Midterm Exam 1 Solutions - Random Processes | ECE 534, Exams of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Material Type: Exam; Class: Random Processes; Subject: Electrical and Computer Engr; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Fall 2006;

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/16/2009

koofers-user-fxz
koofers-user-fxz 🇺🇸

5

(1)

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ECE 534: RANDOM PROCESSES
Fall 2006
Midterm 1 Solutions
Monday, October 16, 2006
1(Note that each part of this problem can be solved indepen-
dently by using what has been shown in the previous part.)
Let (Ω,F, P ) be a probability space. Define:
An F, n = 1,2, . . .
Bm=[
nm
An, m = 1,2, . . . (1)
a) EXTRA CREDIT (although this doesn’t take much effort to
show:) Show that
A,{ω s.t. ω Anfinitely often }(2)
can be expressed as
A=
[
m=1 \
nm
Ac
n
Solution:
if the Anoccur finitely many times then for some mthey occur never again
after m. This is equivalent to saying that A=TnmAc
nfor some m. Thus
A=
[
m=1 \
nm
Ac
n
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Midterm Exam 1 Solutions - Random Processes | ECE 534 and more Exams Electrical and Electronics Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

ECE 534: RANDOM PROCESSES

Fall 2006

Midterm 1 Solutions

Monday, October 16, 2006

1 (Note that each part of this problem can be solved indepen- dently by using what has been shown in the previous part.) Let (Ω, F, P ) be a probability space. Define:

An ∈ F, n = 1, 2 ,... Bm =

n≥m

An, m = 1, 2 ,... (1)

a) EXTRA CREDIT (although this doesn’t take much effort to show:) Show that

A , {ω s.t. ω ∈ An finitely often } (2)

can be expressed as

A =

⋃^ ∞

m=

n≥m

Acn

Solution: if the An occur finitely many times then for some m they occur never again after m. This is equivalent to saying that A =

n≥m A

c n for some^ m. Thus

A =

⋃^ ∞

m=

n≥m

Acn

b) Show that if P (Bm) → 0 then P (A) = 1. Hint: use the result of part a).

Solution: Note that P (Bm) → 0 if and only if P (Bmc) → 1.

Bmc =

n≥m

Acn ⊆

⋃^ ∞

m=

n≥m

Acn = A

⇒ P (A) ≥ P (Bcm) ⇒ P (A) ≥ lim m→∞ P (Bmc) = 1.

c) Let S be a random variable along with the sequence S 1 , S 2 ,... of random variables, all defined on (Ω, F, P ). Define An() = {ω : |Sn(ω) − S(ω)| > } and Bm() along with A() in terms of An() according to (1) and (2). Show that if (^) ∞ ∑

n=

P (An()) < ∞ for all  > 0

then Sn →a.s. S Hint: use the result of part b).

identically to X. Prove the strong law of large numbers. Hint: use the result of part c). Solution: Let Sn = (^) n^1

∑n i=1 Xi^ and^ S^ =^ μ.

P (An()) = P (|Sn − μ| > ) = P (Sn − μ > ) + P (Sn − μ < −) = P (Sn > μ + ) + P (−Sn > −μ + ) ≤ exp(−nl(μ + )) + exp(−nl(μ − ))

where the final inequality follows from the Chernoff bound and noting that E

[

eθ(−X)

]

= M (−θ). For any  > 0, since l(μ + ) and l(μ − ) are both positive, it follows that the geometric sum

n=1 P^ (An()) is finite.^ Thus from (c) we have that Sn →a.s. μ.

2 Let X and Y be independent random variables where:

X ∼ N (0, σ^2 ), Y =

− 1 w/ prob. (^12) 1 w/ prob. (^12)

Let Z = X + Y and W = XY. a) Find the MMSE estimator of Z given Y. Solution: The MMSE estimator is given by E[Z|Y ] = E[X + Y |Y ], which because X and Y are independent, is equal to E[0 + Y |Y ] = Y. b) Find the linear MMSE estimator of Z given Y. Solution: Since the solution in a) is already linear in Y , the answer is the same as a): Eˆ[Z|Y ] = Y. c) Are X and W uncorrelated? Are X and W independent?

Solution: To determine whether or not they are correlated, we must evaluate Cov (X, W ):

Cov (X, W ) = E [(X − EX)(W − EW )] = E [X(W − EW )]

= E

[

X

W −

))]

= E [XW ] = E

[

X^2 Y

]

E

[

X^2

]

E

[

X^2

]

So yes, they are uncorrelated. As for independence, no they are not indepen- dent. This can be shown in numerous ways. One way is: conditioned upon X, W can only take on two possible values. However, W has a marginal distribu- tion that permits it to take on any range of values with non-zero probability.

d) Are X and W Gaussian? Are they jointly Gaussian?

Solution: We are already given that X is Gaussian. As for W ,

fW (w) =

fX (w) +

fX (−w) = fX (w)

where the last equality follows from the symmetry of the Gaussian distribu- tion around 0. Thus W is Gaussian. They are not jointly Gaussian because we know that for jointly Gaussian random variables, uncorrelatedness implies independence. But in c) we showed that they are uncorrelated but not inde- pendent.