

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An analysis on whether Nick Carraway is considered to be a good or bad person.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Stallings 1 Lindsay Stallings Ap Lang Argument Essay Mr. Walker
Being a good person consists of a variety of character traits, some of the traits include honesty, kindness, courage, and trust: Whether that's the ability to trust others or others ability to trust you. Nick Carraway is a good person to the eye, but a closer look at him reveals that he has shortcomings when it comes to being truly good. Nick consistently points out malicious physical and verbal actions in the text, but fails to ever voice his opinion or point out other characters' wrong doings out loud. Nick Carraway comes off as a good person in the text based on the fact that people like and get along well with him, he comes off as trustable.”I hate careless people. That's why I like you.” In said scene Jordan and Nick are riding in the car together and Nick points out how careless she is while driving, to which she responds that people will stay out of her way inferring that other people aren’t as careless as her. Nick refutes that and asks what if the other driver isn’t careful and she responds with the past quote. Another way we can see that Nick is considered to be trustable is Gatsby's assurance that he can share his plans concerning daisy. “I’m going to make a big request of you to-day.” In this chapter Gatsby is taking Nick to lunch and uses this opportunity to pull Nick into his scheme. Gatsby knows that what he is doing is wrong, that's why he has made such discreet moves and decisions. So it's obvious that Gatsby must trust that Nick will not only help but keep his scheme a secret. But ultimately a place where Nick comes short is his lack of action when it comes to others questionable actions. Like his complacentness when setting up his married cousin Daisy with his neighbor Gatsby. “He wants to know if you’ll invite Daisy to your house some afternoon and then let him come over.” “I’m going to call up Daisy to-morrow and invite her over here to tea.” In these past quotes Nick was asked by Jordan to help in setting Gatsby and Daisy up, and then Nick goes to Gatsby and agrees to help, even negotiating what day and time to do so. Nick knows that encouraging an affair is bad, but does it anyway. To know the situation is morally wrong is not enough to make you a good person. Not only being a bystander but also immersing yourself in the controversy is not something a good person would do. Another area in which Nick fails to “be a good person” is his hypocriticalness throughout the text. He makes it abundantly clear at the beginning of the text that he refrains from judging others. “Whenever you feel like criticizing any one just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.” Such a quote came from his father and has stuck
Stallings 2 with Nick ever since. Though Nick fails at the claim, his observations of others are rather judgements. This is apparent in his thoughts about Tom and Jordan. “There was something pathetic in his concentration, as if his complacency…was not enough to him any more.” “Jordan Baker…was incurably dishonest. She wasn’t able to endure being at a disadvantage and, given this unwillingness…keep that cool, insolent smile…demands of her hard, jaunty body.” Nick is consistently rather harsh in his observations of others when their opinions or actions don’t align with his. Often using cruel words like pathetic or insolent to express his discontent. His quickness to judge others silently makes him a bad person, not because of the opinions he has, but because he uses them to put himself above others while still associating with the people he judges. I think Nick comes off as a good person when you first are introduced to his character, and I also believe that Nick thinks he is a good person. Regardless of what he thinks or truly wants Nick partakes in actions that he simultaneously criticizes. He's a judgemental bystander that also takes part in the problem. His character translates to people outside of the book, in the 1920’s and the 2000’s. It's a lesson to all to really evaluate not only who they say they are but who others say they are.