






















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Insights into enterprise architecture (ea) and its strategic role in organizational transformation. It covers key trends, challenges, and opportunities in ea, including the integration of artificial intelligence (ai). The document emphasizes the importance of aligning business, it, data, and security insights to drive effective decision-making and sustainable business transformation programs. It also explores the role of enterprise architects in maximizing security, ensuring data quality, and building digital and ai strategies. Case studies, maturity models, and practical approaches to empower the growth of ea practices and deliver undeniable value to the business. It also touches on the use of ai to augment ea practices, such as smart assistants and auto-classification.
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 30
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!























Architecting Change
Marketing SEO improvements Content creation Copywriting Communication Design Translations Video editing Software development Code Development Debugging Documentation Human resources Job interview guides Job descriptions Data analysis Categorization Pattern analysis Auto recommendations Customer service Chatbots Personalized responses Learning Course content Adaptive courses Legal Contract templates Legal research Policies initialization
The race to artificial intelligence
The race to artificial intelligence
Source: McKinsey Global Survey on AI - April 2023
Inaccuracy 56% 53% 46% Cybersecurity Intellectual property infringement
HOPEX Aquila Driving transformation with a 360° view of your organization
Market Analysis: Trends in Enterprise Architecture Unveiled
© I N F O - T E C H R E S E A R C H G R O U P
© I N F O - T E C H R E S E A R C H G R O U P
Have job descriptions been created for each role in the Architecture space? Have the skills needed for the roles in different architecture domains been identified? Has the head of Architecture been appointed? What is the staffing level of Architecture? 13
Yes, and reports to the Head of IT Yes, and reports to the CEO/COO No Don’t know
Skills documented Skills documented and gap analyzed Skills undocumented Don’t know
Skills documented, gap analyzed, and plan made to close the gap
Capacity to get the job done Capacity required to sustainably cope with Architecture workload Not enough people to do basic activities Don’t know
Yes Partly No Don’t know
Does you own an Architecture tool to model and create deliverables? 0% 8% 0% 0% 33% 58% Only the head architect The Architecture department Archt. and IT stakeholders Archt., IT, and business stakeholders It's unused or non-existent Don't know 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Who uses the tool? Is the architecture repository kept up to date (ADRs and other architectural artifacts)? Has an artifact repository been selected, acquired, and implemented? 14
%
% Yes Yes, and it is constantly used No (^) Don’t know
%
% Yes Yes, and it is constantly used No (^) Don’t know 8% Yes 25% No 67% Don’t know
Structure, roles, and responsibilities of the AI governance organization
How AI governance operates and works with other organizational structures to deliver value
Organization – Roles and Responsibilities Monitoring Operating Model Risk & Compliance Tools & Technologies Policies/ Procedures/ Standards Model Governance
Policies and procedures to support implementation of AI governance
Alignment with corporate risk management and ensuring compliance with regulations and assessment frameworks
Ensures accountability and traceability for AI/ML models
Monitoring compliance and risk of AI/ML systems/models in production
Tools and technologies to support AI governance framework implementation
Zero Trust Architecture Case Study Government INDUSTRY Zero Trust Architecture Technical Exchange Meeting SOURCE
NASA recognized the potential benefits of both adopting a zero trust architecture (including aligning with OMB FISMA and DHS CDM DEFEND) and improving NASA systems, especially those related to user experience with dynamic access, application security with sole access from proxy, and risk-based asset management with trust score. The trust score is continually evaluated from a combination of static factors, such as credential and biometrics, and dynamic factors, such as location and behavior analytics, to determine the level of access. The enhanced access mechanism is projected on use-case flows of users and external partners to analyze the required initiatives. The lessons learned in adapting zero trust were:
The challenges of cyber resilience Conceive compliant by design solutions
Get a reliable assessment of cyber risk Avoid liability and penalties Protect the organization
Map IT systems and dependencies Identify IT risks and implement mitigation controls Identify IT service third- party providers
Identify critical IT assets Assess business impacts of IT incidents
Manage cyber risks Detect and report incidents Manage risks
Ensure compliance with various regulations Ensure business continuity Report Incidents to authorities Identify critical processes
The need for a connected approach Conceive compliant by design solutions
Map IT systems and dependencies Identify IT risks and implement mitigation controls Identify IT service third- party providers
Identify critical IT assets Get a reliable assessment of cyber risk Avoid liability and penalties Protect the
Assess business impacts of IT incidents
Manage cyber risks Detect and report incidents
Ensure compliance with various regulations Ensure business continuity Report Incidents to authorities Identify critical processes