Electron Diffraction: Revealing Matter's Wave Nature with Wavelength & Bragg's Rule, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Physics

The historic electron diffraction experiment conducted by Davisson and Germer in 1927, which provided the first experimental evidence of the wave nature of matter. The experiment involved reflecting electrons off a nickel crystal and determining their wavelength using both the de Broglie relationship and Bragg's expression. The document also explains the theory behind the experiment, the apparatus used, and the experimental procedure. taken from various physics textbooks.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

margoth
margoth 🇬🇧

4.4

(11)

229 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
MODERN PHYSICS EXPERIMENT
ELECTRON DIFFRACTION
Reference
Tipler, 3rd Edition, Section 35-6.
F.J. Blatt, Modern Physics, Chapter Six.
Introduction
In 1924 the French physicist Louis de Broglie suggested that, whenever there are particles of
momentum p, their motion is associated with a wave of wavelength λ, given by the following
expression:
λ=h
p(1)
where h is Planck's constant.
The first experimental evidence of the existence of matter waves was found by C. Davisson
and L.H. Germer at the Bell Telephone Laboratories in 1927.
They 'reflected' slow electrons from a single crystal of nickel and applied the de Broglie's
relationship λ = h/p, and so determined the wavelength.
At the same time the wavelength of the electrons was determined from the Bragg's
expression. Excellent agreement was found.
In this experiment it is possible to make interference (a wave property) in the electron beam
visible. Quantitative evaluation of the diffraction pattern (caused by interference) yields
experimental confirmation of the de Broglie relationship, demonstrating the wave nature of
matter (electrons in this case).
Apparatus
1. Electron diffraction tube.
2. Power supply 0-5 kV.
3. 6 V A.C. transformer.
4. Ammeter 0-0.5 A.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Electron Diffraction: Revealing Matter's Wave Nature with Wavelength & Bragg's Rule and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

MODERN PHYSICS EXPERIMENT

ELECTRON DIFFRACTION

Reference

Tipler, 3rd Edition, Section 35-6. F.J. Blatt, Modern Physics, Chapter Six.

Introduction

In 1924 the French physicist Louis de Broglie suggested that, whenever there are particles of momentum p , their motion is associated with a wave of wavelength λ, given by the following expression:

λ =

h p

where h is Planck's constant.

The first experimental evidence of the existence of matter waves was found by C. Davisson and L.H. Germer at the Bell Telephone Laboratories in 1927.

They 'reflected' slow electrons from a single crystal of nickel and applied the de Broglie's relationship λ = h/p , and so determined the wavelength.

At the same time the wavelength of the electrons was determined from the Bragg's expression. Excellent agreement was found.

In this experiment it is possible to make interference (a wave property) in the electron beam visible. Quantitative evaluation of the diffraction pattern (caused by interference) yields experimental confirmation of the de Broglie relationship, demonstrating the wave nature of matter (electrons in this case).

Apparatus

  1. Electron diffraction tube.
  2. Power supply 0-5 kV.
  3. 6 V A.C. transformer.
  4. Ammeter 0-0.5 A.

Description of the Diffraction Tube

The operating elements of the tube:- an indirectly heated cathode, the anode and a graphite foil (used as diffraction element) are housed in an evacuated glass bulb.

Fig.

As shown in Fig. 1 the system of electrodes consists of 4 metal cylinders arranged one after the other. The electrodes are connected in pairs, cathode potential K1, K2 and anode high potential A1, A2. A1, K2, A2 act as an (electrostatically) focussing lens. The indirectly heated cathode acts as an electron source.

Anode A2 is a thin polycrystalline graphite foil used as a diffraction element. The focussed electron beam strikes the graphite foil at an angle of 90°.

Some electrons after passing the graphite foil are diffracted and reach the fluorescent layers and give luminous (green) rings.

The intense luminous spot produced in the middle of the screen is due to the direct (non- diffracted) electron beam. It is sometimes useful to cover this spot, since it is very bright, to make the diffracted rings more readily visible.

Theory

The electrons 'reflected' from lattice atoms will produce interference patterns according to Bragg's rule.

2 d sinθ = n λ (2)

where n = order of reflection d = interplanar spacing of the three dimensional lattice θ = reflecting angle λ = wavelength of the electrons.

substituting from equation 2 -

nλ d

R

L

λ = d L

R for the case n = 1

If d , L and R are known, λ can be calculated. The value of L is fixed for a particular apparatus. R can be measure. If d is known, λ can be calculated, or if λ is known, d can be calculated.

In this experiment, the value of d for graphite is given and you are expected to calculate λ.

This value of λ can be verified with the help of de Broglie's equation

λ =

h p

h mv

The kinetic energy of the electrons will be

1 2

mv^2 = eV ,

where V is the numerical value of the accelerating voltage in Volts and e is the charge of the electron in coulombs.

λ = h 2 e mV

V

x 10−^10 m

Experimental Procedure

WARNING! Be careful in connecting the high voltage wire to the diffraction tube apparatus. If for any reason the diffraction tube is to be removed, call your instructor. The tube is evacuated to a pressure of 10-8^ mm Hg and should be handled with caution to avoid implosion.

  1. Connect the circuit as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

  1. Slowly increase the high voltage. At selected intervals (2 kV to 4 kV in 400 V steps) measure the radii of all observed circular rings (mostly there will be only two distinct rings). Obtain an average of four measurements of the radius of each ring by measuring across four different diameters. Record all these measurements, including the values of the high voltage.
  2. Apply Bragg's relationship and calculate the wavelength λ of the electrons at each voltage selected. For the same selected voltage compute from de Broglie's equation the wavelength.
  3. Discuss your results.

Given: d 1 = 2.13 x 10−^10 m

d 2 = 1.23 x 10−^10 m

Distance between Graphite Foil and Fluorescent Screen = 12.8 cm.

No. Accelerating Ring One (diameters) Ring Two (diameters) of Voltage D1 D2 D3 D4 mean D D1 D2 D3 D4 mean D Obs .

(V) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm)

1 2000

2 2400

3 2800

  1. Would the above equation be valid for 10 MeV electrons? If not, why not? Derive an equation which would apply.
  2. Assume that the electron beam is replaced with a beam of positively charged particles. Could you do the same experiment? What would be the result if the particles were protons?
  3. Plot a graph λ^2 vs 1/ V where λ is in angstroms and V in Volts. Use the data obtained from de Broglie's relationship. What is the significance of the slope?
  4. Why does the diffraction pattern consist of circles? Explain why only two concentric circles are formed.Would a single crystal produce the same pattern? Explain.

Modified May 4th, 1998. Modified June 30th 2000.