Module 5 Defective Contracts, Exams of Law

The different types of defective contracts, including rescissible, voidable or annullable, unenforceable, and void and non-existent contracts. It also covers the characteristics of rescissible and voidable contracts, as well as the grounds for annulment. examples and definitions for each type of contract and explains who may demand rescission or annulment. It also discusses the requisites for an accion pauliana and the different kinds of rescissible contracts.

Typology: Exams

2022/2023

Available from 03/13/2023

examiner123
examiner123 🇺🇸

3.6

(5)

503 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MODULE 5
DEFECTIVE CONTRACTS
1. RESCISSIBLE – contract that has caused a particular damage to one of the parties or to a third person and which for
EQUITABLE REASONS may be set aside even if valid
2. VOIDABLE OR ANNULLABLE (contrato nulo) – contract in which CONSENT of one of the parties is defective, either because
of WANT OF CAPACITY or because it is VITIATED , but which contract is VALID until JUDICIALLY set aside
3.
UNENFORCEABLE – contract that for some reason CANNOT BE ENFORCED, UNLESS RATIFIED in the manner
PROVIDED BY LAΩ
4.
VOID AND NON-EXISTENT (contrato inexistente) – contract which is an ABSOLUTE NULLITY and produces NO EFFECT,
as if it had never been executed or entered into.
Chapter VI. Rescissible Contracts
Kinds Of Rescissible COntracts
Art 1381 The following are rescissible contracts:
1. Entered into by guardians whenever the wards suffer lesion by more than ¼ of value of things object
Guard
i
an: author
i
zed on
l
y to “manage" ward
´
s property, no power to d
i
spose w
i
thout pr
i
or approva
l
of court. Only
includes those which are “ordinary course" of management of estate of the ward, because if sale, mortgage and other
encumbrance AND not approved by court, it becomes unenforceable.
2. Agreed upon in representation of absentee, suffer lesion by more than ¼ of the value of things object
Same principle in relation to contracts by guardians
3.
In fraud Of creditors who cannot collect claims due them
Requisites Of Accion Pauliana
1. Plaintiff asking for rescission (subsidiary action) has a credit prior to the alienation
2. Debtor has made subsequent contract, giving advantage to a 3rd person
3. Cred
i
t
o
r has n
o
O
t h e r re m e d y but t
o
resc
i
nd the debt
o
r
s c
o
ntract t
o
the 3
rd
pers
o
n (
l
ast res
o
rt)
4. Act being impugned is fraudulent
5. 3rd person who received the property is an accomplice in the fraud
Credit must be existing at the time Of the fraudulent alienation, although not yet due. But at the time Of
accion pauliana, the credit must already be due because it presupposes a judgment and unsatisfied
execution which cannot exist when the debt is not yet demandable at the time the rescissory action is
brought.
GENERAL RULE: Credit is prior to the alienation
EXCEPTION: Credit is after alienation but entitled to accion pauliana because of some prior right
1. Claims were acknowledged by the debtor after alienation, but origin of which antedated the
alienation
2. Those who become subrogated, after the alienation, in the rights of a creditor whose credits were
prior to the alienation
Even secured creditors are entitled to AP
Conveyance was intentionally fraudulent which may be established by the presumption in Art 138
TEST OF FRAUD: Whether the conveyance was a bona fide transaction or a trick and contrivance to defeat creditors or
whether it conserves to the debtor a special right; founded on good consideration or is made with bona fide intent.
Does it prejudice the right of creditors??
Good consideration: creditor is not prejudiced becomes the property was merely replaced or substituted
Badges of fraud applicable
4. Things under litigation, without knowledge and approval of litigant or of competent judicial authority
To secure the possible effectivity of a claim
Transferee of property in good faith who acquires property for valuable consideration, without knowledge of the
litigation or claim of the plaintiff, cannot be deprived of property.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download Module 5 Defective Contracts and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!

MODULE 5

DEFECTIVE CONTRACTS

  1. RESCISSIBLE – contract that has caused a particular damage to one of the parties or to a third person and which for EQUITABLE REASONS may be set aside even if valid
  2. VOIDABLE OR ANNULLABLE (contrato nulo) – contract in which CONSENT of one of the parties is defective, either because of WANT OF CAPACITY or because it is VITIATED , but which contract is VALID until JUDICIALLY set aside
  3. UNENFORCEABLE – contract that for some reason CANNOT BE ENFORCED, UNLESS RATIFIED in the manner PROVIDED BY LAΩ
  4. VOID AND NON-EXISTENT (contrato inexistente) – contract which is an ABSOLUTE NULLITY and produces NO EFFECT, as if it had never been executed or entered into.

