

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Clarifications on the concepts of stream functions and potential functions in the context of 2d fluid dynamics. It covers topics such as mass flow, mass continuity equation, and the relationship between streamlines and stream function lines. It also explains the differences between various notations and their applications.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Lecture F12 Mud: Stream Function, Potential Function
(25 respondents)
1
represents mass flow perpendicular to the page”.
Isn’t 2-D flow in the plane of the page? (1 student)
It actually says “mass flow per unit depth perpendicular to the page”. The “perpen
dicular” refers to the unit depth, not to the flow.
� is the most general type of stream function, and gives the mass flux components:
��/�y = �u − ��/�x = �v
For low speed flows where � is a constant, it is convenient to absorb the constant �
factor into the stream function by defining � = �/�. We now have:
��/�y = u − ��/�x = v
It’s important to remember that � can be used only for low speed flows, while � has
no such restriction.
The difference � 2
1
gives the mass flow between two streamlines, while � 2
1
gives the volume flow between two streamlines (but only in low-speed flow).
x
2
2 come from? (1 student)
I just made it up. The neat thing about a stream function is that no matter how
complicated �(x, y) might get, the resulting u(x, y) and v(x, y) that you get from it
satisfy the mass continuity equation
ρ � ·V � �u/�x + �v/�y = 0
and hence represent a physically possible flow.
lines? (1 student)
Lines of constant stream function are the same as streamlines.
sent the same vortex flow? (1 student)
Both functions produce the same u(x, y) and v(x, y), and hence they both represent
the same physical flowfield.
The approach in Unified Fluids is to present concepts in the simplest way possible, so
that the understanding isn’t lost in unnecessary complexity. So we use the smallest
number of spatial dimensions in the examples and applications. Sometimes 1-D, usually
2-D, and occasionally 3-D if it’s unavoidable.
They are alternative ways to define the velocity field u(x, y) and v(x, y). There are
important differences also. For example, � is usable only in 2-D, while ∂ easily extends
to 3-D with minimal complication.
psi has several interpretations: streamlines, mass flow, as presented in the notes. ∂ is
a bit harder to interpret.
When applicable, they almost always produce a tremendous mathematical simplifica
tion of a fluid flow problem. This makes solving the equations much easier and/or
faster.
Yes. The main restrictions are: � and � are usable only in 2-D
∂ is usable only for irrotational flows.
justification? (1 student)
So far we’ve focused almost entirely on “tools and concepts”. Applications will come
next. Anderson lays out this strategy.
(1 student)
A directional derivative is normally computed using the dot product.
�∂/�n = �∂ ·nˆ
For example, say
∂(x, y) = − arctan(y/x)
and we want to know �∂/�n at the point (x, y) = (0, 1), along a line tilted 45
� up from
horizontal. Along this direction
n ˆ = �
ˆı + �
ψˆ
and the gradient at the chosen point is
�∂ = 1 ˆı + 0 ˆψ
Hence,
�∂/�n = �∂ · n ˆ = �