Math 570: Problem Set 1 - Mathematical Logic, Assignments of Reasoning

A problem set for a mathematical logic course, math 570, taught by prof. Ward henson during the fall semester 2004. The problem set includes five problems, and students are required to do four of them. The problems cover topics such as maximal consistent sets, truth assignments, propositional logic, and independent sets. Students must provide complete and careful proofs for each problem, justifying their claims and explaining their ideas clearly. Some problems have specific restrictions, such as not using the completeness theorem in certain problems, but allowing the use of the deduction lemma and other lemmas.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/11/2009

koofers-user-qbc
koofers-user-qbc 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 570: Mathematical Logic
Fall Semester 2004
Prof. Ward Henson
Friday, September 3, 2004
Problem Set 1 Due in class Monday, September 13, 2004.
There are five problems (25 points each) and you should do four of them.
To earn full credit requires a careful writeup of each problem, taking care to
justify everything you claim and to explain your ideas clearly. In Problems 1,2,3
you may NOT use the Completeness Theorem, but you may use the Deduction
Lemma as well as Lemma 2.2.1 and Corollary 2.2.7.
1.1. Problem. Let Abe a set of atoms and suppose Σ Prop(A) is a maxi-
mal consistent set of propositions. Let t:A {0,1}be the unique truth assign-
ment satisfying t(a) = 1 aΣ for all aA. Write out a complete and careful
proof that for any pProp(A), one has t(p)=1pΣ. (Some of this was
done in class, but you should include that in your writeup. The basic structure
of your argument can be similar to the proof of Lemma 2.2.10, although the
statements of the results to be proved are technically different. Note that even
in the text, Case 3 of that proof was left to the reader.)
1.2. Problem. Let Abe a set of atoms. To each symbol sassign a weight,
denoted w(s), as follows: if sis an atom or >or , then w(s) = 1; w(¬) = 0;
w() = w() = 1.
Give a proof by induction on propositions of the following statement: If s1, . . . , sm
are symbols such that the word s1. . . smProp(A), then w(s1) + · · · +w(sm) =
1.
1.3. Problem. Let Abe a set of atoms, Σ Prop(A), and p, q Prop(A).
Prove the following statements:
(a) {p, q}`∧pq;
(b) if Σ {p} ` qand Σ {q} ` p, then Σ `(pq);
(c) if Σ {p} ` q, then Σ q}`¬p;
(d) ¬ pq ` ∧¬p¬q.
1.4. Problem. Let Abe a finite set of atoms, with nelements.
(a) For any set Sof truth assignments (from Ato {0,1}), show that there is
a proposition pProp(A) such that Sis exactly the set of truth assignments
t:A {0,1}such that t(p) = 1.
(b) A subset {p1, . . . , pk}of Prop(A) is independent if {pi|iF} 6|=pjholds
whenever 1 jk,F {1, . . . , k}, and j6∈ F. Determine the maximum size
of an independent subset of Prop(A).
1.5. Problem. Let Abe a set of atoms and let Σ and be subsets of Prop(A).
Assume that there does not exist any truth assignment t:A {0,1}which is
simultaneously a model of Σ and a model of ∆. Show that there exists p
Prop(A) such that Σ `pand ` ¬p.

Partial preview of the text

Download Math 570: Problem Set 1 - Mathematical Logic and more Assignments Reasoning in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 570: Mathematical Logic Fall Semester 2004 Prof. Ward Henson Friday, September 3, 2004

Problem Set 1 – Due in class Monday, September 13, 2004.

There are five problems (25 points each) and you should do four of them. To earn full credit requires a careful writeup of each problem, taking care to justify everything you claim and to explain your ideas clearly. In Problems 1,2, you may NOT use the Completeness Theorem, but you may use the Deduction Lemma as well as Lemma 2.2.1 and Corollary 2.2.7.

1.1. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms and suppose Σ ⊆ Prop(A) is a maxi- mal consistent set of propositions. Let t : A → { 0 , 1 } be the unique truth assign- ment satisfying t(a) = 1 ⇔ a ∈ Σ for all a ∈ A. Write out a complete and careful proof that for any p ∈ Prop(A), one has t(p) = 1 ⇔ p ∈ Σ. (Some of this was done in class, but you should include that in your writeup. The basic structure of your argument can be similar to the proof of Lemma 2.2.10, although the statements of the results to be proved are technically different. Note that even in the text, Case 3 of that proof was left to the reader.)

1.2. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms. To each symbol s assign a weight, denoted w(s), as follows: if s is an atom or > or ⊥, then w(s) = −1; w(¬) = 0; w(∧) = w(∨) = 1. Give a proof by induction on propositions of the following statement: If s 1 ,... , sm are symbols such that the word s 1... sm ∈ Prop(A), then w(s 1 ) + · · · + w(sm) = − 1.

1.3. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms, Σ ⊆ Prop(A), and p, q ∈ Prop(A). Prove the following statements: (a) {p, q} ∧pq; (b) if Σ ∪ {p} q and Σ ∪ {q} p, then Σ (p ↔ q); (c) if Σ ∪ {p} q, then Σ ∪ {¬q} ¬p; (d) ¬ ∨ pq ` ∧¬p¬q.

1.4. Problem. Let A be a finite set of atoms, with n elements. (a) For any set S of truth assignments (from A to { 0 , 1 }), show that there is a proposition p ∈ Prop(A) such that S is exactly the set of truth assignments t : A → { 0 , 1 } such that t(p) = 1. (b) A subset {p 1 ,... , pk} of Prop(A) is independent if {pi | i ∈ F } 6 |= pj holds whenever 1 ≤ j ≤ k, F ⊆ { 1 ,... , k}, and j 6 ∈ F. Determine the maximum size of an independent subset of Prop(A).

1.5. Problem. Let A be a set of atoms and let Σ and ∆ be subsets of Prop(A). Assume that there does not exist any truth assignment t : A → { 0 , 1 } which is simultaneously a model of Σ and a model of ∆. Show that there exists p ∈ Prop(A) such that Σ p and ∆ ¬p.