Marking Sheet and Guide, Exams of Public Health

Marking Criteria for Public Health

Typology: Exams

2022/2023

Uploaded on 10/11/2024

james-dawson
james-dawson 🇺🇸

4 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Marking Criteria
Level 7
In accordance with the FHEQ, at the end of Level 7 students should have a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a
critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic
discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. They will be able to demonstrate originality in the application of
knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create
and interpret knowledge in the discipline. They should have a conceptual understanding that enables them to evaluate critically
current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline and to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them and,
where appropriate, to propose new hypotheses. They will also be able to deal with complex issues both systematically and
creatively, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist
and non-specialist audiences. In addition, they will be able to demonstrate self-direction and originality in tackling and solving
problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level.
Assessment category
Coherent and
detailed knowledge
and understanding
of the subject area,
at least some of
which is informed
by the latest
research and/or
advanced
scholarship within
the discipline
Cognitive and intellectual
skills
Application of theory to
practice (for courses with a
professional practice
element)
Reading a nd
referencing
and structure
Work that significantly
exceeds the specified
penalized
P
ass
mar
k, d
e
mon
strat
ing
a
chi
evement
o
f al
l
ass
oci
at
ed l
ear
ning ou
tcomes
90%-100%
Exemplary
systematic,
theoretical and
conceptual
understanding
of knowledge at
or informed by
the forefront of
the field of
study,
demonstrating
highly
sophisticated
grasp of the
subject matter
Exceptional c ritical
evaluation and
awareness of current
problems, and
contemporary issues
and debates that
draws on new insights
or perspectives within
the field. Work
demonstrates
exemplary ability to
synthesise c urrent
research and
advanced scholarship
in an original, creative
and innovative
manner.
Sophisticated,
systematic and
innovative application
of knowledge and
theory to professional
practice within the
discipline. Fla wless
use of systematically
selected literature to
justify and express
reasoned judgements
and decisions in
relation to complex
issues and problems at
a professional level
A very high level of
critical engagement
across a systematic
and fully
appropriate range
of relevant and
current academic,
research, policy-
and practice-
related literature
demonstrating
deep and selective
reading and
initiative along with
highly consistent
accurate
referencing
Exemplary
presentatio n of
work that is fluent
and flawless
throughout.
80%-89%
Excellent
systematic,
theoretical and
conceptual
understanding
of knowledge at
or informed by
the forefront of
the field of study
and showing
sophisticated
depth, breadth,
detail and clarity
Sophisticated critical
evaluation and
awareness of current
problems, and
contemporary issues
and debates that draws
on new insights or
perspectives within the
field. Work
demonstrates a very
high level of originality
and creativity in the
student’s approaches
to synthesising current
research and
advanced scholarship
within the subject area
An excellent level of
originality and
innovation in the
application of
knowledge and theory
to professional practice
within the discipline.
Demonstration of
excellent critic al
awareness and
evaluation and the
ability to effectively
critique
and employ
current academic
literature in making
reasoned judgements
and decisions in
relation to complex
issues and problems at
a professional level
A very high level of
critical engagement
across an
extensive range of
relevant and
current academic,
research, policy-
and practice-
related literature
demonstrating
deep and
appropriate reading
and initiative along
with highly
consistent accurate
referencing
Outstanding
presentatio n of
work that is
logically and
coherently
structured with a
strong or original
central
argument(s),
conveyed with a
high level of
fluency and
eloquently
communic ates
compelling,
coherent
conclusions to
specialist and
non-specialist
audiences
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Marking Sheet and Guide and more Exams Public Health in PDF only on Docsity!

Marking Criteria

Level 7

In accordance with the FHEQ, at the end of Level 7 students should have a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. They will be able to demonstrate originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline. They should have a conceptual understanding that enables them to evaluate critically current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline and to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them and, where appropriate, to propose new hypotheses. They will also be able to deal with complex issues both systematically and creatively, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist and non-specialist audiences. In addition, they will be able to demonstrate self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level.

Assessment category

Coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of the subject area, at least some of which is informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline

Cognitive and intellectual skills

Application of theory to practice (for courses with a professional practice element)

Reading and referencing

Presentation, style and structure Work that significantly exceeds the specified word limit may be penalized

P

ass

mar

k, d

emon

strat

ing

a

chi

evement

o

f al

l^ ass

oci

at

ed l

ear

ning ou

tcomes

Exemplary systematic, theoretical and conceptual understanding of knowledge at or informed by the forefront of the field of study, demonstrating highly sophisticated grasp of the subject matter

Exceptional critical evaluation and awareness of current problems, and contemporary issues and debates that draws on new insights or perspectives within the field. Work demonstrates exemplary ability to synthesise current research and advanced scholarship in an original, creative and innovative manner.

