






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Physics law and motion there are numerous topics covered involving newtons laws
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 11
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!







A mousetrap racer (MTR) is a spring-powered vehicle that uses elastic potential energy to revolve the axle and accelerate the car forward. The relationship between its mass and acceleration, when propelled with a constant driving force on a horizontal surface, demonstrates Newton's laws of motion. Newton's first law of motion, an object will remain at rest unless acted upon by an external force, correlates with the constant driving force and the MTR. (Encyclopedia Britannica 1998). The external force, the mousetrap assumed to exert a constant force in Newtons, powers the car causing motion from rest. Newton's second law states that force is equal to mass times acceleration which is indirectly proportional when rearranged to force divided by mass equals acceleration (The Physics Classroom 2021). Figure 1: Formula of Newton's 2nd Law revealing force is equal to mass multiplied by acceleration. Figure 2: Newton’s 2nd law rearranged to show acceleration is indirectly proportional to force, divided by mass. Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so when a pulling force propels the car, the reactive force is friction, assumed to be constant, and air resistance assumed to be negligible (Hall 2022). Figure 3: A free-body diagram of the forces acting upon the car which include:
Extended ● Average velocity substituted for final velocity. Distance and time recorded to find average velocity to calculate acceleration using the equation: ● Average acceleration plotted against weight to demonstrate relationship between mass and acceleration. Refined ● Three trials per mass used to calculate average velocity and acceleration. ● Five different masses recorded to create scatter plot to demonstrate relationships between mass and acceleration.
Risk Level Control Lacerations Medium Keep scissors and saw blades covered and use facing away from the user. Contusions Low Keep mousetrap unactivated until trials. Punctures Medium Aim tools away from user when using. Burns Medium Use PPE when operating
hot glue gun.
Qualitative: The car with the additional 50g had the fastest and farthest distance over time compared to the car with no additional weight. As the weight increased after 50g, the car began to slow down over time. Quantitative: Table 1: Raw Data of Distance, Time, and Average Velocity Trials Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Avera ge Weig ht of Car (g) Dista nce (m) +/- 0.5cm Time (s) +/- 0.05s Avera ge Veloci ty (m/s in a directi on) Dista nce (m) +/- 0.5cm Time (s) +/- 0.05s Avera ge Veloci ty (m/s in a directi on) Dista nce (m) +/- 0.5cm Time (s) +/- 0.05s Avera ge Veloci ty (m/s in a directi on) Avera ge Veloci ty (m/s in a directi on)
6
Outliers Table 2: Average Acceleration, Force and Uncertainties Acceleration (m/s^2 in direction)
—————————- = Average 3 0.18 = Average Absolute Uncertainty (Max-Min) ————— = Absolute Uncertainty 2 0.19-0. ————— = Absolute Uncertainty 2 0.01 = Absolute Uncertainty Percentage Uncertainty Absolute Uncertainty —————————- x 100 = % Uncertainty Average
—————————- x 100 = % Uncertainty
5.56 = Percentage Uncertainty
Figure 6: Average Acceleration Vs Weight of Car Graph
This investigation analyses the relationship between mass and acceleration of a MTR. The graph demonstrates a linear relationship between a car's decreasing weight and increasing acceleration further supported by the trendline. The trendline shows a strong correlation, supported by the r^2 value, representing accuracy between two variables by the variation between data and trendline values, the closer to one the more accurate. The error bars represent the uncertainty of the averages due to errors. Y=mx+c, where c is the value of the changing force applied to the car as it accelerates. It is assumed the car has a constant driving force with and without additional weight due to acceleration decreasing as mass increases. The y-intercept shows a value above zero, proving the driving force of the mousetrap wasn’t constant, lowering the causation and accuracy of the experiment. The random error occurred during trial 2 of 277.16g, falsifying the measurement to be further than average. Another error is force isn’t constant due to an invalid method. Newton’s second law states that force is equal to mass times acceleration, meaning that acceleration is indirectly proportional to force divided by mass when rearranged. And is demonstrated throughout the experiment and graph This correlates with the graph as you must lower the mass and increase the force to maximise acceleration. Newton's third law states that every force has an equal and opposite reactive force meaning that adding weight to the car, causes more drag requiring more force to overcome friction. The frictional force is increased, but the driving force remains constant to push the car with
in results. that tracks acceleration and deceleration and apply it to the MTR. Further investigating Newton's laws, replacing the mousetrap with a different consistent driving force, an electric force, reducing the previous inaccuracies. Also investigating a moving vehicle down a slope to measure the acceleration of gravity and how it acts as a force on masses. These extensions would further prove Newton's second law and support the linear relationship between acceleration and mass.
This investigation determines the relationship between the mass and net force of a MTR when propelled by a constant, driving force and horizontal surface. The results demonstrated a linear relationship between increasing acceleration as mass decreases. Random errors including chassis integrity, string tension and axle drift, are factors that influenced the uncertainty of the experiment. To further extend this investigation, use a constant driving force mechanism like an electric engine or force like gravity.