

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Material Type: Assignment; Class: Probability with Engrg Applic; Subject: Electrical and Computer Engr; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Spring 2002;
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


University Problem Set #8 ECE 313
of Illinois Page 1 of 2 Spring 2002
Assigned: Wednesday, March 6 Due: Wednesday, March 13 Reading: Ross, Chapter 4, Section 9; and Chapter 5 Noncredit Exercises: Chapter 5: Problems 1-8; Theoretical Exercises: 1, 8 Note: In honor of Engineering Open House, this Problem Set has only four problems on it… Problems: 1. [“… It’s not your father’s Oldsmobile…”] A system works if and only if all of its M components (numbered 1 through M) work. Each component fails (independently) with probability p. Consider two possible means of obtaining a more reliable system. We can replicate each component N times as shown in the graph model on the left. Or, we can replicate the entire system N times as shown in the graph model on the right. In either case, the result is called a replicated system. Note that both methods use the same number N of each component.
N-ary replication of each component N-ary replication of entire system
System. System. System.
System.N
A concrete example of the question we wish to consider is: Which of the following two methods provides more reliable transportation?
2. [“Reach out and touch someone”] MiddleEast Bell, a division of Psingular Corp., has built a telephone network as shown below. Terrorists attack each of the seven links. The attacks may be considered to be independent events, and the attack on a link succeeds in severing the link with probability p. If a link is severed, switches automatically re-route calls so as to avoid the failed link (if possible). (a) What is the probability of being able to call from ORIAC to SUCSAMAD? (b) Given that it is possible to call from ORIAC to SUCSAMAD, what is the conditional probability that the ZEUS to NAMMA link is in working condition? (c) The link capacities (i.e., the numbers of telephone calls that the links can carry (in either direction)) are as marked on the diagram. Let X denote the number of calls that can be made from ORIAC to SUCSAMAD. Find the pmf and the expected value of X.
ORIAC
ZEUS
NAMMA
NONABEL
SUCSAMAD
VIVA LET
100 100
20
(^5020)
50
100
University Problem Set #8 ECE 313
of Illinois Page 2 of 2 Spring 2002
3. The random variable X has the CDF shown in Figure 4.1 on p. 133 of Ross (5th edition) or Figure 4.7 on p. 168 of Ross (6th edition). Find E[ X ]. 4. The random variable X has probability density function
f X (u) =
α(1 – u), 0 < u < 1 , 0, elsewhere.
(a) Find P{6 X^2 > 5 X – 1}. (b) Find F X (u). Be sure to specify the value of F X (u) for all u.
Noncredit optional exercise: Some of you were concerned about the use of the Chebyshev inequality in Problem 2 of Problem Set #5 to get that at least 4123 repetitions were needed to achieve the desired error probability. Here is a tighter result. With X denoting an (n,p) binomial random variable,
(a) Show that if λ > 0, then exp
λ
u – n 2
1 for all u >
n 2 and that therefore
n 2
u>n/
n
u>n/
n exp
λ
u – n 2
u=
n exp
λ
u – n 2 p X (u)
i.e., P{ X >
n 2
exp
λ
X – n 2
This result is called a Chernoff bound (see also Chapter 8 of Ross). (b) Use LOTUS to prove directly from the known pmf of X that
E[exp(λ X )] = (1 – p + p•exp(λ))n and hence that P{ X > n/2} < exp(–nλ/2)•(1 – p + p•exp(λ))n for all values of λ > 0.
(c) Evaluate the above bound on P{ X > n/2} at λ = ln 2 and at λ = – ln p.
(d) Prove that as a function of λ, exp(–nλ/2)•(1 – p + p•exp(λ))n has minimum value
n at λ = ln((1–p)/p). How different is ln((1–p)/p) from – ln p?
(e) Repeat part (c) of Problem #2 of Problem Set #5 to choose the value of n using the Chernoff bound rather than the Chebyshev inequality. Who gets the raise for designing an efficient communication system, you who slogged through to here or your pal who stopped at part (c) of Problem #2 of Problem Set #5?