Prioritization Matrix - Lecture - Production Management, Lecture notes of Production Planning and Control

Detail Summery about Prioritization Matrix, Criteria Prioritization Matrix, Purpose, Task Prioritization Matrix,Example: Prioritization Grid.

Typology: Lecture notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 09/07/2011

eagleeye
eagleeye 🇮🇳

4.6

(12)

40 documents

1 / 19

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
[Rajesh Dhake]
Prioritization Matrix
These tools prioritize tasks, issues, alternatives,
etc., based on weighted criteria
A prioritization matrix is used to make decisions
based on multiple criteria, i.e. when there are
multiple alternatives and multiple criteria
Types:
Criteria Prioritization Matrix
Task Prioritization Matrix
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13

Partial preview of the text

Download Prioritization Matrix - Lecture - Production Management and more Lecture notes Production Planning and Control in PDF only on Docsity!

[Rajesh Dhake]

Prioritization Matrix

• These tools prioritize tasks, issues, alternatives,

etc., based on weighted criteria

• A prioritization matrix is used to make decisions

based on multiple criteria, i.e. when there are

multiple alternatives and multiple criteria

• Types:

– Criteria Prioritization Matrix

– Task Prioritization Matrix

[Rajesh Dhake]

Criteria Prioritization Matrix

Purpose

To improve any decision making process by rationally

prioritizing or ranking criteria ( which will then be used to

prioritize the tasks, issues, alternatives, etc. ).

Steps

1.Generate a set of criteria to be used in making a ‘quality‘

decision.

2.Construct an L matrix with criteria down the left side and

criteria across the top.

3.Compare the criteria in EACH row with the criteria in EACH of

the columns ( i.e., a 'pair-wise' comparison ).

4.The Team should discuss each comparison and reach

consensus on the relative importance of the two criteria. Avoid

voting if at all possible.

[Rajesh Dhake]

Criteria Prioritization Matrix

=Much More Important =More Important The =Same =Less Important =MuchLess Important 9 3 1 0.333 0. Criteria Grades^ Learning^ Mental^ Physical^ Relationship X 1 2 3 4 5 Total^ % Grades (^) 1 X (^) 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.33 (^16) Learning (^) 2 3.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 (^28) Mental (^) (^3) 1.00 1.00 X (^) 1.00 1.00 4.00 (^19) Physical (^) 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 1.00 4.00 (^19) Relationship (^) 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 4.00 (^19) 6.00 3.33 4.00 4.00 4.00 21.33 (^100) 28.1 15.6 18.8 18.8 18.8 100 21. (1) Compare the criteria in EACH (^) row with the criteria in EACH of the (^) columns ( i.e., a 'pairwise' comparison ) (2) Enter the appropriate word (e.g., =Same ) for the comparison in the appropriate ROW and COLUMN. For example, if Grades ( Row 1 ) are Less Important than Learning ( Column 2 ), then enter =Less in R1/C. (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the criteria.

•A particular job requires five qualities:

  • Grades (Merit), Learning Ability, Mental Ability, Physical

Fitness &, Relationship With Others

•The following matrix establishes the importance of each quality

[Rajesh Dhake]

Criteria Prioritization Matrix

=Much More Important =More Important The =Same =Less Important =MuchLess Important 9 3 1 0.333 0. Criteria Grades^ Learning^ Mental^ Physical^ Relationship X 1 2 3 4 5 Total^ % Grades (^) 1 X (^) 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.33 (^16) Learning (^) 2 3.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 (^28) Mental (^) (^3) 1.00 1.00 X (^) 1.00 1.00 4.00 (^19) Physical (^) 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 1.00 4.00 (^19) Relationship (^) 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 4.00 (^19) 6.00 3.33 4.00 4.00 4.00 21.33 (^100) 28.1 15.6 18.8 18.8 18.8 100 21. (1) Compare the criteria in EACH (^) row with the criteria in EACH of the (^) columns ( i.e., a 'pairwise' comparison ) (2) Enter the appropriate word (e.g., =Same ) for the comparison in the appropriate ROW and COLUMN. For example, if Grades ( Row 1 ) are Less Important than Learning ( Column 2 ), then enter =Less in R1/C. (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the criteria.

