Energy-Efficient Motors: Enhancing Efficiency and Cutting Costs in Water Treatment, Exams of Machine Design

Energy-efficient motors, their benefits, and their role in reducing energy costs and operating expenses in water and wastewater treatment facilities. Energy-efficient motors are more efficient than standard motors, with improvements such as lengthened cores, lower-electrical-loss steel, thinner stator laminations, and more copper in the windings. They also have longer insulation and bearing lives, lower heat output, and less vibration. In water/wastewater treatment, pump and blower motors account for a significant portion of energy costs, making energy-efficient motors a cost-effective solution for new installations, replacements, or as spares. Examples of cost savings and payback periods for energy-efficient motors.

Typology: Exams

2016/2017

Uploaded on 11/24/2017

manjeet-singh-3
manjeet-singh-3 🇮🇳

2 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ENERGY-EFFICIENT MOTORS
Energy-efficient motors, also called premium or
high- efficiency motors, are 2 to 8% more
efficient than standard motors. Motors qualify as
"energy-efficient" if they meet or exceed the
efficiency levels listed in the National Electric
Manufacturers Association's (NEMA's) MG1-
1993 publication.
Most general-purpose motors sold after October
1997 must meet the NEMA definition, according
to federal law. However, motors that exceed these
standards are readily available. Recommendations
on efficiency levels that exceed the standards can
be obtained for a given motor size from the
Consortium for Energy Efficiency.
Energy-efficient motors owe their higher
performance to key design improvements and more accurate manufacturing tolerances.
Lengthening the core and using lower-electrical-loss steel, thinner stator laminations, and more
copper in the windings reduce electrical losses. Improved bearings and a smaller, more
aerodynamic cooling fan further increase efficiency.
USE IN THE WATER/WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS
Pump and blower motors account for 80 to 90% of the energy costs in water supply and
wastewater treatment facilities, and the lifetime energy costs to run a continuous-duty motor are
10 to 20 times higher than the original motor purchase price. Thus, energy-efficient motors can
play a major role in reducing facility operating costs.
Energy-efficient motors should be considered for all new installations, replacement of failed
motors, or as spares. They are frequently a cost-effective alternative to rewinding, and are
sometimes an economic substitute for well-functioning motors in high-duty applications.
However, in cases where the faster speed of the energy-efficient motor results in higher energy
use without adding to the useful work performed, the energy-efficient motor may not be an
economic option. A cost comparison will determine if a motor replacement is cost effective, and
an analysis of the whole system--including the driven process, drive train, and controls--can
reveal if other changes could provide greater benefits.
BENEFITS
Energy-efficient motors generally have longer insulation and bearing lives, lower heat output,
and less vibration. In addition, these motors are often more tolerant of overload conditions and
phase imbalance. This results in low failure rates, which has prompted most manufacturers to
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Energy-Efficient Motors: Enhancing Efficiency and Cutting Costs in Water Treatment and more Exams Machine Design in PDF only on Docsity!

ENERGY-EFFICIENT MOTORS

Energy-efficient motors, also called premium or high- efficiency motors, are 2 to 8% more efficient than standard motors. Motors qualify as "energy-efficient" if they meet or exceed the efficiency levels listed in the National Electric Manufacturers Association's (NEMA's) MG1- 1993 publication.

Most general-purpose motors sold after October 1997 must meet the NEMA definition, according to federal law. However, motors that exceed these standards are readily available. Recommendations on efficiency levels that exceed the standards can be obtained for a given motor size from the Consortium for Energy Efficiency.

Energy-efficient motors owe their higher performance to key design improvements and more accurate manufacturing tolerances. Lengthening the core and using lower-electrical-loss steel, thinner stator laminations, and more copper in the windings reduce electrical losses. Improved bearings and a smaller, more aerodynamic cooling fan further increase efficiency.

USE IN THE WATER/WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS

Pump and blower motors account for 80 to 90% of the energy costs in water supply and wastewater treatment facilities, and the lifetime energy costs to run a continuous-duty motor are 10 to 20 times higher than the original motor purchase price. Thus, energy-efficient motors can play a major role in reducing facility operating costs.

Energy-efficient motors should be considered for all new installations, replacement of failed motors, or as spares. They are frequently a cost-effective alternative to rewinding, and are sometimes an economic substitute for well-functioning motors in high-duty applications. However, in cases where the faster speed of the energy-efficient motor results in higher energy use without adding to the useful work performed, the energy-efficient motor may not be an economic option. A cost comparison will determine if a motor replacement is cost effective, and an analysis of the whole system--including the driven process, drive train, and controls--can reveal if other changes could provide greater benefits.

BENEFITS

Energy-efficient motors generally have longer insulation and bearing lives, lower heat output, and less vibration. In addition, these motors are often more tolerant of overload conditions and phase imbalance. This results in low failure rates, which has prompted most manufacturers to

offer longer warranties for their energy-efficient lines.

Purchasing an energy-efficient motor can dramatically cut energy costs. For example, purchasing the energy-efficient version of a 25 horsepower, 1800-rpm, totally enclosed, fan-cooled 460-volt motor that runs 16 hours per day at 75% load will save $600 per year over a standard motor at an electrical rate of $0.10 per kilowatt hour. With a cost premium of $378, the simple payback is less than eight months.

Substituting the same energy-efficient motor for a standard motor due for rewind at a cost of $700 would save $710 per year, for a payback of slightly more than one year. When calculating operating costs for rewound motors, subtract 1 to 2 percentage points—or more if the motor has operated for many years—from comparable new motor efficiency ratings. If the same energy- efficient motor were to replace a working standard motor, the payback lengthens to 3.3 years.

PERFORMANCE HISTORY

Energy-efficient motors have a strong track record of high performance, with proven lower failure rates. As with all motors, materials and components can degrade during repair and rewind, reducing the original efficiency level. Insisting that the motor repair shop adhere to recommended quality standards can help maintain motor efficiency at or near original levels.

Many water/wastewater agencies are installing energy-efficient motors as part of a cost savings program. Encina Wastewater Authority estimates that it saves $15,000 annually using energy- efficient motors. The Moulton Niguel Water District specifies energy-efficient motors for all motors in new construction and for replacements.