Chapter VI. Rescissible Contracts

Kinds Of Rescissible COntracts Art 1381 The following are rescissible contracts:

  1. Entered into by guardians whenever the wards suffer lesion by more than ¼ of value of things object
    • Guardian: authorized only to “manage" ward´s property, no power to dispose without prior approval of court. Only includes those which are “ordinary course" of management of estate of the ward, because if sale, mortgage and other encumbrance AND not approved by court, it becomes unenforceable.
  2. Agreed upon in representation of absentee, suffer lesion by more than ¼ of the value of things object
    • Same principle in relation to contracts by guardians
  3. In fraud Of creditors who cannot collect claims due them
    • Requisites Of Accion Pauliana
      1. Plaintiff asking for rescission (subsidiary action) has a credit prior to the alienation
      2. Debtor has made subsequent contract, giving advantage to a 3rd^ person
      3. Creditor has no Other remedy but to rescind the debtor’s contract to the 3 rd^ person (last resort)
      4. Act being impugned is fraudulent
      5. 3 rd^ person who received the property is an accomplice in the fraud
    • Credit must be existing at the time Of the fraudulent alienation, although not yet due. But at the time Of accion pauliana, the credit must already be due because it presupposes a judgment and unsatisfied execution which cannot exist when the debt is not yet demandable at the time the rescissory action is brought.
    • GENERAL RULE: Credit is prior to the alienation
    • EXCEPTION: Credit is after alienation but entitled to accion pauliana because of some prior right
      1. Claims were acknowledged by the debtor after alienation, but origin of which antedated the alienation
      2. Those who become subrogated, after the alienation, in the rights of a creditor whose credits were prior to the alienation
    • Even secured creditors are entitled to AP
    • Conveyance was intentionally fraudulent which may be established by the presumption in Art 138⁄
    • TEST OF FRAUD: Whether the conveyance was a bona fide transaction or a trick and contrivance to defeat creditors or whether it conserves to the debtor a special right; founded on good consideration or is made with bona fide intent. □ Does it prejudice the right of creditors??
    • Good consideration: creditor is not prejudiced becomes the property was merely replaced or substituted
    • Badges of fraud applicable
  4. Things under litigation, without knowledge and approval of litigant or of competent judicial authority
    • To secure the possible effectivity of a claim
    • Transferee of property in good faith who acquires property for valuable consideration, without knowledge of the litigation or claim of the plaintiff, cannot be deprived of property.
  1. Specially declared by law to be subject of rescission Characteristics of Rescissible Contracts
  2. Their defect consist in injury Or damage either to one of the contracting parties or to third persons LESION: injury which one of the parties suffers by virtue of contract that is disadvantageous to him; must be known or could have been known at the birth of contract and not due to subsequent thereto or unknown to the parties E.g. Art 1098 Partition, judicial and extra-judicial may be rescinded on account of lesion Art 1539 Sale of real estate of inferior thing Art 1542 Sale of real estate made for a lump sum
  3. They are valid before rescission
  4. They can be attacked directly Only, not collaterally
  5. They can be attacked Only either by a contracting party, Or by a third person who is injured Or defrauded
  6. They can be convalidated Only by prescription and not by ratification. RESCISSION Art 1380 Contracts validly agreed upon may be rescinded in the cases established by law. Definition Remedy granted by law to the contracting parties and even to third persons, to secure the reparation of damages caused to them by a contract, even if this should be valid, by means of the restoration of things to their condition at the moment prior to the celebration of said contract. □ Relief for the protection of one of the contracting parties AND third persons from all injury and damages the contract may cause OR protect some incompatible and preferent right created by the contract □ Implies a contract which, even if initially valid, produces a lesion or pecuniary damage to someone □ Set asides the act or contract for justifiable reasons of equity □ Grounds for rescission can only be for legal cause □ Voidable contracts may also be rescinded □ Sir Labitag: Rescissible contracts are in between valid and void Rescission Art 1380 Distinguished from Resolution Art 1191 Art 1191 Resolution Art 1380 Rescission Similarities 1. Presuppose contracts validly entered into and existing □ Rescission v. Annulment: the latter there is a defect which vitiates/invalidates the contract
  7. Mutual restitution when declared proper Who may demand Only by a party to the contract Party to the contract suffering lesion Third parties prejudiced by the contract Grounds Non-performance (implied tacit condition in reciprocal obligation) Various reasons of equity provided by the grounds, mainly economic injury or lesions Scope of judicial control Court determines sufficiency of reason to justify extension of time to perform obligation (whether slight or casual breach) Sufficiency of reason does not affect right to ask for rescission (cannot be refused if all the requisites are satisfied) Kind of obli applicable to Only to reciprocal Unilateral, reciprocal Even when contract is fully fulfilled Character Principal Remedy Secondary/Subsidiary Case:
  • Universal Food Corporation v CA MUTUAL DISSENT not the same with rescission, because mutual dissent is tantamount to a simple creation

