

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Problem set 3 for the spring 2000 solid state ii course. The problems cover topics such as the ising model, magnetization, and hund's rules. Students are required to use software from the sss package, compare experimental results with theoretical predictions, and estimate critical temperatures. Reading materials include ashcroft & mermin and kittel.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


PHZ7427–Solid State II Spring 2000 Problem Set 3 Feb. 17, 2000
Due: Mar. 3, 2000 Reading: Chs. 31-33, Ashcroft & Mermin; Ch. 4, Kittel
The Ising model is H = −
∑
ij n.n.
SiSj −
∑
j
SiH, (1)
where the first sum is over nearest neighbor sites (“n.n.”), and H is an external field.
(a) Use preset 2 to obtain a quantitative plot of magnetization vs. field at T = 50J. Run until program stops with maximum number of sweeps set to 200. Increase external field by 10J by moving field slider, and run again. Repeat up to a field of 100J. Note since you were increasing the field at a constant “rate”, you have a plot of magnetization vs. field at fixed temperature. Save as postscript file and print to hand in. (b) In the dimensionless units used by the simulation, the magnetization of a free spin in a noninteracting paramagnet is
M(T ) = tanh(H/T ); (2)
note this is the same as the Brillouin function defined in the notes for the case of spin = 1/2.
Compare the experimental values detemined in (a) with Eq. (2). Is the magnetization you measured more or less than predicted? Why? (c) Use preset 2 and take a data series recording T , H, 〈M〉 and 〈(M − 〈M〉)^2 〉. Choose H values large enough so that M is easily measurable, but small enough so that M stays less than 0.25, so that you are in the linear field regime, and can sensibly define χ = M/H. Start reducing the temperature (you will find you will have to reduce H as well to satisfy the above conditions). Be sure to reset the graph before each change in T! Try to estimate the temperature where the susceptibility χ diverges. One way is to plot χ−^1 vs. T. (d) Convince yourself that the mean field theory result for M,
M = tanh
) (3)
implies a Curie-Weiss form of the susceptibility,
χ =
T − θ
with θ = 4J. How well does your “experimentally” determined value for the critical temperature match with the mean field value for θ?
(a) Using the formalism discussed in class & Kittel, calculate an approximate form for the number of magnons thermally excited at a low temperature T Tc in an isotropic Heisenberg system on a simple cubic lattice with ferromagnetic coupling J. (b) Use the result from (a) to calculate the temperature dependence of Mz , the magnetization in the ordered state.