


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This is lab report for Advanced Physics Course. It was submitted to Prof. Dhirendra Kapoor at Alliance University. Its main points are: Sources, Beam, Detector, Mirror, interferometer, Splitter, Essential, Sinusoidal, Monochromatic, Essential
Typology: Exercises
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



In essence, the Michelson interferometer consists of a beam splitter which divides a beam of light into two parts of equal intensity, one transmitted, the other reflected. These two Beams strike mirrors at practically normal incidence and return to the beam-splitter where they recombine. The basic arrangement is shown in Figure. Light from a source S is incident on a beam splitter. Half of the beam goes to the mirror M 1 and half goes to the mirror M 2. The beams in the Figure 1 recombine and fringes may be seen at detector position.
Figure 1 : Schematic illustration of a Michelson interferometer
A detailed calculation of the nature of the fringes is somewhat complicated, but the essential features can be deduced from fairly elementary considerations. We first note that for fringes to be formed it is essential that the two beams be derived from the same source. This can be understood by noting that monochromatic light can be regarded as a series of sinusoidal wave-trains which are interrupted at frequent but random intervals as shown in Figure 2. During each interruption, the sine wave undergoes an abrupt phase change. The average length of the wave-train between these interruptions (e.g. the distance l in Figure 2) is called the "coherence length" of the light, and is of order one meter for ordinary light sources. By a simple extension of this concept, the "coherence time" is defined as the coherence length divided by the speed of light in the medium. It follows that the coherence time is usually in the range 10-9^ to 10-8^ sec. If light from two
similar sources is combined, the fringe pattern (positions of maximum and minimum intensity) will undergo random jumps every 10-9^ sec or so, and fringes will not be observed. However, when the two beams are derived from the same source, both beams undergo these random phase changes but do so simultaneously so that the phase relation between them is unaffected. In this case, the interference fringes will remain stationary and can, therefore, be observed. On the other hand, it should be noted that if the difference between the optical path lengths of the two beams is larger than the coherence length, fringes will not be observed, even though the beams are derived from the same source. .
Figure 2: Coherence length of an optical wave.
We see that the centre of the fringe pattern has a maximum intensity if d = nλ/ and a minimum intensity if d = (n + 1/2) λ/2. In general, of course, d satisfies neither of these conditions and the centre of the fringe pattern corresponds to neither a maximum nor a minimum
In the above experiment following sources of error are observed:
Beam splitter used is not very efficient as it is observed the two component of light have some intensity difference. Alignment of the apparatus is also a source of error as if the reflected and transmitted components are not falling on a same point pattern will not be as much symmetric and clear. The input parameters affecting the interference pattern are uncertainties in l and the refractive index of air (na). As index of air (na) is function of the air temperature t, the pressure p, the relative humidity H. However, the errors in measurements could be decreased by improving the environmental conditions. The inefficient way of counting the no of fringes moving with a small change in distance.