Parametric Design of Mechanical Systems: A Case Study on Bolt and Belt Pulley Design, Slides of Computer-Aided Design for Engineers

An in-depth analysis of parametric design in mechanical engineering through a case study on the design of a bolt and belt pulley system. It covers topics such as configuration design, information flow, parametric design, performance predictions, and design decision-making. The document also includes real-life application examples and seismic protection analysis.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/30/2013

abhae
abhae 🇮🇳

4.4

(9)

43 documents

1 / 57

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ParaMetric
Design
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39

Partial preview of the text

Download Parametric Design of Mechanical Systems: A Case Study on Bolt and Belt Pulley Design and more Slides Computer-Aided Design for Engineers in PDF only on Docsity!

ParaMetric

Design

OutLine  ParaMetric Design

  • Design phase info flow
  • Parametric design of a bolt
  • Parametric design of belt & pulley
  • Systematic parametric design
  • Summary

Information Flow

Special Purpose Parts: Features Arrangements Relative dimensions Variable list Standard Parts: Type Variable list

Parametric Design variable values Design e.g. Sizes, dimensions Materials Mfg. processes Performance predictions Overall satisfaction Prototype test results

Detail Design Product specifications Production drawings Performance Tests Bills of materials Mfg. specifications

ConFig Design

Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer [email protected]

Engineering 11

Real Life

Application

3x00 Seismic Protection Analysis Plan

  • Measure/Calc Weight and Center of Gravity
  • Consult S2/§19 for Lateral Loading Criteria (0.63g)
  • Consult Mechanical Design Drawing for Seismic Structural- Element Location & Configuration
  • Use Newtonian Vector Mechanics to Determine Force & Moment Loads
  • Use Solid-Mechanics Analysis to Determine Fastener (Bolt) Stresses
  • Use Mechanical-Engineering & Materials Properties to determine Factors of Safety

BMayer

3x00 Seismic Loading & Geometry

BMayer

Loading Geometry Detail

Bracket Stress Analysis

  • Analysis Parameters
    1. Assume Failure Point at M6 or M10 Bolts
    2. FOUR (4) Angle Brackets With a total of 8 Connecting & Anchor Bolts, Resist Shear
    3. Two Bolts Per Point, Each Bolt Bears 50% of Load
    4. Bolt Axial-PreLoad is negligible (Snug-Fit)
    5. Shear Load Per Restraint Point = 500lb/2.22kN
    6. Use Von Mises Yield Criteria: S (^) sy = 0.577Sy
  • Results

2.22 kN

Bolt Bolt Ssy Load Stress,^ τ^ Factor of Size & Fcn Material (MPa) (MPa) Safety M6 Connector SS-304 139.1 13.84 10. M10 Anchor SS-304 139.1 4.74 29. 3x00_Seismic_Analysis_0202.xls Docsity.com

ParaMetric Bolt Design

  • From Analysis Determine Failure Mode as AXIAL TENSILE YIELDING (E45)
  • The Configuration Design Sketch

d

L

LT

shank

head

threads

Load Load

Use Engineering Analysis

  • Using ENGR36 Methods Determine the Bolt Load as 4000 lb (4 kip)
  • Thus the “Functional Requirement” for the Bolt

Fp ≥ 4000 lbs

 To Actually Purchase a Bolt we need to Spec a DIAMETER, d , and a length, L  Find d Using the FR & Stress-Eqn

p

AS (^) p Fp A S

4000 lbs = ≥ 4000 lbs ⇒ ≥

Design DECISION

  • We Now need to make a Design Decision – We get to CHOOSE - Bolt MATERIAL  Gives Proof Stress - Bolt DIAMETER  Gives Supporting Area
  • In this Case Choose FIRST a Grade-5, Carbon-Steel Bolt with S p = 85 000 psi (85 ksi)

Spec Bolt

  • We can PICK any Grade-5 Bolt with a Diameter >0.245” - To Keep down the Bulkiness of the Hardware choose d = ¼” (0.25”)
  • Thus We Can Specify the Bolt as
    • Grade-
    • ¼-20 x 6”
      • CHOOSE Coarse Thread (the “20”)
      • CHOOSE a Bolt Length of 6” based on size of Parts Connected

Forward & Inverse Analysis

  • As Design Engineers we Can approach the quantitative Functional Requriments (FR’s) in Two Ways
  1. Forward ≡ Guess & Check
  • Set the ENGR-Spec and then Check if the FR is Satisfied (The Seismic Case)
  • e.g; Guess a ½-12 Grade-2 bolt & chk S (^) p
  1. Inverse
  • Start with FR and Use Math & Science to effectively DETERMINE the ENGR-Spec