▪ Bad faith – rescissible because of his complicity in the fraud; if not possible to return, indemnify the plaintiff Who may bring action for rescission

  1. Creditor injured
  2. Heirs of creditor injured
  3. Creditors of creditor injured (by virtue of accion subrogatoria) Extent of Rescission Art 1384 Rescission shall be only to the extent necessary to cover the damages caused.
  • As to the excess, alienation is maintained even if transferee is in bad faith
  • Benefits only the plaintiff creditor, not everyone
  • BUT if transferee is willing to pay, no rescission Presumptions of Fraud Art 138⁄ All contracts by virtue of which the debtor alienates property by gratuitous title are presumed to have been entered into in fraud of creditors, when the donor did not reserve sufficient property to pay all debts contracted before the donation. Alienations by onerous title are also presumed fraudulent when made by persons against whom some judgment has been issued. The decision or attachment need not refer to the property alienated, and need not have been obtained by the party seeking the rescission. In addition to these presumptions, the design to defraud creditors may be proved in any other manner recognized by the law of evidence. □ Rebuttal by evidence that conveyance was made: o In good faith o For a sufficient cause □ Effect of Fraud: Does not necessarily make the alienation rescissible. It is only one of the requisites for accion pauliana. Can be overruled by a transferee in good faith and for valuable consideration Badges of Fraud (indicia of fraud) – rules by which fraudulent character of transaction may be determined
  1. Fictitious/insufficient consideration
  2. Conveyance is after suit is filed and while it is pending
  3. Sale on credit by insolvent debtor
  4. Evidence of insolvency or large indebtedness
  5. Transfer of All or nearly all of debtor´s property
  6. Transfer is between father and son when some of above is present ⁄. Failure of vendee to take exclusive possession of the property Cases:
  • Oria v McMicking
  • Siguan v Lim
  • Suntay v CA supra Liability for acquiring in bad faith the things alienated in fraud of creditors Art 1388 Whoever acquires in bad faith the things alienated in fraud of creditors, shall indemnify the latter for damages suffered by them on account of the alienation, whenever, due to any cause, it should be impossible for him to return them. If there are two or more alienations, the first acquirer shall be liable first, and so on successively.

Chapter VII. Voidable or Annullable Contracts

Kinds of Voidable/Annullable Contracts Art 1390 Although no damage to contracting parties:

  1. Want of capacity
  2. Vitiated consent Characteristics of Voidable/Annullable Contracts
  3. Their defect consists in the vitiation of consent of one of the contracting parties
  4. They are binding until they are annulled by a competent court
  5. They are susceptible of convalidation by ratification or by prescription ANNULMENT Annulment distinguished from Rescission NULLITY (Voidable) RESCISSION (Rescissible) Declares inefficiency which contract already carries in itself (intrinsic defect) Merely produces inefficiency, which did not exist essentially in the contract (external defect i.e. pecuniary damages or prejudice to one of the contracting parties or 3rd^ persons) Requires act of ratification to be cured Needs no ratification to be effective Based on a vice of the contract which invalidates it Compatible with the perfect validity of the contract Annulment is a sanction based on law Rescission is a remedy based on equity Demanded only by the parties to the contract Demanded even by third parties affected by it Public interest predominates Private interest predominates Grounds for Annulment Art 1390
  6. Incapacity to consent

price/thing received □ Benefit not necessarily a material and permanent increase in fortune □ Proof of benefit incumbent upon the defendant, in the absence of such proof, the presumption is there is no benefit/profit to the incapacitated person □ If still in the patrimony at the time incapacity ceases, deemed to have been benefited. If he asks for annulment, he must return it to the other party. If he squanders, it is ratification.

