



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Average 0.042 0.117 1.184 0.9 0.2058 0.5733 0.35047 0 -0.
Average 0.1 0.04 1.208 0.77 -0.2646 0.196 0.437784 0 -0.
The initial assumption of the frictional losses was very accurate to be exact it was a small percentage of 4% of the overall ener
The two most significant sources of error in this experiment would happen to be the possibility of the table being unevenlly b could be blind to the naked eye. Another significant source of error In the experiment will be the air resistance in the room wh the possible 4% difference.
The effect of these errors on the final calculation of the energy conservation would cause an uncertainty for each one of the fi which would give a uncertainty final calculation of 4 %. It shows us that there is a 4% loss of energy of the friction that occure experiment.
My trials were very consistent of the same configuration of the experiment, they were so close that they were off by .01. No, not consistent with my estimated uncertainty, it's because my variations were off by 1% and my uncertainty was about a 4% d between all the trials.
t they were off by .01. No, my variation was certainty was about a 4% difference
s involved, you need to say ist calculations as an error m.