
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A problem set for a mathematical logic course, math 570, taught by prof. Ward henson during the fall semester 2004. The problem set includes five problems, and students are required to do four of them. The problems cover topics such as maximal consistent sets, truth assignments, propositional logic, and independent sets. Students must provide complete and careful proofs for each problem, justifying their claims and explaining their ideas clearly. Some problems have specific restrictions, such as not using the completeness theorem in certain problems, but allowing the use of the deduction lemma and other lemmas.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!

Math 570: Mathematical Logic Fall Semester 2004 Prof. Ward Henson Friday, September 3, 2004
Problem Set 1 – Due in class Monday, September 13, 2004.
There are five problems (25 points each) and you should do four of them. To earn full credit requires a careful writeup of each problem, taking care to justify everything you claim and to explain your ideas clearly. In Problems 1,2, you may NOT use the Completeness Theorem, but you may use the Deduction Lemma as well as Lemma 2.2.1 and Corollary 2.2.7.
1.1. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms and suppose Σ ⊆ Prop(A) is a maxi- mal consistent set of propositions. Let t : A → { 0 , 1 } be the unique truth assign- ment satisfying t(a) = 1 ⇔ a ∈ Σ for all a ∈ A. Write out a complete and careful proof that for any p ∈ Prop(A), one has t(p) = 1 ⇔ p ∈ Σ. (Some of this was done in class, but you should include that in your writeup. The basic structure of your argument can be similar to the proof of Lemma 2.2.10, although the statements of the results to be proved are technically different. Note that even in the text, Case 3 of that proof was left to the reader.)
1.2. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms. To each symbol s assign a weight, denoted w(s), as follows: if s is an atom or > or ⊥, then w(s) = −1; w(¬) = 0; w(∧) = w(∨) = 1. Give a proof by induction on propositions of the following statement: If s 1 ,... , sm are symbols such that the word s 1... sm ∈ Prop(A), then w(s 1 ) + · · · + w(sm) = − 1.
1.3. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms, Σ ⊆ Prop(A), and p, q ∈ Prop(A). Prove the following statements: (a) {p, q} ∧pq; (b) if Σ ∪ {p} q and Σ ∪ {q} p, then Σ (p ↔ q); (c) if Σ ∪ {p} q, then Σ ∪ {¬q} ¬p; (d) ¬ ∨ pq ` ∧¬p¬q.
1.4. Problem. Let A be a finite set of atoms, with n elements. (a) For any set S of truth assignments (from A to { 0 , 1 }), show that there is a proposition p ∈ Prop(A) such that S is exactly the set of truth assignments t : A → { 0 , 1 } such that t(p) = 1. (b) A subset {p 1 ,... , pk} of Prop(A) is independent if {pi | i ∈ F } 6 |= pj holds whenever 1 ≤ j ≤ k, F ⊆ { 1 ,... , k}, and j 6 ∈ F. Determine the maximum size of an independent subset of Prop(A).
1.5. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms and let Σ and ∆ be subsets of Prop(A). Assume that there does not exist any truth assignment t : A → { 0 , 1 } which is simultaneously a model of Σ and a model of ∆. Show that there exists p ∈ Prop(A) such that Σ p and ∆ ¬p.