

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The solutions to problem 21 of phys 132 homework, which explores the relationship between central density and degeneracy pressure in a body supported by degenerate electrons. The document derives an equation that shows when the central density from degeneracy becomes comparable to the density of ordinary matter. The analysis is based on phillips eq. (6.1) and eq. (2.22), and it discusses the implications of using hydrogen instead of heavier elements in calculating the chandrasekhar mass.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Professor Crystal Martin TA: Ellie Hadjiyska
Problem 21: (Phillips Problem 6.1) We now want to show that the central density of a body supported by degenerate electrons becomes comparable with normal atomic densities when the mass of the body is comparable with MP = (αEM /αG)^3 /^2 mH = α^3 EM/^2 M∗. We begin by looking at what relationship degeneracy gives us between central temperature and density. The electron density is related to the central mass density by (Phillips Eq. (6.1))
ne = Ye
ρc mH
where Ye is the ratio of electrons to nucleons and m is the mass of hydrogen. If we assume the star is supported by degeneracy pressure, we can set this equal to the quantum concentration (Phillips Eq. (2.22))
ne = Ye^ ρc mH
= nQ =
mekTc 2 πℏ^2
where ℏ = h/(2π). From Problem 2, part (c) we found a relation between central temperature and density:
Tc =^1 2
4 π 3
m¯ k
GM 2 /^3 ρ^1 c/^3
Plugging this into our previous expression gives
Ye^ ρc mH
mek 2 πℏ^2
4 π 3
m¯ k
GM 2 /^3 ρ^1 c/^3
or
Ye^ ρc mH
4 π
m^3 e/ 2 G^3 /^2 m¯^3 /^2 M ρ^1 c/^2 ℏ^3 or
ρ^1 c /^2 = mH 4 πYe
m^3 e/ 2 G^3 /^2 m¯^3 /^2 ℏ^3
We now look at what happens when this central density from degeneracy is comparable to the density we’d expect from ordinary, uncompressed matter. i.e.
ρc ∼ ρatomic = mH a^3 B
mH α^3 EM m^3 ec^3 ℏ^3
Plugging in we get m^1 H/ 2 α^3 EM/^2 m^3 e /^2 c^3 /^2 ℏ^3 /^2
mH 4 πYe
m^3 e/ 2 G^3 /^2 m¯^3 /^2 ℏ^3 MP
or simplifying
MP = 4πYe
( (^) mH m ¯
) 3 / 2 (^ ℏc Gm^2 H
α^3 EM/^2 mH = 4πYe
( (^) mH m ¯
) 3 / 2 (^ αEM αG
mH
where we have used αG = Gm^2 H /(ℏc) (Phillips Eq. (5.63)). For a pure hydrogen star, ¯m = mH and we get
MP = 4πYe
αEM αG
mH ∼
αEM αG
mH = α^3 EM/^2 M∗
For hydrogen, the ratio of electrons to nucleons Ye = 1 since most hydrogen is one proton and one electron. For heavier elements (such as iron), this ratio is 1:2 or Ye ≈ 0 .5. This is why we see this number used in calculating the Chandrasekhar mass for a white dwarf (which is composed primarily of carbon and oxygen). So for a given central density ρc, using hydrogen instead of heavier elements gives twice the electron density. This would make the mass MP half what we originally calculated. Even more importantly, the average mass per particle for a pure iron star is much larger ( ¯m = 56mH ) and we see that raised to the 3/2 power, it would cut our resulting mass down more than two orders of magnitude! It would make our mass much smaller than what was found (i.e. a pure iron star would be 2(56)^3 /^2 ≈ 840 times smaller than a pure hydrogen star!).
Note: If you used Phillips Eq. (6.4) to get to the answer or worked the reverse of this problem (i.e. started with M = α^3 EM/^2 M∗ = 0. 001 MØ and showed ρatomic was comparable to ρc), that was fine.