Approximate Vertical Vorticity Equation in Atmospheric Dynamics II, Lecture notes of Meteorology

An explanation of the approximate vertical vorticity equation for synoptic scale flows in the context of Atmospheric Dynamics II. The instructor, Alan Shapiro, discusses the simplification of the equation and the special case of incompressible, barotropic, and nearly geostrophic flows. Integration of the equation over the atmosphere's height is also covered.

Typology: Lecture notes

2019/2020

Uploaded on 06/08/2020

beatryx
beatryx 🇺🇸

4.6

(16)

289 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
METR 3123, Atmospheric Dynamics II
Alan Shapiro, Instructor
Wednesday, 23 April 2008 (lecture 40)
1 handout: prob set 7
In last class we showed that the approximate vert vort eqn
appropriate for synoptic scale flows is:
∂ζ
t+u∂ζ
x+v∂ζ
y=–(ζ+f)δβv
and that this can be rewritten in terms of absolute vert vort
η
(
ζ
+f)
, as
∂η
t+u∂η
x+v∂η
y=–ηδ
Can simplify them. Introduce
D
h
Dt
t+u
x+v
y
(total
deriv following horiz motion of an air parcel), get:
for relative vert vort:
D
h
ζ
Dt =–ηδ βv
for absolute vert vort:
D
h
η
Dt =–ηδ
Now consider the special case where:
(i) Flow is incompressible (
∇⋅u=0
, so parcel volume is
const)
u
x+
v
y+
w
z=0
,
u
x+
v
y=–
w
z
,
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Approximate Vertical Vorticity Equation in Atmospheric Dynamics II and more Lecture notes Meteorology in PDF only on Docsity!

METR 3123, Atmospheric Dynamics II Alan Shapiro, Instructor Wednesday, 23 April 2008 (lecture 40)

1 handout: prob set 7

In last class we showed that the approximate vert vort eq n appropriate for synoptic scale flows is:

∂ζ ∂t

  • u

∂ζ ∂x

  • v

∂ζ ∂y

= – (ζ + f) δ – βv

and that this can be rewritten in terms of absolute vert vort η (≡ ζ + f) (^) , as

∂η ∂t

  • u

∂η ∂x

  • v

∂η ∂y = – η δ

Can simplify them. Introduce

D (^) h Dt

∂t

  • u ∂ ∂x
  • v ∂ ∂y (total

deriv following horiz motion of an air parcel), get:

for relative vert vort:

D (^) hζ Dt

= – η δ – βv

for absolute vert vort:

D (^) hη Dt

= – η δ

Now consider the special case where:

(i) Flow is incompressible (∇ ⋅^ u = 0^ , so parcel volume is

const) ∴ ∂ ∂ux +^ ∂ ∂vy +^ ∂ ∂wz = 0^ , ∴ ∂ ∂ux +^ ∂ ∂vy = –^ ∂ ∂wz ,

(ii) Flow is barotropic (ρ = ρ(p) ∴ no shear of geos wind, i.e.,

no thermal wind, and

(iii) Flow is "nearly" geostrophic. Replace wind in vert vort eqn

by geostrophic wind except for δ in stretching term.

So ζ ≈ ζg =^

∂v (^) g ∂x

∂u (^) g ∂y

∂t

  • u ∂ ∂x
  • v ∂ ∂y

∂t

  • u (^) g ∂ ∂x
  • v (^) g ∂ ∂y

But δ^ is not^ ≈ δg Remember, horiz divergence of geos wind

is 0 (on an isobaric sfc). Don't approximate δ.

D (^) hη (^) g Dt

= – η (^) g δ

D (^) h Dt

ζg + f = – ζg + f ∂u ∂x

  • ∂v ∂y

––> – ∂ ∂wz

[don't use geos wind in this term]

D (^) h Dt

ζg + f = ζg + f ∂w ∂z

In barotropic flow u (^) g and vg are indep of p -- so nearly indep of z

∴ ζg is indep of z

D (^) hζg Dt is indep of z.

Since w(z) = Dz Dt

So w(D^2 ) =^

D

Dt

D 2 (x,y,t) =

∂D 2

∂t

  • u

∂D 2

∂x

  • v

∂D 2

∂y

D (^) hD (^2) Dt

w(D 1 ) = D Dt

D 1 (x,y) = u

∂D 1

∂x

  • v

∂D 1

∂y

D (^) hD (^1) Dt

∴ D^2 – D^1

D (^) h Dt

ζ + f = ζ + f

D (^) hD (^2) Dt

D (^) hD (^1) Dt

∴ H

D (^) h Dt

ζ + f = ζ + f

D (^) hH Dt

∴ H

D (^) h Dt

ζ + f – ζ + f

D (^) hH Dt

This is b Da Dt

  • a Db Dt where b = H, a = ζ + f. Can simplify it.

Scratch paper_______________________

D Dt

a b

=^1

b

Da Dt

  • a D Dt

b

=^1

b

Da Dt

  • a b 2

Db Dt [mult by b^2 ]

∴ b^2

D

Dt

a b

= b Da Dt

  • a Db Dt

∴ H^2

D (^) h Dt

ζ + f H

= 0 (^) divide by H 2

Barotropic Potential Vorticity Conservation Theorem (due to Carl Gustav Rossby):

D (^) h Dt

ζ + f H

= 0 (^) (for an air column)

or:

ζ + f H

= const (^) (for an air column)

ζ + f H is potential vorticity,

absolute vorticity column thickness

This theorem says that potential vorticity is conserved -- an air column's potential vorticity does not change.

e.g. Consider case of horizontal convergence

z

∴ H ↑

But from pot vort th m^ ,

ζ + f H is constant.