Business Decision Making: Preferences and Decision Making, Lecture notes of Economics

A series of lecture notes from a Business Decision Making course taught by Prof. Dr. Matthias Raith at Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. The notes cover the topic of Preferences and Decision Making, including preference relations, rational preferences, change of criteria, and continuity. The document also discusses the value function and decision problem in the context of constrained optimization.

Typology: Lecture notes

2019/2020

Uploaded on 11/13/2020

tanjib-mahmud
tanjib-mahmud 🇧🇩

3 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Prof. Dr. Matthias Raith
Chair of Entrepreneurship Business Decision Making
November 9, 2020 1
Organizational Announcements
Exercises can be solved alone or in working groups (up to four
members). Each working group member must individually
submit solutions (for bonus points).
For submitted solutions, students can receive four different
grades:
0,0 : Exercise sheet incomplete, bonus point exercise(s) not
satisfactory
0,1 : Exercise sheet incomplete, bonus point exercise(s)
satisfactory
1,0 : Exercise sheet complete, bonus point exercise(s) not
satisfactory
1,1 : Exercise sheet complete, bonus point exercise(s)
satisfactory
Six (50%) of the exercise sheets must be completed, in order
to be admitted to the final exam.
A maximum of 10 achieved bonus points will be added to the
score of the final exam, but only if the exam is passed.
1
Types of Decision Making 2
Review of Last Lecture
Elimination by aspects
Lexicographic Criteria
Semi-lexicographic Ordering
Satisficing Principle
compensatorynon-compensatory
•Even Swaps
•SMART
Stochastic Dominance
Types of Decision Making: Procedures that one can
analyze and compare according to some specified criteria.
The criteria could be related to the procedure itself or to
the outcomes of the procedure.
If the criteria for a “good” procedure are known, one could
even design a decision procedure.
Paul Goodwin and George Wright (2009):
Decision Analysis for Management Judgment, 4th ed., ch. 2
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Business Decision Making: Preferences and Decision Making and more Lecture notes Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Organizational Announcements

  • Exercises can be solved alone or in working groups (up to four members). Each working group member must individually submit solutions (for bonus points).
  • For submitted solutions, students can receive four different grades: - 0,0 : Exercise sheet incomplete, bonus point exercise(s) not satisfactory - 0,1 : Exercise sheet incomplete, bonus point exercise(s) satisfactory - 1,0 : Exercise sheet complete, bonus point exercise(s) not satisfactory - 1,1 : Exercise sheet complete, bonus point exercise(s) satisfactory
  • Six (50%) of the exercise sheets must be completed, in order to be admitted to the final exam.
  • A maximum of 10 achieved bonus points will be added to the score of the final exam, but only if the exam is passed. 1

Types of Decision Making 2

Review of Last Lecture

  • Elimination by aspects
  • Lexicographic Criteria
  • Semi-lexicographic Ordering
  • Satisficing Principle

non-compensatory compensatory

  • Even Swaps
  • SMART
  • Stochastic Dominance

Types of Decision Making: Procedures that one can analyze and compare according to some specified criteria.

The criteria could be related to the procedure itself or to the outcomes of the procedure.

If the criteria for a “good” procedure are known, one could even design a decision procedure.

Paul Goodwin and George Wright (2009): Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 4th ed., ch. 2

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Business Decision Making

- Preferences and Decision Making -

Prof. Dr. Matthias Raith Chair of Entrepreneurship Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg http://www.entrepreneurship.ovgu.de

Preferences and Decision Making 4

Structure of the Course

**1. Introduction

  1. Types of Decision Making
  2. Preferences and Decision Making
  3. Multiattribute Decisions
  4. Decisions under Uncertainty
  5. Sequential Decision Making
  6. Strategic Interactive Decision Making
  7. Group Decision Making**

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Preferences and Decision Making 7

Change of Criteria

Example:

10 € used alternatively to buy a theater ticket, netflix, or a book.

Theater ticket  netflix Repeated pleasure

Importance of education

Break from studies

netflix  Book

Book  Theater ticket

Preferences and Decision Making 8

Change of Frames

Imagine that you are about to purchase a stereo for 125 dollars and a calculator for 15 dollars. The salesman tells you that the calculator is on sale for 5 dollars less at the other branch of the store, located 20 minutes away. The stereo is the same price there. Would you make the trip to the other store?