  1. When the thing is lost through the fault of the party obliged to return the same (i.e. defendant) Art 1400 return the fruits received AND the value of thing at the time of loss, with interest from same date LOSS THROUGH FORTUITOUS EVENT: pay the value of the thing lost but not fruits and interests Cases:
    • Cadwallader & Co v Smith, Bell & Co
    • Velarde v CA supra Extinguishment of the Action a. Art 1392 By ratificatiOn Confirmation/ratification: cures a defect of nullity Acknowledgment: remedies deficiency of proof b. Art 1401 When the thing is lost through the fault Of the person who has the right to file the action □ LOSS NOT THROUGH THE FAULT, e.g. fortuitous event: not extinguished because extinguishment limited only to the loss by fault of plaintiff. Unjust enrichment if the loss is returned for the defendant to bear. Hence, the defendant cannot be obliged to make restitution to the plaintiff because of Art 1402 (cannot compelled to return if the other party does not return) □ Cannot extinguish action for annulment by any event not imputable to the fault or fraud of the plaintiff RATIFICATION Requisites of Ratification a. Contract is voidable/annullable (i.e. consent of one party is defective) b. Ratification is made with the knowledge of the cause for nullity c. At the time of the ratification, the cause of nullity has already ceased to exist Forms of Ratification a. Art 1393 Express or tacit: execute an act which necessarily implies an intention to waive his rights E.g. of EXPRESS: any oral or written manifestation of the person entitled to ask for annulment that he agrees to be bound by the contract or that he will not seek its annulment E.g. of IMPLIED: □ silence or acquiescence □ acts showing approval or adoption of the contract □ acceptance and retention of benefits flowing therefrom b. Art 1394 By the parties themselves or by the guardian in behalf of an incapacitated party
  • During the existence of incapacity
  • Right to ratify is transmitted to the heirs of the party entitled to such right. Effects of Ratification a. Art 1392 Action to annul is extinguished b. Art 1396 The contract is cleansed retroactively from all its defects from the time it was constituted EXCEPTION: Right of 3rd^ persons prior to ratification

Case:

  • Uy Soo Lim v Tan Unchuan

Chapter VIII. Unenforceable Contracts

Characteristics of Unenforceable Contracts

  1. They cannot be enforced by a proper action in court
  2. They are susceptible Of ratification
  3. They cannot be assailed by third persons Art 1408 Unenforceable distinguished from Rescissible and Annullable UNENFORCEAB LE RESCISSIBLE AND ANNULLABLE Produces NO legal effect unless ratified by competent court Produce legal effects unless set aside by competent court Kinds of Unenforceable Contracts
  4. Entered into in the name of another person by one who has no authority or no legal representation OR acted beyond his powers
  5. Do not comply with Statute of Frauds, which are agreements unenforceable unless in written memorandum and subscribed by the party charged a. Not to be performed within 1 year from the making □ If no time is fixed and nothing to show that it cannot be performed within a year, then not within SoF; Partial performance also takes it out of SOF b. Special promise to answer for the debt, default or miscarriage of another□ Default Or Miscarriage include liability for tort and are not to be restricted to defaults and miscarriages arising Out Of contracts; Must be collateral Only and not primarily liable for the debt c. Agreement made in consideration of marriage other than “mutual" promise to marry □ not limited to marrying parties but also to promises by a third person to one of the parties contemplating the marriage d. Sale of goods, chattels or things in action, priced > P500 unless buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels or the evidences or some of them or pay at the time some part of the purchase money. EXCEPTION: sale is by auction and entry is made by auctioneer in his sales book (because it constitutes sufficient memorandum) e. Leasing for period longer than one year OR sale of real property or of an interest therein f. Representation to the credit of a 3 rd^ person
  6. Both parties are incapable of giving consent to contract Art 1403 Par 1: Unauthorized contracts Governing rules in Unauthorized Contracts: Art 1404 Governed by Art 131⁄ (no one may contract in the name of the other without being authorized or unless he has by law a right to represent him; representation without authority or legal representation makes the contract unenforceable) and principles of Agency in Title X of this Book
  • Does not having binding effect on the principal, UNLESS principal ratifies it which cures the unauthorized contract.
  • Agent who binds his principal without authority to do so is liable to 3rd^ persons. Art 1403 Par 2: Contracts covered by the Statute of Frauds Statute of Frauds: descriptive of statutes which require certain classes of contracts to be in writing. Merely regulates the formalities of the contract necessary to render it enforceable.
  • NOT APPLICABLE TO: (1)Action for specific performance, (2) Violation of the contract
  • APPLICABLE TO: Executory and not to complete or executed contracts □ intention of the

ACCION REIVINDICATORIA – any person may invoke the inexistence of the contract whenever juridical effects founded thereon are asserted against him Action to Declare Nullity

