

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Philippine Insurgency and the declaration of Martial Law
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


The Philippine insurgency has been going on for 53 years already. It has left a tragic tail of death, destruction, and human suffering with few parallels in the world today. It has traumatized people to extremes of fear, uncertainty, hopelessness, frustration, and desperation. Since Marcos’ proclamation of Martial Law and his regime’s desperation to end the communist rebellion, how is it that it only continued to persist, and at some point, extend to various places in the nation? Time and time again, the Philippines has always been met with different attempts of suppression by the ruling classes taking hold on the broader masses in order to better hold absolute power. Even before Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s proclamation of Martial Law, a series of blood baths; human rights violations, assassinations, as well as several deaths and disappearances were already happening in the country. At this point in Philippine history, its contribution and relevance continue to be commemorated and discussed and became even more timely as the son of the very man who pronounced the Martial Law crawled its way back to Malacañang. There is a crisis and there is a nation. Both things existed at the same time in a nation struggling. In this telltale, there is a need to understand the very root of rebellion and how Marcos saw the need to declare Martial Law, as well as suspend the writ of habeas corpus in an attempt to suppress this rebellion. On September 18, 1972, Marcos issued a Letter of Instruction to take over the media, mainly ABS-CBN and TV5. Even before his declaration, state agents were arrested and imprisoned. Over the course of his reign, the crisis had gotten worse as the debt increased. The income of agricultural workers declined by at least 30% from PHP 42 in 1962 to PHP 30 in 1986. The external debt went from $0.36 billion to $28.26 billion. These economic declines continued. The basic commodities tripled and left the people in starvation, all while the Marcoses and his cronies remained in power and their wealth increased. And what breeds resistance if not the crisis itself? The downfall of the Philippine economy that Marcos himself drove the nation to, was met with protests, pleas, demands to overthrow, and human rights investigations, which all were responded to with nothing but deafened ears, unresponsive to the masses, and human rights abuses by the state. Thus, this negligence caused the people to uprise. The nation continues to be in crisis and in response, Marcos mobilized the AFPs and the PNP to further subdue this resistance. Even as popular opposition continues to mount, the Marcos administration persisted in ramming the authoritarian option down the people’s throats. This leaves the people with practically no choice but to exercise continuing vigilance and pursue a militant struggle for the democratic rights and interests of the greater number against the self- serving interests of a privileged few in the corridors of power. Thus, the emergence of the New People’s Army. It is to take note that more than a military objective, it was more of a political goal that was designed to abolish
the system that was designed to allow the people in power to further exploit those that are under them. And then, again, as always, in his response, was the proclamation of Martial Law. Hence, the New People's Army, and the communist group persists even up until now. The chains and fetters may well be the outstanding feature of the centennial of the Philippine revolution in depicting the tyranny of oppressive rule that gave rise to a people’s revolution.