

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This is a pedagogy assignment for those who are doing Managing the curriculum module.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Understanding learner development: Piaget Week 1 Question 1: ✓ In the scenario we are introduced to Sydney who has been exposed to a fish and stored within his Schema. When he enters the Aquarium, he is exposed to a fish which has a different colour but is familiar to him because it had fins and lived under water which was what had been registered into his schema before. In this point he can easily associate with what he sees as it fits into his previous schema and equilibrium is easily reached. This process is known as Assimilation. ✓ But when he looks on the other tank he is exposed to different thing, which also lives under water. He is then perplexed whether it is also a fish, but he cannot identify it as a fish as it had no fins. At this stage, cognitive conflict occurs which causes a disequilibrium. Then his teacher comes in to explain that what he sees is a Crab. He then processes this new information and creates a space in his schema to differentiate the fish from the crab, and now understands that a crab has legs, not fins but also lives under water. At this point Accommodation process took place as new information has been registered into his schema for equilibrium to be reached. ✓ As he now moves to another tank and sees another creature that has legs and lives under water, he can now identify the animal as a crab and not a fish. This shows that there has been cognitive development and that equilibration has taken its course. Question 2:
2. 1 ➢ From the scenario we are told that the place which is based is in a creche and we are aware that children in creches have an age range of 0-2 years of which falls under the sensorimotor stage. ➢ Piaget’s theory states that children think with their eyes, ears, and hands. From this view then we can see and argue that the toddle at the creche is in sensorimotor stage. Firstly, she gets excited from bashing the toy down, this
shows and proves Piaget’s theory that infants learn through their senses and (motoric) actions, and by experimenting with actions. ➢ Now she tries to bash it again and slips out of her hand and rolls out of her sight. But instead of going after the toy she grabs the other one closer to her and starts playing because babies are object permanence. By this we can see what is in the theory that infants/babies are only aware of what is immediately in front of them. 2. 2 .2.1 Based on my observations, Alice and Sabelo are not in the same cognitive development stage, Alice is probably on the Preoperational cognition while Sabelo is in Concrete operational cognition. Alice falls under the preoperational cognition mainly because he lacks conservation, where he cannot differentiate the difference between quantity and quality, while Sabelo can logically think and see the difference between quantity and quality. And yes, they might be of the same age because cognitive development occurs in different speed on different individuals. 2.2.2 He would be able to combine, order, and transform objects in his mind. But he can only make reason by actual (concrete) pictures or objects. 2.3 From the scenario it is evident that the learners are in the formal operational stage, because they can deduce conclusions from abstract content of which in this case is the electric circuit. They are hypothetically and scientifically reasoning, and their concrete operations operate on reality while their formal operations operate on operations itself. Therefore, we can conclude that the learners in this scenario are in a Formal operational cognition. 2. 4 The cognitive stage of the girl is Formal operational cognition as she can critically explain and understand metaphors, which means her cognition stance is more advanced and can understand critical abstract information easily while her younger brother is in the concrete operational cognition as he bases his understanding and explanation on actual (concrete) evidence or information to make conclusions not on illusions or metaphors. Question 3: 3 .1 The learners find it hard to understand the concepts because they are not presented with concrete/ actual pictures or objects for them to make sense of them. Secondly, they cannot do tasks in their heads. (Concrete Operational stage). 3.2 To improve my teaching so they could understand the 3D objects, is to bring the actual objects with me to class and distribute it among them so they could investigate the objects, and that way they would be able to answer the questions I will present to them in regard to the 3D objects.