A. MasColell, M.D. Whinston, J.R. Green: Microeconomic Theory , 1995

Imagine that you are about to purchase a stereo for 125 dollars and a calculator for 15 dollars. The salesman tells you that the stereo is on sale for 5 dollars less at the other branch of the store, located 20 minutes away. The calculator is the same price there. Would you make the trip to the other store? Because of a stockout you must travel to the other store to get the two items, but you will receive 5 dollars off on either item as compensation. Do you care on which item this 5 dollar rebate is given? x = Travel to the other store and get a 5 dollar rebate on the calculator. y = Travel to the other store and get a 5 dollar rebate on the stereo. z = Buy both items at the first store. x z and z  y, butx y

x z

z y

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Preferences and Decision Making 9

Change of Meaning

Logic is better than Nothing;

Nothing is better than Sex.

Anthony Blair, Philosopher

Preferences and Decision Making 10

Group Decisions

a b c b c a c a b

Decision by simple majority vote: Who prefers a to b? 1 and 3 Who prefers b to c? 1 and 2 Who prefers c to a? 2 and 3

Group decisions based on simple majority vote may imply intransitive preferences, even though the preferences of each individual group member are transitive! Condorcet Paradox

Group of Decision Makers

Individual Rational Preference Profiles

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Preferences and Decision Making 13

Decision Problem

max ( )

s.t.

v a

a  A

If the preferences of the decision maker can be characterized by a value function, then the decision problem can be formulated as constrained optimization problem.

This perspective takes the the set of alternatives as given.  Alternative Focused Thinking

Preferences and Decision Making 14

Further (convenient) assumptions

v : A  

v is twice continuously differentiable

v has a stationary point at a^ *^ , where v '( a *) 0.

v ''( a^ *^ )  0  a *^ is amaximum point

v ''( a^ *^ )  0  a *^ is aminimum point

A is a continuous set

Chair of Entrepreneurship

15

Objectives and Decision Contexts

S Strategic Objectives f Fundamental Objectives i Instrumental Objectives A, a Alternatives

a A

i

f

S

Preferences and Decision Making

Value Information

Factual Information

Decision Context

Ralph Keeney: Value-Focused Thinking. A Path to Creative Decision Making , 1992

Preferences and Decision Making

Strategic Objectives

  • The highest, most general objectives
    • remain stable over longer periods of life.
    • are relevant for most decision contexts.
  • Ultimate fundamental objectives
    • must be unattainable, in order to retain the incentive to take action.
    • must be approachable, in order to preserve their influence on behavior.
  • Strategic objectives serve as ideals.
  • Working hypothesis: A vision comprises a bundle of ideals. Russell L. Ackoff: The Art of Problem Solving , 1978 16

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Preferences and Decision Making

Network of Instrumental Objectives

Fundamental Objective

Instrumental Objective

Instrumental Objective

Instrumental Objective

Instrumental Objective

Instrumental Objective

 Towards a Fundamental Objective „Why is that important?“  Away from a Fundamental Objective „How can this be achieved?“

19

Preferences and Decision Making

Objective Hierarchies and Networks

Fundamental Objectives Instrumental Objectives

Direction: Downward in the hierarchy Away from fundamental objectives

Question: What exactly does this mean?

How can this be achieved?

Direction: Upward in the hierarchy Towards fundamental objectives

Question: Of which more general objective is this an aspect?

Why is that important?

R. T. Clemen, T. Reilly: Making Hard Decisions , 2001 20

Chair of Entrepreneurship

Preferences and Decision Making 21

Viewing Problems as Opportunities

  • oblem
  • bjectives
  • lternatives
  • onsequences
  • radeoffs

Pr

O

A

C

T

Value focused thinking

Alternative focused thinking

Hammond, Keeney, Raiffa: Smart Choices , 1999

Preferences and Decision Making 22

Covey’s Habit 2:

Begin with the End in Mind

Value-Focussed Thinking

Alternative-Focussed Thinking

Reactive Problem Solving: Proactive Planning: Take the Best – make it reality

Conceptualization of a desired future and the search for ways to reach this state as effectively as possible.

Take whatever is available – choose the best alternative

Moving away from something undesired, does not bring you closer to something desired.

Unconstrained Thinking

Constrained Thinking

Russell L. Ackoff: The Art of Problem Solving , 1978

Stephen R. Covey: The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, 1989