

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This case study explores the impact of various parameters on the bioavailability of high and low extraction drugs, calculates hepatic clearance and volume of distribution for a patient with liver failure, and identifies whether drugs are filtered, reabsorbed, or secreted based on their free fraction and renal clearance.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Case Study 4 PHA 5127 Fall 2006
1 A. What happens to the bioavailability of a high extraction drug when the following parameters are increased: Fu, QH, Clint
As (^) Fu and Clint increase the bioavailability decreases. As QH increases the bioavailability increases. F=QH/(Fu*Clint)
B. Explain why changes in the above parameters do not change the bioavailability of a low extraction drug?
With a low extraction drug we know that a large amount of drug gets into the body and avoids first pass metabolism, meaning the extraction ratio is very small. This means that the bioavailability is about 1 (F=1-E, F~1). By changing the small extraction ratio there is not much effect on bioavailability. Changing F from 99% from 98% is insignificant.
ke =-ln(0.65/1.31)/(8-3)=0.14/hr C 0 = 1.31exp(0.143)=1.99 mg/L Vd = Dose/C 0 =70/1.99=35.2L Cl = keVd=0.1435.2=4.93L/hr Clren = GFRfu=13060*0.4/1000=3.12L/hr Clhep = 4.93-3.12=1.81L/hr
T F highly ionized substances tend to remain in the urine T F tubular reabsorption can only be an active transport process T F fluid is filtered across the glomerulus through passive diffusion
A drug with fu = 0.1 and a ClREN = 20 mL min-1^ is Actively secreted
A drug with fu = 0.40 and a ClREN = 52 mL min-1^ is Filtered A drug with fu = 0.30 and a ClREN = 0.45 mL min-1^ is Fully reabsorbed