  • necessary because nobody can take the law into his own hands
  • if the void contract is still executory, no party need to bring an action; but if one party brings action to enforce it, nullity can be set up as defense Void/inexistent contracts distinguished from Other defective contracts VOID RESCISSIBLE Defect is inherent in the contract itself Defect is in their effects, either to one of the parties or to a 3rd^ party Matter of law and public interest Based on equity and more a matter of private interest No legal effects even if no action is taken to set it aside No action, remains valid and produces all its effects Action to declare nullity of void contracts never prescribes Action to rescind prescribes in 4 years VOID UNENFORCEABLE Cannot be the basis of actions to enforce compliance Can never be ratified and become enforceable Can be ratified and thereafter enforced There is no contract at all There is a contract which, however, cannot be enforced unless properly ratified VOID VOIDABLE One of those essential requisites is wanting, either in fact or in law or is declared void by statute Essential requisites for validity is present, BUT consent is vitiated No contract, but only appearance of one, produces no effect even if not set aside by direct action (collateral attack allowed) Valid until set aside, validity may only be assailed directly, never by a 3rd^ person Not susceptible of ratification May be rendered perfectly valid by ratification Action to declare nullity does not prescribe, permanent, even if the cause of nullity ceased to exist Action for annulment prescribes in 4 years Kinds Of VOid/Inexistent COntracts Art 1409 COntracts that are VOID Art 1409 Those whose cause, object or purpose is contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy a. Art 1411 When the act constitutes a criminal offense (illegality of cause or object) IN PARI DELICTO RULE
  1. BOTH are in pari delictO ▪ No action against each other ▪ BOTH will be prosecuted ▪ RPC provision relative to the disposal of effects/instruments of a crime shall apply
  2. ONLY ONE is guilty ▪ INNOCENT PARTY may claim what he has given ▪ INNOCENT PARTY not bound to comply with his promise Case:
  • Urada v Mapalad

b. Art 1412 When the act is unlawful but does not criminal offense IN PARI DELICTO RULE

  1. BOTH parties at fault ▪ Neither party may recover what he has given by virtue of the contract ▪ Neither party may demand the performance of the other´s undertaking
  2. ONLY ONE is guilty ▪ INNOCENT PARTY may demand the return of what he has given without obligation to comply with his promise ▪ PARTY AT FAULT cannot recover what he has given by reason of the contract ▪ PARTY AT FAULT cannot ask for the fulfillment of what has been promised to him □ Not applicable to fictitious contracts because they refer to contracts with an illegal cause or subject-matter (criminal offense OR only illegal), OR to contracts that are null and void ab initio. Fictitious or simulated contracts don´t have cause. Case:
    • Modina v CA EXCEPTIONS TO THE IN PARI DELICTO RULE General Statement of the Exception (Art 1416): Agreement is not illegal per se, but merely prohibited
  • Prohibition is designed for the protection of the plaintiff
  • Plaintiff may recover what he paid or delivered if public policy is enhanced
  • ILLEGAL PER SE – one that by universally recognized standards is inherently or by its very nature bad, improper, immoral or contrary to good conscience. Cases:
    • PBC v Lui She
    • Frenzel v Catito OTHER SPECIFIC EXCEPTIONS c. Art 1414 When the PURPOSE is illegal and money is paid or property delivered therefore □ maybe repudiated by one of the parties before the purpose has been accomplished OR before any damage has been caused to a 3 rd person. Courts may allow the party repudiating the contract to recover the money or property, if the public interest will thus be subserved. d. Art 1415 When the CONTRACT is illegal and one of the parties is INCAPABLE of giving consent □ courts may allow recovery of money/property delivered by the incapacitated person, if interest of justice so demands Case:
  • Liguez v CA
  • Relloza v Gaw Cheen Hun e. Art 141⁄ When the amount paid exceeds the maximum fixed by law □ any person paying in excess of the maximum price may recover such excess f. Art 1418 When by virtue of contract a laborer undertakes to work longer than the maximum number of hours of work fixed by law □ worked may demand additional compensation for service rendered beyond the limit g. Art 1419 When a laborer agrees to accept a lower wage than that set by law □ entitled to recover deficiency

Right to set up defense of illegality cannot be waived Art 1409 The action or defense for the declaration of the inexistence of a contract

  1. Art 1410 Does not prescribe, defect is permanent and incurable
  2. Art 1421 Is NOT available to 3rd^ persons whose interest is not directly affected ‡ Ratification may take the form of a new contract, in which case its validity shall be determined only by the circumstances at the time of the execution of the new contract. However, the same does not retroact to the constitution of the first contract.