Natural Selection: Directional, Stabilizing, Disruptive and Sexual Selection, Study notes of Introduction to Cultural Anthropology

An overview of different types of natural selection, including directional selection, stabilizing selection, disruptive selection, and sexual selection. Each type is explained with examples and real-life cases. The document also covers the impact of environmental conditions on fitness values and the role of sexual selection in shaping traits.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/30/2009

koofers-user-61i
koofers-user-61i 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 21

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Natural Selection
Directional Selection
One trait is favored over others
Results in directional changes
Stabilizing selection
Promotes phenotypic uniformity
Disruptive selection
Intermediate traits are disfavored,
while two extremes are favored
Directional selection acting in several
directions.
A common allelic trait is favored, less
common are disfavored
510 15 20 25
Frequency
Me a n
5 10152025
Frequency
Me a n
510 15 20 25
Frequency
Me a n
510 15 20 25
Me a n Me a n
5 1015202530
Me a n
510 15 20 25
Me a n
Dire c tio na l Se le ctio n
Disrup tive Se le c tio n
Sta b ilizing Se le c tio n
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15

Partial preview of the text

Download Natural Selection: Directional, Stabilizing, Disruptive and Sexual Selection and more Study notes Introduction to Cultural Anthropology in PDF only on Docsity!

Natural Selection

-^ Directional Selection^ –^ One trait is favored over others^ –^ Results in directional changes •^ Stabilizing selection^ –^ Promotes phenotypic uniformity •^ Disruptive selection^ –^ Intermediate traits are disfavored,while two extremes are favored^ –^ Directional selection acting in severaldirections.^ –^ A common allelic trait is favored, lesscommon are disfavored

Me a n Frequency^5 10 15 20 255 10 15

25 Me a n Fre quency 5 10 15 Me a n Frequenc y^20 255

Me a n 5 10 15 20 25 Mea n 5 10 15 20 25 30 Me a nMe a n^15 20 Sta bilizing Selection^ Dire ctiona l Selection Disruptive Sele ction

Stabilizing Selection

-^ Reduces genetic variability by selecting out extremes (pulls in the “skirts”of the distribution. •^ Average individuals have higher fitness than individuals at the extremes. •^ The survival of sparrows during the winter of 1898 on sparrows^ –^ Wing length and other characteristics were correlated withsurvivorship.^ –^ Birds with average traits had a higher survival rate that smaller orlarger birds.

5 10 15

20 25 requencyF

Me a n

5 15 10 Mea n^20 Sta bilizing Selection

Stabilizing selection for number of offspring per birth • Clutch Size in Birds ¾ Too few eggs mean reproductive potentialis not met = lowered fitness ¾ Too many eggs means low fledglingsurvivorship = lowered fitness• The fact that humans usually give birth toone child is undoubtedly explained by lowsurvivorship of multiple births in earlierhuman populations.

Directional Selection

-^ Selection that favors one extreme •^ Responsible for evolutionary change •^ Examples:^ ¾^ Artificial selection is a special form of directional selection in whichhumans provide the selective pressure^ ¾^ Penicillin resistant Micrococcus Industrial melanism^ ¾^ Adaptation of humans and horses to environmental change

5 10 15

20 25 (^) Frequenc y

Me a n

5 10 15

Mea n^20 25

Directiona l Selection

The Peppered Moth Story

-^ The peppered moth story is anexample of directional selection •^ Light colored moths were favoredbefore pollution •^ Soot darkened the bark of treesand favored dark colored moths. •^ Later, when pollution was reducedthe reproductive success of lightcolored moths again increased •^ A good example of how the fitnessvalues associated with a trait iscontingent of currentenvironmental conditions.

Horse Evolution

-^ A well-documented example ofdirectional section in response toenvironmental change.•^ Grasslands expanded at the endof the Miocene epoch•^ These environmental changesproduced selective pressures thatfavored fewer toes and higher,longer wearing teeth in horses.

Diversifying Selection

-^ Also know as destabilizing ordisruptive selection •^ Promotes phenotypic differences,favors the presence of multiplealleles •^ Thought to be important in speciesformation •^ The fishing net analogy

Disruptive artificial selection onbristle number in

fruit flies

Balancing Selection

-^ Balancing selection occurswhen the heterozygote hashigher fitness thanhomozygotes •^ This is called heterozygoteadvantage •^ Balanced Polymorphism^ ¾^ The situation in whichheterozygotes have a selectiveadvantage over homozygotes^ ¾^ A balanced polymorphism existswhen an equilibrium amongdifferent alleles at a givenchromosomal locus

Balanced Polymorphism 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 AA Aa^

aa Genotype Fitness

The Spread of the S Allele

Sexual Selection

•^ Darwin’s (1871)definition of sexualselection:^ "sexual selection depends noton a struggle for existence inrelation to other organicbeings or to externalconditions, but on a strugglebetween the individuals of onesex, generally the males forpossession of the other sex."

Sexual Selection and Sexual Dimorphism • Sexual dimorphism:morphological differencesbetween the sexes • Over mates tends oftenfavors larger male size incomparison to that offemales as is exemplifiedby the elephant seal • The angler fish is anexception

Sexual Selection and Natural Selection • Sexual selection and naturalselection can reinforce eachother as well as act at cross-purposes • A trait that increases success inattracting mates (a longer tail)may increase vulnerability topredators • Ultimately an equilibrium willbe reaches between thepressures of sexual selection andnatural selection.

Sexual Selection in Humans • How can we explain the physical differences between human males andfemales ¾ To what extent are they a result of natural selection? ¾ To what extent are they a result of sexual selection? • Darwin’s perspective

: "We may conclude that the greater size, strength, courage, pugnacity, and energy man, in comparison with woman, wereacquired during primeval times, and have subsequently been augmented,chiefly through the contests of rival males for the possession of the females."Charles Darwin,

Descent of Man

Sex Differences in the Human Pelvis

-^ Natural selection

favored a pelvic outlet large enough togive birth to large-headedbabies.• Sexual selection

may have reinforced this: males mayhave preferred mates withwider hips• Wide hips:^ present mechanicaldifficulties during running (lossof energy through angularmomentum. This wouldcounterbalance their obstetricaladvantage• Narrow hips:

women may have preferred males withnarrower because of itsassociation with running abilityand hunting prowess

Man^

Woman Chimpa nzee^

Gorilla^

Woma n Bre a dth idthW Shoulde rs