that there is an attractive interaction whenever two particles are on the same site) and weak compared to the hopping t. Also suppose that the system is at half-filling (one electron per site on average). Start by solving the U = 0 problem. Then calculate the Vkk′ matrix elements induced by U that should appear in the pairing Hamiltonian as functions of t. What do you expect to be the angular momentum of the Cooper pairs? (i.e., s-wave, p-wave, etc.) Estimate the transition temperature in terms of the original parameters of the model.