Nutrition Care Process: Intervention Documentation ..., Study notes of Nutrition

Nutrition Diagnosis Example. “Inadequate protein intake (P) related to changes in taste and appetite (E) as evidenced by (S).

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/07/2022

nabeel_kk
nabeel_kk 🇸🇦

4.6

(65)

1.3K documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
11/18/2013
1
MAKING THE BEST BETTER:
CONTINUOUS NCP
IMPROVEMENT
WEBINAR SPONSORED BY:
MEDICAL NUTRITION PRACTICE GROUP
Karen Lacey MS, RD, CD
Dietetic Director Emeritus, UW-
Green Bay
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Objectives
Utilize critical thinking in the application
of the Nutrition Care Process
Evaluate the quality of PES statements
Utilize the nutrition intervention
standardized language
Identify appropriate outcome measures
and indicators for nutrition monitoring
and evaluation
Questions ?????
How to write accurate PES statements
(confusion between etiology and signs and
symptoms)
What to do if there are no nutrition problems
How best to use when patients are
hospitalized for a short period of time
Questions about the use of the IDNT
Charting
How best to use the standardized language
How/where to start
Revised NCPM, 2008
Nationwide data results
April 2013 Readex Survey Results
Random sample of registered dietitians (over
3000 responded) = 95 % confidence level
Questions:
NCP is easy to understand; scale of 1-11; 1= very
strongly disagree, 11= very strongly agree
Are you familiar with the NCP?; yes or no
Various stages of implementation of each step
Change is fully institutionalized, Implemented, Training, Determining implementation
plan, Aware of need, Not currently aware, Don't know
Summary of Key Results
NCP is easy to understand = mean of 7.5
(2013)
NCP is easy to understand (% that responded
9,10,11)
2011; 31%
2013; 35%
Familiar with NCP (% that responded yes)
2011; 45%
2013; 54%
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Nutrition Care Process: Intervention Documentation ... and more Study notes Nutrition in PDF only on Docsity!

MAKING THE BEST BETTER:

CONTINUOUS NCP

IMPROVEMENT

WEBINAR SPONSORED BY: MEDICAL NUTRITION PRACTICE GROUP Karen Lacey MS, RD, CD Dietetic Director Emeritus, UW- Green Bay Wednesday, November 20, 2013 Objectives  Utilize critical thinking in the application of the Nutrition Care Process  Evaluate the quality of PES statements  Utilize the nutrition intervention standardized language  Identify appropriate outcome measures and indicators for nutrition monitoring and evaluation Questions ?????  How to write accurate PES statements (confusion between etiology and signs and symptoms)  What to do if there are no nutrition problems  How best to use when patients are hospitalized for a short period of time  Questions about the use of the IDNT  Charting  How best to use the standardized language  How/where to start Revised NCPM, 2008 Nationwide data results  April 2013 Readex Survey Results  Random sample of registered dietitians (over 3000 responded) = 95 % confidence level  Questions:  NCP is easy to understand; scale of 1-11; 1= very strongly disagree, 11= very strongly agree  Are you familiar with the NCP?; yes or no  Various stages of implementation of each step Change is fully institutionalized, Implemented, Training, Determining implementation plan, Aware of need, Not currently aware, Don't know Summary of Key Results  NCP is easy to understand = mean of 7. (2013)  NCP is easy to understand (% that responded 9,10,11)  2011; 31%  2013; 35%  Familiar with NCP (% that responded yes)  2011; 45%  2013; 54%

Stages of Implementation Stage of Implantation Assessment Diagnosis Intervention Monitoring & Evaluation Fully institutionalized 22.32 % 25.22 % 22.3 % 21.26 % Implemented 37.61 % 39.05 % 37.98 % 37.38 % (subtotal) 59.93 % 64.27 % 60.28 % 58.64 % Training 4.84 % 5.43 % 5.96 % 6.42 % (total) 64.77% 69.7% 66.24% 65.06% Critical Thinking Nutrition Assessment

  • Organize & cluster data according to possible diagnoses
  • Determine appropriate data to collect
  • Distinguish important & relevant data from unimportant and irrelevant data Nutrition Diagnoses - Find patterns and relationships among data and possible causes - Rule in/rule out specific diagnoses - State problem clearly and singularly Critical Thinking Nutrition Intervention
  • Set and prioritize goals
  • Match intervention strategies with client needs, diagnoses and values
  • Specify the time and frequency of care Nutrition Monitoring & Evaluation
  • Select appropriate indicators and measures
  • Use appropriate reference standards for comparison

Nutrition Assessment/Monitoring

and Evaluation Domains

 Food/Nutrition-Related History (FH)  Food and Nutrient Intake  Food and Nutrient Administration  Medication and Complementary/Alternative Medicine Use  Knowledge/Beliefs/Attitudes  Behavior  Factors Affecting Access to Food and Food/Nutrition Related Supplies  Physical Activity and Function  Nutrition-Related Patient/Client-Centered Measures

Nutrition Assessment/Monitoring

and Evaluation Domains

 Anthropometric Measurements (AD)  Biochemical Data, Medical Tests and Procedures (BD)  Nutrition-Focused Physical Findings (PD)  Client History (CH)  Comparative Standards (CS) What’s New – Assessment?

