Download nursing and research paperwork and more Cheat Sheet Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!
JOURNAL CLUB PRESENTATION ON A
QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT
AND NURSE OUTCOMES OF BEDSIDE
NURSING REPORT IMPLEMENTATION
MEHREEN MARYAM
NR
WALDEN UNIVERSITY
OCT 9, 2018
COMPONENT OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE
- (^) Title: to inform readers what the article is about. (Fischer,& Zigmond, 2004)
- (^) Authors: to specify the individual who is responsible for the research presented in the paper. (Fischer, et al., 2004)
- (^) Addresses: to indicate the institution where research was performed (Fischer, et al., 2004)
- (^) Abstract: provide the summary (Fischer, et al., 2004)
- (^) Introduction: provide the reader with the background information on the research (Fischer, et al., 2004)
- (^) Method: allow a reader to evaluate the work performed (Fischer, et al., 2004)
ARTICLE CITATION
- (^) Article citation:
- (^) Sand-Jecklin, K., & Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23 (19-20), 2854-2863. doi:10.1111/jocn.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
- (^) The purpose of the study was to determine the statistical significance of bedside reporting with patient and nurse satisfaction and patient safety outcome.
SAMPLE SELECTION
- (^) Convenience sample
- (^) All nurses whose home unit was a Medical-Surgical unit.
- (^) Nurses age range was 24-34 y/o.
- (^) Mean number of years in nursing was 10.2-10.5 and mostly held BSN
- (^) Medical-Surgical unit patients scheduled for discharge.
- (^) Family member if the patient was unable to complete the survey.
DATA COLLECTION METHOD/MEASURES/
TOOLS
Patient Survey:
- (^) Data collection method used by researcher was survey. Survey forms were handed to the patient or family member.
- (^) Patient Survey had 17 items dealing with behaviors: treating the patient kindly and with respect, listening to the patient, informing the patient about their care, teaching so that the patient could understand, working with other nurses, passing along information from shift to shift, including the patient in report discussions and keeping the patient's health information private (Sand-Jecklin & Sherman 2013 ).
DATA COLLECTION METHOD/MEASURES/
TOOLS
- (^) Nurses Survey:
- (^) All nurses on the unit received an email with the survey link.
- (^) The 17-item nursing survey contained items such as perceived efficiency and effectiveness of report; perceptions of report helping to identify recent changes in patient status and promote patient safety; whether they felt that report promoted patient involvement in care; the influence of report on nurse mentoring, teamwork and accountability; and perceptions of whether report provided all information needed for patient care (Sand‐ Jecklin & Sherman 2013).
DATA COLLECTION METHOD/MEASURES/
TOOLS
- (^) All items had a five-point Likert-type response option, with five indicating excellent care and one indicating poor care. (Sand-Jecklin & Sherman, 2013
- (^) Instrument reliability (Cronbach’s α) was 0.90, with interitem correlations ranging from 0.20–0.
- (^) Demographic items were part of the survey.
PLANS FOR DATA ANALYSIS
- (^) The researcher used ANOVA comparison for both pre and post implementation of patient and nurse survey responses with the descriptive analysis of medication errors and falls. The comparison was made between baseline survey responses, three-month responses and 13-month survey responses for nurse overtime. Descriptive analysis with thematic coding was completed for patient narrative comments and narrative nurse survey. (Jecklin & Sherman, 2014)
PLANS FOR DATA ANALYSIS
- (^) Overall instrument reliability for the patient survey, Cronbach's α was 0.96, and interitem correlations ranged from 0.49–0.80.
- (^) Instrument reliability (Cronbach’s α) for nurses survey was 0.90, with interitem correlations ranging from 0.20–0.
WEAKNESSES
- (^) The researcher used the convenience sample. (Jecklin & Sherman,
- (^) A nurse may have completed multiple surveys. (Jecklin & Sherman,
- (^) Patient and nurses reported some inconsistencies which the researcher didn’t measure. (Jecklin & Sherman, 2014)
REFERENCES
Complete dissertation. (2018). Quasi-experimental Research Designs. Retrieved from http://www.statisticssolutions.com/quasi-experimental-research-designs/ Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2004, July 9). Components of a research article. Retrieved from http://www2.gsu.edu/~bioslp/Sci_Methods_Neuro/ComponentsofaResearchArticl e.pdf Sand-Jecklin, K., & Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23 (19-20), 2854- 2863. doi:10.1111/jocn.