R. v. McCurrach (2000) Case: Hell's Angels and Charter of Rights Violations, Study notes of Law

The r. V. Mccurrach (2000) case where the hell's angels motorcycle club officially entered alberta, leading to a 'zero tolerance' police check stop. The participating police forces, the violation of charter rights under sections 7, 8, and 9, and the court's findings.

Typology: Study notes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/19/2013

bhaji
bhaji 🇮🇳

3.8

(5)

83 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
R. v. McCurrach (2000)
On June 23, 1997, the Hell's Angels Motorcycle Club officially came to Alberta when two
Hell's Angels chapters were formed through a charter granting ceremony held in Red
Deer, Alberta. On June 24, many of those who had attended the ceremony drove from
Red Deer to Calgary and were stopped by police just inside Calgary's city limits.
The check stop was a co-ordinated effort involving more than 20 police departments
from across Canada as well as the federal Department of Immigration. Participating police
forces included the Edmonton Police, the Halifax Police, the Surete du Quebec, and
RCMP detachments from Red Deer, Nanaimo, and Ottawa. The Calgary Police, in co-
ordination with the Criminal Intelligence Service of Alberta and the RCMP, had developed
a "zero tolerance" policy toward the Hell's Angels.
It was a hot day, but the motorcyclists were not allowed to remove their helmets, and
waiting times varied from one to four hours. Although they had not been arrested, gang
members were videotaped and photographed. Anyone who refused to be photographed
was threatened with criminal charges for obstruction of justice. The police issued tickets
for "causing unnecessary noise from a motor vehicle," "chin strap not done up on helmet,"
"failing to ride single file" on the way to the check area, and "littering." Many motorcyclists
had their helmets confiscated even though they had been approved for use by the
provincial Department of Transportation and bore official stickers testifying to that effect.
The Hell's Angels applied to the Provincial Court of Alberta, alleging breaches of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Crown argued that no Charter breaches
had occurred, but if they had, those breaches were the result of reasonable limits
prescribed by law on the applicants' rights and freedoms. The judge found the police had
violated the gang members' Charter rights under s. 7 (security of the person), s. 8
(unreasonable search and seizure), and s. 9 (arbitrary detention). No breaches of Charter
rights were found under s. 2(d) (freedom of association) or s. 6 (mobility rights).
1. Referring to the ordinated effort in this case, name one police force from each of the
three levels of police forces in Canada.
2. At trial, the Court noted that the Hell's Angels have an "unsavoury reputation." Do you
think the police were justified in adopting the measures they used against such an
organization? Explain.
3. Acting as counsel for the Hell's Angels, outline how you would convince the Court that
the police
violated your clients' rights under ss. 7, 8, and 9 of the Charter.
Docsity.com

Partial preview of the text

Download R. v. McCurrach (2000) Case: Hell's Angels and Charter of Rights Violations and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!

R. v. McCurrach (2000)

On June 23, 1997, the Hell's Angels Motorcycle Club officially came to Alberta when two Hell's Angels chapters were formed through a charter granting ceremony held in Red Deer, Alberta. On June 24, many of those who had attended the ceremony drove from Red Deer to Calgary and were stopped by police just inside Calgary's city limits. The check stop was a co-ordinated effort involving more than 20 police departments from across Canada as well as the federal Department of Immigration. Participating police forces included the Edmonton Police, the Halifax Police, the Surete du Quebec, and RCMP detachments from Red Deer, Nanaimo, and Ottawa. The Calgary Police, in co- ordination with the Criminal Intelligence Service of Alberta and the RCMP, had developed a "zero tolerance" policy toward the Hell's Angels. It was a hot day, but the motorcyclists were not allowed to remove their helmets, and waiting times varied from one to four hours. Although they had not been arrested, gang members were videotaped and photographed. Anyone who refused to be photographed was threatened with criminal charges for obstruction of justice. The police issued tickets for "causing unnecessary noise from a motor vehicle," "chin strap not done up on helmet," "failing to ride single file" on the way to the check area, and "littering." Many motorcyclists had their helmets confiscated even though they had been approved for use by the provincial Department of Transportation and bore official stickers testifying to that effect. The Hell's Angels applied to the Provincial Court of Alberta, alleging breaches of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Crown argued that no Charter breaches had occurred, but if they had, those breaches were the result of reasonable limits prescribed by law on the applicants' rights and freedoms. The judge found the police had violated the gang members' Charter rights under s. 7 (security of the person), s. 8 (unreasonable search and seizure), and s. 9 (arbitrary detention). No breaches of Charter rights were found under s. 2(d) (freedom of association) or s. 6 (mobility rights).

  1. Referring to the ordinated effort in this case, name one police force from each of the

three levels of police forces in Canada.

  1. At trial, the Court noted that the Hell's Angels have an "unsavoury reputation." Do you

think the police were justified in adopting the measures they used against such an organization? Explain.

  1. Acting as counsel for the Hell's Angels, outline how you would convince the Court that the police violated your clients' rights under ss. 7, 8, and 9 of the Charter.

Docsity.com