  1. Academy Unique Identifier (used to track data EMR)
  2. US and metric measures
  3. More specific terms for vitamins/minerals
  4. New terms within physical activity and function
  5. Revised shading areas for assessment only

Nutrition Counseling:

Theoretical Basis/Approach (1)

Cognitive – Behavioral Theory Health Belief Model Social Learning Theory Transtheoretical Model/Stages of Change Other

Nutrition Counseling: Strategies (2)

 Motivational interviewing  Goal setting  Self-monitoring  Problem-solving  Social support  Stress management  Stimulus control  Cognitive restructuring  Relapse prevention  Rewards/contingency management

Coordination of Nutrition Care

 Consultation with, referral to or coordination of nutrition care with other providers, institutions or agencies that can assist in treating or managing nutrition- related problems What’s New? – Intervention

  1. Terms that reflect the type of action taken: recommend, implement, order, initiate, modify or discontinue
  2. More specific terms for many of the food/nutrient classifications

Intervention – 2 parts

#1 Set goals  Based on signs and symptoms  The indicator that you will monitor and evaluate  Nutrition Prescription or Goal/Expected Outcome  Reference Standard (e.g. national, institutional and/or regulatory standard) #2 Implement intervention  Based on etiology

Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation

 Measuring  Select the nutrition care outcome indicator to measure the desired outcome (initial and subsequent)  Monitoring  Review the data at scheduled intervals  Evaluate  Systematic comparison of current findings with previous status, intervention goals or reference standard

Nutrition Monitoring & Evaluation

Terminology

 Refer to Nutrition Assessment Terminology  Additional Specific to Monitoring and Evaluation

Diagnosis Terminology Flow

Sheet

Nutrition Diagnostic Terminology Intake Clinical Behavioral/ Environmental Energy Balance Oral or Nutrition Support Intake Fluid Intake Bioactive Substances Nutrient Functional Biochemical Weight Knowledge and Beliefs Physical Activity and Function Food Safety and Access Fat and Cholesterol Mineral Vitamin Carbohydrate and Fiber Protein

What’s New? - Nutrition Diagnoses

  1. Additional terms for documenting vitamin/mineral intake
  2. Enteral/parenteral; now less than optimal composition or modality
  3. Inappropriate intake of fats (specify); now leas than optimal intake of types of fats
  4. Harmful beliefs/ attitudes…; now Unsupported beliefs/attitudes…. Other more recent
  5. Energy Balance  Predicted suboptimal energy intake NI-1.  Predicted extensive energy intake NI-1.
  6. Multi-nutrient  Predicted suboptimal nutrient intake NI-5.11.  Predicted excessive nutrient intake NI-5.11.
  7. Biochemical: Predicted food-medication interaction NC-2.
  8. No nutrition diagnosis at this time NO-1.

Using the Diagnostic Terminology

 All the terms can/must be used as the “Problem”  Some terms can also be used as the “Etiology” (can also be free text)  Some terms can also be used as “Signs and Symptoms” as long as accompanied by actual data (can also be free text) Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Assessment Diagnosis Intervention Mon & Eval Problem Etiology Signs & Symptoms Nutrition Diagnosis Labels Intake Domain (excessive or inadequate intake of xx) Use of Nutrition Dx Terms

Evaluating your PES statement Problem (P)  Can the nutrition professional resolve or improve the nutrition diagnosis?  When all things are equal and you have a choice between stating the PES statement using two nutrition diagnosis labels from different domains, consider the intake nutrition diagnosis as the one most specific to the role of the RD. Evaluating your PES statement Etiology (E)  Is the etiology listed the “root cause”?  Ask “Why?” 5 times  Can you envision an intervention that would address the etiology and thus resolve the problem?  If you are unsure about resolving the problem by addressing the etiology, is your intervention targeted to reducing or eliminating the signs and symptoms?

