Prime numbers and prime polynomials, Exams of Number Theory

Prime number theorem for polynomials. Let π(q;d) denote the number of monic, degree d irreducibles over the finite field Fq. Then as.

Typology: Exams

2022/2023

Uploaded on 03/01/2023

jannine
jannine 🇺🇸

4.9

(15)

239 documents

1 / 26

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Prime numbers and prime
polynomials
Paul Pollack
Dartmouth College
May 1, 2008
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a

Partial preview of the text

Download Prime numbers and prime polynomials and more Exams Number Theory in PDF only on Docsity!

Prime numbers and prime

polynomials

Paul Pollack Dartmouth College

May 1, 2008

Analogies everywhere!

  • Analogies in elementary number theory (con- tinued fractions, quadratic reciprocity, Fer- mat’s last theorem)
  • Analogies in algebraic number theory (the theory of global function fields vs. the the- ory of algebraic number fields)
  • Analogies in analytic number theory, espe- cially prime number theory

Prime number theorem (Hadamard, de la Vall´ee Poussin). If π(x) denotes the number of primes p ≤ x, then

π(x) ∼ x log x

as x → ∞.

Prime number theorem for polynomials. Let π(q; d) denote the number of monic, degree d

irreducibles over the finite field Fq. Then as

qd^ → ∞, we have

π(q; d) ∼ qd d

Notice that if X = qd, then qd/d = X/ logq X.

Gauss’s take on the prime number theorem: Empirical observations suggest that the primes near x have a density of about 1/ log x. So we should have

π(x) ≈

log 2

log 3

log x

Theorem (von Koch). If the Riemann Hypoth- esis is true, then

π(x) =

∑ 2 ≤n≤x

log n

  • O(x^1 /^2 log x).

Define πp(X) as the number of n ≤ x which

encode irreducible polynomials over Fp.

We might hope that

πp(X) ≈

∑ ||f ||≤x

deg f

Theorem. If X ≥ p, then

πp(X) =

∑ ||f ||≤x

deg f

+ O

( dpd/2+

) ,

where pd^ ≤ X < pd+1.

Notice dpd/2+1^ p X^1 /^2 log X, so this is a von Koch analogue.

Proof idea: To each global function field K

(finite extension of Fq(T )) one associates a

zeta function,

ζK(s) =

∑ a≥ 0

Nm(a)s^

A deep theorem of Weil asserts that these zeta functions all satisfy the analogue of the Rie- mann Hypothesis.

Define L-functions which are sensitive to the behavior of the initial coefficients of a polyno-

mial in Fq[T ]. The analytic properties of this

L-function can then be linked to the analytic properties of ζK(s) for an appropriate K and the Riemann Hypothesis brought into play.

Theorem (Hall). Suppose q > 3. Then there are infinitely many monic irreducibles P (T ) over

Fq for which P (T ) + 1 is also irreducible.

Theorem (P.). Suppose q > 3. Then there are

infinitely many monic irreducibles P (T ) over Fq

for which P (T ) + 1 is also irreducible.

Theorem (Capelli’s Theorem). Let F be any field. The binomial T m^ − a is reducible over F if and only if either of the following holds:

  • there is a prime l dividing m for which a is an lth power in F ,
  • 4 divides m and a = − 4 b^4 for some b in F.

Observe: We have

x^4 + 4y^4 = (x^2 + 2y^2 )^2 − (2xy)^2.

A finite field analogue of Hypothesis H. Suppose f 1 ,... , fr are irreducible polynomials

in Fq[T ] and that there is no irreducible P in

Fq[T ] for which

P (T ) always divides f 1 (h(T )) · · · fr(h(T )).

Then f 1 (h(T )),... , fr(h(T )) are simultaneously irreducible for infinitely many monic polynomi-

als h(T ) ∈ Fq[T ].

Example: “Twin prime” pairs: take f 1 (T ) := T and f 2 (T ) := T + 1.

Observation: The local condition is always sat- isfied if

q >

∑^ r i=

deg fi.

Theorem (P.). Suppose f 1 ,... , fr are irreducible

polynomials in Fq[T ]. Let D =

∑r i=1 deg^ fi. If q > max{ 3 , 22 r−^2 D^2 },

then there are infinitely many monic polynomi- als h(T ) for which all of f 1 (h(T )),... , fr(h(T )) are simultaneously irreducible.

Choose any prime l dividing q^2 − 1, and let let

χ be an lth power-residue character on Fq 2. If

there is no such β, then ∑ β∈Fq

χ(β + i) = q.

But Weil’s Riemann Hypothesis gives a bound for this incomplete character sum of √q – a contradiction.

Quantitative problems and results

Twin prime conjecture (quantitative version). The number of prime pairs p, p + 2 with p ≤ x is asymptotically

2 C 2 x log^2 x

as x → ∞,

where C 2 = ∏ p> 2 (1 − 1 /(p − 1)^2 ).

Can generalize to the full Hypothesis H situa- tion (Hardy-Littlewood/Bateman-Horn).

Theorem. Let n be a positive integer. Let f 1 (T ),... , fr(T ) be pairwise nonassociated ir-

reducible polynomials over Fq with the degree

of the product f 1 · · · fr bounded by B.

The number of univariate monic polynomials h of degree n for which all of f 1 (h(T )),... , fr(h(T ))

are irreducible over Fq is

qn/nr^ + O((nB)n!Bqn−^1 /^2 )

provided gcd(q, 2 n) = 1.

Example: The number of monic polynomials

h(T ) of degree 3 over Fq for which h(T )^2 + 1

is irreducible is asymptotically q^3 /3 as q → ∞ with q ≡ 3 (mod 4) and (q, 3) = 1.

Some ideas of the proof

The inspiration:

Conjecture (Chowla, 1966). Fix a positive in- teger n. Then for all large primes p, there is

always an irreducible polynomial in Fp[T ] of the

form T n^ + T + a with a ∈ Fp.

In fact, for fixed n the number of such a is asymptotic to p/n as p → ∞.

Proved by Ree and Cohen (independently) in