•A particular job requires five qualities:

  • Grades (Merit), Learning Ability, Mental Ability, Physical

Fitness &, Relationship With Others

•The following matrix establishes the importance of each quality

[Rajesh Dhake]

Criteria Prioritization Matrix

=Much More Important =More Important The =Same =Less Important =MuchLess Important 9 3 1 0.333 0. Criteria Grades^ Learning^ Mental^ Physical^ Relationship X 1 2 3 4 5 Total^ % Grades (^) 1 X (^) 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.33 (^16) Learning (^) 2 3.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 (^28) Mental (^) (^3) 1.00 1.00 X (^) 1.00 1.00 4.00 (^19) Physical (^) 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 1.00 4.00 (^19) Relationship (^) 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 4.00 (^19) 6.00 3.33 4.00 4.00 4.00 21.33 (^100) 28.1 15.6 18.8 18.8 18.8 100 21. (1) Compare the criteria in EACH (^) row with the criteria in EACH of the (^) columns ( i.e., a 'pairwise' comparison ) (2) Enter the appropriate word (e.g., =Same ) for the comparison in the appropriate ROW and COLUMN. For example, if Grades ( Row 1 ) are Less Important than Learning ( Column 2 ), then enter =Less in R1/C. (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the criteria.

•A particular job requires five qualities:

  • Grades (Merit), Learning Ability, Mental Ability, Physical

Fitness &, Relationship With Others

•The following matrix establishes the importance of each quality

[Rajesh Dhake]

Criteria Prioritization Matrix

=Much More Important =More Important The =Same =Less Important =MuchLess Important 9 3 1 0.333 0. Criteria Grades^ Learning^ Mental^ Physical^ Relationship X 1 2 3 4 5 Total^ % Grades (^) 1 X (^) 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.33 (^16) Learning (^) 2 3.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 (^28) Mental (^) (^3) 1.00 1.00 X (^) 1.00 1.00 4.00 (^19) Physical (^) 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 1.00 4.00 (^19) Relationship (^) 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X 4.00 (^19) 6.00 3.33 4.00 4.00 4.00 21.33 (^100) 28.1 15.6 18.8 18.8 18.8 100 21. (1) Compare the criteria in EACH (^) row with the criteria in EACH of the (^) columns ( i.e., a 'pairwise' comparison ) (2) Enter the appropriate word (e.g., =Same ) for the comparison in the appropriate ROW and COLUMN. For example, if Grades ( Row 1 ) are Less Important than Learning ( Column 2 ), then enter =Less in R1/C. (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the criteria.

•A particular job requires five qualities:

  • Grades (Merit), Learning Ability, Mental Ability, Physical

Fitness &, Relationship With Others

•The following matrix establishes the importance of each quality

[Rajesh Dhake]

Task Prioritization Matrix

Purpose

To improve any decision making process by rationally

prioritizing, or ranking, tasks, issues, alternatives, etc. using

weighted criteria.

Steps

1.Generate a set of criteria to be used in making a quality

decision. Determine the weight for each criterion using the

Full Consensus Criteria Matrix process.

2.Construct an L matrix with tasks, etc. down the left side and

the selection criteria across the top.

3.Enter the ‘full analytical criteria’ weights in the L matrix in the

row below the criteria.

[Rajesh Dhake]

Task Prioritization Matrix

4.For EACH criteria (or column), rank order all the tasks, etc.

with respect to that criteria ( e.g., using the modified nominal

group technique). Enter the rank, or vote totals, for each

task, etc. into the L matrix in the appropriate column and row.

N.B. The higher the rank, or the larger the number, the more

important the task.

5.Find the product of the individual rank, or vote totals, and

criterion weight for each task (or row), etc. and sum these

products for each row.

6.The rows with the highest sums are the issues of highest

priority. Be sure to discuss any row which has a low total but

seems important enough to retain. Always review the

numerical values to determine if they ‘make sense’ to the

team!

[Rajesh Dhake] Criteria Grades Learning Mental Physical Relationship Weights 0.156 0.281 0.188 0.188 0. Tasks (^) 1 2 3 4 5 Total (^) % Attend Class (^) 1 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.31 (^20) Homework (^) 2 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.47 (^22) Recreation (^) 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 (^15) Sleep (^) 4 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.16 (^18) Study (^) 5 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.63 (^25) 2.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 6.56 (^100) 35.7 21.4 14.3 14.3 14.3 100 6. (1) Enter the criteria and the numerical weights for each criteria in the appropriate rows below. ( N.B. This example uses Full Consensus Criteria from the matrix above. ) (2) Rank the tasks in EACH row using the criteria in EACH of the columns. ( N.B. The HIGHER the rank, or the LARGER the number, the MORE IMPORTANT the task. ) ( For example, in the matrix below a rank of 5.0, or the highest value, is assigned to STUDY. ) (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the task.

