Statistics 431 Problem Set 2: Statistical Inference and Hypothesis Testing, Assignments of Statistics

Problem set 2 for statistics 431: statistical inference, fall 2006. The problem set includes various statistical hypothesis testing questions based on given data sets and scenarios. Topics covered include one-sided and two-sided tests, testing mean differences, and checking fairness of coins. Students are expected to apply statistical concepts and methods to solve these problems.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/28/2010

koofers-user-gvq
koofers-user-gvq 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Statistics 431: Statistical Inference
Fall 2006
Problem Set 2 Due 2 Oct 2005
Devore Chapter 8: #6, 12, 22, 28, 32, 38, 39, 42.
Note: The wording in question 39 is not precise. The “random sample of 1,050” referred to in the
question was actually chosen according to court-determined procedures. The issue here is whether
these procedures actually produced a random sample, as intended, or merely a sample. Swain’s
attorneys and the solution in the back of the book use a one-sided test. Suppose you were the
defense lawyer, representing the state of Alabama. How would you argue that a two-sided test
is more appropriate for this situation? Would it have made any substantive difference to the final
evaluation if a two-sided test had been used?
Additionally:
A. In problem B of problem set 1, the intended octane rating of the gasoline produced by the
company is 87.
(a) Use the data of problem B, problem set 1 to test (at level α=0.05) whether the company’s
mean octane rating for the day in question was different from 87.
(b) Suppose the company does not claim that its “regular” grade gasoline has an octane rating of
exactly 87. Instead, it claims the octane rating is at least 87. Perform a test (at level α=0.05)
designed to verify that the company’s claim is correct.
B. While imprisoned by the Germans in World War II, the English mathematician John Kerrich
tossed his only coin 10,000 times and obtained 5,076 heads. Let pdenote the probability of a head
on a single toss. We wish to check whether the data are consistent with the hypothesis that the coin
was fair. Assume the outcomes of the tosses are mutually independent.
(a) Set up the statistical hypotheses. Whyshould the alternative be two-sided even though Kerrich
obtained more heads than tails on his 10,000 tosses?
(b) Does your test reject the null hypothesis at α=0.05?
(c) Find a 95% CI for the proportion of heads for Kerrich’s coin. Does this CI contain p=1/2?
(d) On his first 1,000 flips Kerrich obtained 574 heads. Does this information alter your conclu-
sion in (b)?
1

Partial preview of the text

Download Statistics 431 Problem Set 2: Statistical Inference and Hypothesis Testing and more Assignments Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

Statistics 431: Statistical Inference

Fall 2006

Problem Set 2 Due 2 Oct 2005

Devore Chapter 8: #6, 12, 22, 28, 32, 38, 39, 42. Note: The wording in question 39 is not precise. The “random sample of 1,050” referred to in the question was actually chosen according to court-determined procedures. The issue here is whether these procedures actually produced a random sample, as intended, or merely a sample. Swain’s attorneys – and the solution in the back of the book – use a one-sided test. Suppose you were the defense lawyer, representing the state of Alabama. How would you argue that a two-sided test is more appropriate for this situation? Would it have made any substantive difference to the final evaluation if a two-sided test had been used?

Additionally:

A. In problem B of problem set 1, the intended octane rating of the gasoline produced by the company is 87.

(a) Use the data of problem B, problem set 1 to test (at level α = 0 .05) whether the company’s mean octane rating for the day in question was different from 87.

(b) Suppose the company does not claim that its “regular” grade gasoline has an octane rating of exactly 87. Instead, it claims the octane rating is at least 87. Perform a test (at level α = 0 .05) designed to verify that the company’s claim is correct.

B. While imprisoned by the Germans in World War II, the English mathematician John Kerrich tossed his only coin 10,000 times and obtained 5,076 heads. Let p denote the probability of a head on a single toss. We wish to check whether the data are consistent with the hypothesis that the coin was fair. Assume the outcomes of the tosses are mutually independent.

(a) Set up the statistical hypotheses. Why should the alternative be two-sided even though Kerrich obtained more heads than tails on his 10,000 tosses?

(b) Does your test reject the null hypothesis at α = 0 .05?

(c) Find a 95% CI for the proportion of heads for Kerrich’s coin. Does this CI contain p = 1 /2?

(d) On his first 1,000 flips Kerrich obtained 574 heads. Does this information alter your conclu- sion in (b)?