Sophisticated, systematic and innovative application of knowledge and theory to professional practice within the discipline. Flawless use of systematically selected literature to justify and express reasoned judgements and decisions in relation to complex issues and problems at a professional level

A very high level of critical engagement across a systematic and fully appropriate range of relevant and current academic, research, policy- and practice- related literature demonstrating deep and selective reading and initiative along with highly consistent accurate referencing

Exemplary presentation of work that is fluent and flawless throughout.

Excellent systematic, theoretical and conceptual understanding of knowledge at or informed by the forefront of the field of study and showing sophisticated depth, breadth, detail and clarity

Sophisticated critical evaluation and awareness of current problems, and contemporary issues and debates that draws on new insights or perspectives within the field. Work demonstrates a very high level of originality and creativity in the student’s approaches to synthesising current research and advanced scholarship within the subject area

An excellent level of originality and innovation in the application of knowledge and theory to professional practice within the discipline. Demonstration of excellent critical awareness and evaluation and the ability to effectively critique and employ current academic literature in making reasoned judgements and decisions in relation to complex issues and problems at a professional level

A very high level of critical engagement across an extensive range of relevant and current academic, research, policy- and practice- related literature demonstrating deep and appropriate reading and initiative along with highly consistent accurate referencing

Outstanding presentation of work that is logically and coherently structured with a strong or original central argument(s), conveyed with a high level of fluency and eloquently communicates compelling, coherent conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences

Level 7

Coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding

Cognitive and intellectual skills

Application of theory to practice

Reading and referencing

Presentation, style and structure

Pass

mark,

demonstrating

achievement

of

all

associated

learning

outcomes

A high level of systematic, theoretical and conceptual understanding of knowledge at or informed by the forefront of the field of study and showing considerable depth, breadth, detail and clarity

A high level of critical evaluation and awareness of current problems, and contemporary issues and debates that draws on new insights or perspectives within the field. Work demonstrates a significant level of originality and creativity in synthesising current research and advanced scholarship within the subject area

A high level of originality and innovation in the application of knowledge and theory to professional practice within the discipline. Demonstration of excellent critical awareness and evaluation and the ability to select and use academic literature in making reasoned judgements and decisions in relation to complex issues and problems at a professional level

A high level of critical engagement across an extensive range of relevant and current literature demonstrating wide and appropriate reading and initiative along with highly consistent accurate referencing

Excellent presentation of work that is logically and coherently structured with a strong or original central argument(s), conveyed with a high level of clarity of expression and which clearly communicates valid, coherent conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences

An effective, systematic, theoretical and conceptual understanding of knowledge mostly at or informed by the forefront of the field of study and showing good depth, breadth, detail and clarity

An effective level of critical evaluation and awareness of current problems and contemporary issues and debates that draws on new insights or perspectives within the field. Work demonstrates some effective originality and creativity in synthesising current research and scholarship within the subject area

A good level of originality and innovation in the application of knowledge and theory to professional practice. Demonstration of consistently good critical awareness and evaluation and reasonable ability to use the academic literature in making reasoned judgements and decisions in relation to complex issues and problems at a professional level

A good level of critical engagement across a good range of relevant and current academic, research, policy- and practice- related literature demonstrating appropriate reading and some initiative along with consistent accurate referencing

High quality presentation of work that is largely logically and coherently structured with a generally strong central argument conveyed with a clarity of expression and which communicates clear conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences

A sufficient but limited level of systematic, theoretical and conceptual understanding of knowledge at times at or informed by the forefront of the field of study but showing adequate depth, breadth, detail and clarity

A sufficient but limited level of critical evaluation and awareness of current problems and contemporary issues and debates, with some reference to new insights or perspectives within the field. Limited evidence of originality and creativity in synthesising current research and scholarship within the subject area

A reasonable but limited level of originality and innovation in the application of knowledge and theory to professional practice within the discipline. Demonstration of some good critical awareness and evaluation and some ability to use the academic literature in developing judgements and decisions in relation to complex issues and problems at a professional level

Sufficient critical engagement with a reasonable range of relevant and current academic, research, policy- and practice- related literature demonstrating mainly appropriate reading but limited initiative and/or some minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing

Generally good presentation of work that is sufficiently logical and coherent in structure with a discernible central argument. May present limited originality and lack some clarity of expression, but an identifiable conclusion reasonably communicated to specialist and non-specialist audiences