Task Prioritization Matrix

  • Students evaluation of term work is based on five tasks:
    • Attendance, Assignments, Timely Submissions, Journal & Knowledge About The Subject
  • The following matrix identifies the weightage that should be given to each task for evaluation of term work Journal Submission Knowledge Journal Attendance Assignment

[Rajesh Dhake] Criteria Grades Learning Mental Physical Relationship Weights 0.156 0.281 0.188 0.188 0. Tasks (^) 1 2 3 4 5 Total (^) % Attend Class (^) 1 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.31 (^20) Homework (^) 2 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.47 (^22) Recreation (^) 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 (^15) Sleep (^) 4 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.16 (^18) Study (^) 5 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.63 (^25) 2.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 6.56 (^100) 35.7 21.4 14.3 14.3 14.3 100 6. (1) Enter the criteria and the numerical weights for each criteria in the appropriate rows below. ( N.B. This example uses Full Consensus Criteria from the matrix above. ) (2) Rank the tasks in EACH row using the criteria in EACH of the columns. ( N.B. The HIGHER the rank, or the LARGER the number, the MORE IMPORTANT the task. ) ( For example, in the matrix below a rank of 5.0, or the highest value, is assigned to STUDY. ) (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the task.

Task Prioritization Matrix

  • Students evaluation of term work is based on five tasks:
    • Attendance, Assignments, Timely Submissions, Journal & Knowledge About The Subject
  • The following matrix identifies the weightage that should be given to each task for evaluation of term work Journal Submission Knowledge Journal Attendance Assignment

[Rajesh Dhake] Criteria Grades Learning Mental Physical Relationship Weights 0.156 0.281 0.188 0.188 0. Tasks (^) 1 2 3 4 5 Total (^) % Attend Class (^) 1 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.31 (^20) Homework (^) 2 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.47 (^22) Recreation (^) 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 (^15) Sleep (^) 4 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.16 (^18) Study (^) 5 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.63 (^25) 2.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 6.56 (^100) 35.7 21.4 14.3 14.3 14.3 100 6. (1) Enter the criteria and the numerical weights for each criteria in the appropriate rows below. ( N.B. This example uses Full Consensus Criteria from the matrix above. ) (2) Rank the tasks in EACH row using the criteria in EACH of the columns. ( N.B. The HIGHER the rank, or the LARGER the number, the MORE IMPORTANT the task. ) ( For example, in the matrix below a rank of 5.0, or the highest value, is assigned to STUDY. ) (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the task.

Task Prioritization Matrix

  • Students evaluation of term work is based on five tasks:
    • Attendance, Assignments, Timely Submissions, Journal & Knowledge About The Subject
  • The following matrix identifies the weightage that should be given to each task for evaluation of term work Journal Submission Knowledge Journal Attendance Assignment

[Rajesh Dhake] Criteria Grades Learning Mental Physical Relationship Weights 0.156 0.281 0.188 0.188 0. Tasks (^) 1 2 3 4 5 Total (^) % Attend Class (^) 1 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.31 (^20) Homework (^) 2 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.47 (^22) Recreation (^) 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 (^15) Sleep (^) 4 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.16 (^18) Study (^) 5 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.63 (^25) 2.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 6.56 (^100) 35.7 21.4 14.3 14.3 14.3 100 6. (1) Enter the criteria and the numerical weights for each criteria in the appropriate rows below. ( N.B. This example uses Full Consensus Criteria from the matrix above. ) (2) Rank the tasks in EACH row using the criteria in EACH of the columns. ( N.B. The HIGHER the rank, or the LARGER the number, the MORE IMPORTANT the task. ) ( For example, in the matrix below a rank of 5.0, or the highest value, is assigned to STUDY. ) (3) The HIGHER or LARGER the % , the MORE IMPORTANT the task.

Task Prioritization Matrix

  • Students evaluation of term work is based on five tasks:
    • Attendance, Assignments, Timely Submissions, Journal & Knowledge About The Subject
  • The following matrix identifies the weightage that should be given to each task for evaluation of term work Journal Submission Knowledge Journal Attendance Assignment

[Rajesh Dhake]

Example: Prioritization Grid