Evaluating your PES statement

Signs & Symptoms (S)  Will measuring the Signs and Symptoms tell you if the problem is resolved?  Are the Signs and Symptoms specific enough that you can measure/evaluate changes at the next visit to document resolution of the nutrition diagnosis? PES Overall  Does the nutrition assessment data support a particular nutrition diagnosis with a typical etiology and signs and symptoms? A Well-Written PES Statement  Simple, clear and concise  Specific to the patient/client or group  Descriptive of a single nutrition – related problem  Accurately related to an etiology  Based on reliable and accurate nutrition assessment data Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Assessment Diagnosis Intervention Mon & Eval Problem Etiology Signs & Symptoms

Relationship of PES

Statements to NCP Steps

Example: Nutrition Support PES  (P) Inadequate enteral nutrition infusion  (E) related to: increased residuals and holding of TF for 2 hours  (S) As evidenced: by 24 hour infusion less than goal by 500 ml Intervention: Nutrition Support  Part 1: Nutrition Prescription and Goals  Based on estimated nutrient needs using accurate reference standards  Provide goal nutrients per estimated needs within 24 hours  Part 2: Select Intervention  Enteral Nutrition ND-2.  Options of changing formula concentration or rate  Medications ND-6.  Review options of gastric motility medications as appropriate Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Assessment Diagnosis Intervention Mon & Eval Problem Etiology Signs & Symptoms

Relationship of PES

Statements to NCP Steps

Monitoring and Evaluation  Calculate 24 nutrient infusion of enteral feedings  Montior for tube feeding tolerance Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition Nutrition (re)Assessment Diagnosis Intervention Mon & Evaluation Problem Etiology Signs & Symptoms Relationship of PES Statements to NCP Steps

Case Example: ICU patient meeting current

nutrition goals with enteral or parenteral nutrition  32 y.o. male admitted to the ICU with traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle crash. 6'1" and 200 lbs  Previously healthy and well nourished prior to admission  Pt is on mechanical ventilation and tolerating tube feedings at goal rate.

Evaluation of intake PES BEFORE Inadequate oral intake related to clinical status/physiological causes increasing nutrient needs (wound healing), as evidenced by poor appetite/intake, clinically significant weight loss, h/o low pre-albumin, dependence on multiple nutrition supplements to meet increased nutrient needs, and stage IV pressure ulcers Critical Thinking  Too much data; not singular  The S/S includes some data that describe the etiology  Difficult to establish measurable goals  The etiology does not lend itself to a clear and logical nutrition intervention Evaluation of Intake PES  P= Inadequate oral intake  E= increased nutrient needs secondary to wound healing of stage IV pressure ulcer  S= observed poor intake of nutritional supplements, patient c/o decreased appetite and unintended weight loss of …… (quantifiable amount) Implementation of NCP  Nutrition prescription: estimated calorie and protein needs to support increased needs  Goal: patient improve appetite and intake to meet needs; weight stable  Intervention:  Meals/Snacks: protein modified ND-1.  Supplements: commercial beverage ND-3.1. Evaluation of Clinical PES BEFORE:  Altered GI function related to small bowel obstruction as evidenced by ngt for suctioning

AFTER:

 Inadequate oral intake related to altered GI function secondary to small bowel obstruction and ngt suctioning as evidenced by NPO status X 3 days. Implementation of NCP  Intervention (2 parts)  Goals: Meet nutrient needs within 24 hours bypassing GI route (clearly linked to S)  Parenteral Nutrition/IV Fluids (2.2) Provide recommendations Composition and Rate ND-2.2.1 & ND 2.2.

Evaluation of Behavioral-Environmental PES BEFORE:  Food/nutrition related knowledge deficit related to lack of prior exposure to information as evidenced by pt’s questions/concerns

AFTER:

 Food/nutrition related knowledge deficit as evidenced by pt’s questions/concerns regarding ………. (specify examples of such questions)  May not need E (redundant) Common Issues  No apparent nutrition problems  Document pertinent data from assessment and clearly state “no nutrition diagnosis at this time”  Follow institution’s P & P for routine rescreening or reassessment as conditions might change  ND 3rd^ Edition: Predicted suboptimal energy intake NI-1.6 and Predicted excessive energy intake NI-1.

Documentation of Assessment

 Date and time of assessment  Pertinent data collected  Comparison with standards Documentation, cont  Patient/client/groups’  Perception  Values  Motivation related to presenting problems  Changes in patient/client/group’s  Level of understanding  Food-related behaviors  Other clinical outcomes  Reason for discharge and/or /discontinuation if appropriate Select Documentation Format  Modified SOAP format  PES statement at conclusion of A section  ADI format  Narrative with PES statement  Discuss how to handle routine “screening” assessments where there is no problem  Determine your guidelines for how much is enough, too much, just right  Document only terms; not the codes or numbers Documentation  PES statement (s) that reflect the intervention that you are making  Alternative method of documenting the other problems identified during an assessment  Progress notes in other places in chart  M & E section to be addressed later  Separate document: Kardex etc.