Notes on Hypothesis Testing - Inference Theory | MATH 7654, Study notes of Mathematics

Material Type: Notes; Class: Inference Theory; Subject: MATH Mathematics; University: University of Memphis; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/28/2009

koofers-user-nu5
koofers-user-nu5 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 18

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis Testing Basics
Tests for Normal/Binomial distributions
Most Powerful Tests (MP)
UMP (Uniformly Most Powerful) Tests
MLR (Monotone Likelihood Ratio)
Likelihood Ratio Tests
Sample size/power/Chi-square Tests
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12

Partial preview of the text

Download Notes on Hypothesis Testing - Inference Theory | MATH 7654 and more Study notes Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Hypothesis Testing^ „^ Hypothesis Testing Basics^ „^ Tests for Normal/Binomial distributions^ „^ Most Powerful Tests (MP)^ „^ UMP (Uniformly Most Powerful) Tests^ „^ MLR (Monotone Likelihood Ratio)^ „^ Likelihood Ratio Tests^ „^ Sample size/power/Chi-square Tests

Hypothesis Testing Basics^ „^ Formulation of H

vs H^0 „^ (Ch 8.1, page 373-374) „ Type I vs. type II error calculation „^ (Ch 8.3, page 382) „ Power function calculation „^ (Def. 8.3.1, page 383-385) „ size^ α^ test vs. level

α^ test „^ (Def. 8.3.5 and Def. 8.3.6, page 385)

Types of Hypothesis Testing^ X^ , X, …, X^1

i.i.d. ~p.d.f. f(x;n

θ).

„^ H^ :^ θ^0

=^ θvs. H^0

:^ θ^ =^ θ 1

1 (simple vs. simple) „^ H^ :^ θ^0

=^ θvs. H^0

:^ θ ≠ θ 1

0

(simple vs. composite, two-sided) „ H :^ θ ≤ θ 0

vs. H 0 :^ θ^ >^ θ 1

0

(composite vs. composite, one-sided)

Test about Normal Distribution^ „^ One sample:^ „^ Mean μ, (

(^2) σknown/unknown) „^ Variance

(^2) σ. „^ Two samples:^ „^ Difference μ

(^2) - μ(σ 12 (^2) = σ, 1 2 (^22) σ≠ σ^1

) 2

„^ Ratio or equality of variances

(^2) σand^1 (^2) σ.^2

Two samples tests^ „^ Equality of μ

and μ 12 (^2) „ (σ=^1 (^2) σ) : use pooled-variance.^2 (^2) „ (σ≠ σ^1 2 ) : use Welch approximation.^2 „^ Equality of variances

(^2) σand^1

(^2) σ.^2

„^ F-test can be used. „^ Important to known the relation betweenupper/lower percentiles of F-table.

  • Test about BinomialDistributions „ One sample „ X ~ B(n,p) „ H: p = p
    • vs H: p
    • ≠ p
      • „ Test statistic/critical region? „ Two samples: „ X~ B(n
        • ,p) independent of X
        • ~ B(n
        • ,p )
          • „ H: p
          • = pvs. H
          • : p≠ p

Most Powerful Tests (MP)^ Neyman-Pearson Lemma^ X^ , X, …, X^1

i.i.d. ~p.d.f. f(x;n

θ).

„^ H^ :^ θ^0

=^ θvs. H^0

:^ θ^ =^ θ 1

1 (simple vs. simple) „^ f( x ;θ)=

Π^ f(x^ ;θi^

) = L(θ

| x ).

„^ MP Test: reject H

:^ θ^ =^0

θif^0 f( x ;^ θ)/f(^0

x ;^ θ)≤^1

k.

Uniformly Most Powerful Tests^ X, X, …, X^12

i.i.d. ~p.d.f. f(x;n

θ). H:^ θ ≤ θ^0

vs. H 0 1 :^ θ^ >^ θ^0

„^ If the rejection region of the MP Test^ H

:^ θ^ =^ θ 0

vs. H 0 1 :^ θ^ =^ θ 1

^ θ. 0

is the same for any

θ, then MP is UMP.^1 „^ UMP Test does not exist for two sided

H:^ θ^ =^0

θvs. H^0

:^ θ ≠ θ 1 0

„^ In that case, we find unbiased test. (UMPU)

Likelihood Ratio Tests

H:^ θ ε Θ^0

vs. H 0 1 :^ θ ε Θ 0 c Θ^ =^ ΘU^0

c Θ 0

„^ λ( x )= sup

L( x θ ε Θ 0 |θ)/ supθ ε

L( x |θ)Θ

„^ LRT: (Def. 8.2.1, page 375)

Reject H

if^ λ( x ) 0

≤^ k.

„^ Techniques needed:^ „^ Find MLEs under the condition

θ ε Θand^0

θ ε Θ.

„^ Get a specific critical region.

Likelihood Ratio Tests^ X^ , X, …, X^1

i.i.d. ~p.d.f. f(x;n

θ).

H^ :^ θ ≤ θ^0

vs. H 0 :^ θ^ >^1

θ^0

„^ supθ ≤ θ

L( x |θ) is a constrained 0 maximization problem. Solution may beat its boundary (

θ).^0 „^ supθ^

L( x |θ) is a regular MLE problem.

MLR and Exponential family^ „^ Exponential family

f(x;^ θ)=a(x) b(

θ) exp(c(

θ) d(x))

„^ If X, X^1

, …, Xi.i.d. ~ f(x; 2 n^

θ),

„^ T( X )=^ ∑

d(X) is SS fori

θ. „^ If c(θ) is monotone, then f(x;

θ) has MLR and

critical region of UMP test for H

:^ θ ≤ θ 0

vs. 0

H:^ θ^ >^1

θis of the form^0 „ T( X ) > k.

Examples of LRT^ „^ e.g. 8.2.2. (page 375-376): LRT for anormal population with known varianceand unknown mean.^ „^ e.g. 8.2.3. (page 376) ): LRT for ashifted exponential population.^ „^ e.g. 8.2.6. (page 378-379): LRT for anormal population with unknownvariance and unknown mean.